Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-03T00:15:39.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laminar separated flows over finite-aspect-ratio swept wings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2020

Kai Zhang Open the ORCID record for Kai Zhang [Opens in a new window] ,
Shelby Hayostek ,
Michael Amitay Open the ORCID record for Michael Amitay [Opens in a new window] ,
Anton Burtsev ,
Vassilios Theofilis Open the ORCID record for Vassilios Theofilis [Opens in a new window]  and
Kunihiko Taira Open the ORCID record for Kunihiko Taira [Opens in a new window]
Kai Zhang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA90095, USA
Shelby Hayostek
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Aeronautical, and Nuclear Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY12180, USA
Michael Amitay
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Aeronautical, and Nuclear Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY12180, USA
Anton Burtsev
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Materials and Aerospace Engineering, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, LiverpoolL69 3GH, UK
Vassilios Theofilis
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical, Materials and Aerospace Engineering, University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, LiverpoolL69 3GH, UK Department of Mechanical Engineering, Escola Politecnica, Universidade São Paulo, Avda. Prof. Mello Moraes 2231, CEP 5508-900São Paulo, Brasil
Kunihiko Taira
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA90095, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We perform direct numerical simulations of laminar separated flows over finite-aspect-ratio swept wings at a chord-based Reynolds number of $Re = 400$ to reveal a variety of wake structures generated for a range of aspect ratios (semi aspect ratio $sAR=0.5\text {--}4$), angles of attack ($\alpha =16^{\circ }\text {--}30^{\circ }$) and sweep angles ($\varLambda =0^{\circ }\text {--}45^{\circ }$). Flows behind swept wings exhibit increased complexity in their dynamical features compared to unswept-wing wakes. For unswept wings, the wake dynamics are predominantly influenced by the tip effects. Steady wakes are mainly limited to low-aspect-ratio wings. Unsteady vortex shedding takes place near the midspan of higher-$AR$ wings due to weakened downwash induced by the tip vortices. With increasing sweep angle, the source of three-dimensionality transitions from the tip to the midspan. The three-dimensional midspan effects are responsible for the formation of the stationary vortical structures at the inboard part of the span, which expands the steady wake region to higher aspect ratios. At higher aspect ratios, the midspan effects of swept wings diminish at the outboard region, allowing unsteady vortex shedding to develop near the tip. In the wakes of highly swept wings, streamwise finger-like structures form repetitively along the wing span, providing a stabilizing effect. The insights revealed from this study can aid the design of high-lift devices and serve as a stepping stone for understanding the complex wake dynamics at higher Reynolds numbers and those generated by unsteady wing manoeuvres.

JFM classification

Wakes/Jets: Separated flows Wakes/Jets: Wakes Vortex Flows: Vortex dynamics
Type
JFM Rapids
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 905 , 25 December 2020 , R1
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

Present address: Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University.

References

REFERENCES

Beem, H. R., Rival, D. E. & Triantafyllou, M. S. 2012 On the stabilization of leading-edge vortices with spanwise flow. Exp. Fluids 52 (2), 511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Gida, H., Gurka, R. & Weihs, D. 2020 Leading-edge vortex as a high-lift mechanism for large-aspect-ratio wings. AIAA J. 58 (7), 2806–2819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. 1956 Flow studies of the leading edge stall on a swept-back wing at high incidence. Aeronaut. J. 60 (541), 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVoria, A. C. & Mohseni, K. 2017 On the mechanism of high-incidence lift generation for steadily translating low-aspect-ratio wings. J. Fluid Mech. 813, 110–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldredge, J. D. & Jones, A. R. 2019 Leading-edge vortices: mechanics and modeling. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51 (1), 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garmann, D. J. & Visbal, M. R. 2020 Examination of pitch-plunge equivalence for dynamic stall over swept finite wings. AIAA Paper 2020-1759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gursul, I. 2005 Review of unsteady vortex flows over slender delta wings. J. Aircraft 42 (2), 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gursul, I., Gordnier, R. & Visbal, M. 2005 Unsteady aerodynamics of nonslender delta wings. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 41 (7), 515–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ham, F. & Iaccarino, G. 2004 Energy conservation in collocated discretization schemes on unstructured meshes. In Annual Research Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
Ham, F., Mattsson, K. & Iaccarino, G. 2006 Accurate and stable finite volume operators for unstructured flow solvers. In Annual Research Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, pp. 243–261.Google Scholar
Harper, C. W. & Maki, R. L. 1964 A review of the stall characteristics of swept wings. NASA Tech. Note D-2373.Google Scholar
Jardin, T. 2017 Coriolis effect and the attachment of the leading edge vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 820, 312–340.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. B., Stanek, M. J., Gurka, R. & Hackett, E. E. 2019 Leading-edge vortices over swept-back wings with varying sweep geometries. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6 (7), 190514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lentink, D. & Dickinson, M. H. 2009 Rotational accelerations stabilize leading edge vortices on revolving fly wings. J. Expl Biol. 212 (16), 2705–2719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lentink, D., Müller, U. K., Stamhuis, E. J., De Kat, R., Van Gestel, W., Veldhuis, L. L. M., Henningsson, P., Hedenström, A., Videler, J. J. & Van Leeuwen, J. L. 2007 How swifts control their glide performance with morphing wings. Nature 446 (7139), 1082–1085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulleners, K., Mancini, P. & Jones, A. R. 2017 Flow development on a flat-plate wing subjected to a streamwise acceleration. AIAA J. 55 (6), 2118–2122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickel, K. & Wohlfahrt, M. 1994 Tailless Aircraft in Theory and Practice. AIAA.Google Scholar
Polhamus, E. C. 1966 A concept of the vortex lift of sharp-edge delta wings based on a leading-edge-suction analogy. NASA Tech. Note D-3736.Google Scholar
Rockwell, D. 1993 Three-dimensional flow structure on delta wings at high angle-of-attack: experimental concepts and issues. AIAA Paper 1993-0550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarpkaya, T. 1966 Separated flow about lifting bodies and impulsive flow about cylinders. AIAA J. 4 (3), 414–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlichting, H. & Truckenbrodt, E. 1960 Aerodynamik des Flugzeuges: Grundlagen aus der Strömungsmechanik, Aerodynamik des Tragflügels (Teil II). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taira, K. & Colonius, T. 2009 Three-dimensional flows around low-aspect-ratio flat-plate wings at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 623, 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, K. D. & Morrison, D. F. 1971 The spacing, position and strength of vortices in the wake of slender cylindrical bodies at large incidence. J. Fluid Mech. 50 (4), 751–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Videler, J. J., Stamhuis, E. J. & Povel, G. D. E. 2004 Leading-edge vortex lifts swifts. Science 306 (5703), 1960–1962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visbal, M. R. & Garmann, D. J. 2019 Effect of sweep on dynamic stall of a pitching finite-aspect-ratio wing. AIAA J. 57 (8), 3274–3289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkelmann, A., Barlow, J., Saini, J., Anderson, J. Jr. & Jones, E. 1980 The effects of leading edge modifications on the post-stall characteristics of wings. AIAA Paper 1980-0199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yen, S. C. & Hsu, C. M. 2007 Flow patterns and wake structure of a swept-back wing. AIAA J. 45 (1), 228–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yen, S. C. & Huang, L. C. 2009 Flow patterns and aerodynamic performance of unswept and swept-back wings. J. Fluids Engng 131 (11), 111101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, K., Hayostek, S., Amitay, M., He, W., Theofilis, V. & Taira, K. 2020 On the formation of three-dimensional separated flows over wings under tip effects. J. Fluid Mech. 895, A9.Google Scholar
Zhang, S., Jaworski, A. J., McParlin, S. C. & Turner, J. T. 2019 Experimental investigation of the flow structures over a $40^{\circ }$ swept wing. Aeronaut. J. 123 (1259), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar