Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:48:45.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Homogeneous turbulence in ferrofluids with a steady magnetic field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2008

KRISTOPHER R. SCHUMACHER ,
JAMES J. RILEY  and
BRUCE A. FINLAYSON
KRISTOPHER R. SCHUMACHER
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
JAMES J. RILEY
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
BRUCE A. FINLAYSON
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The general equations necessary for a basic theoretical interpretation of the physics of turbulence in ferrofluids are presented. The equations are examined and show multiple novel turbulence aspects that arise in ferrofluids. For example, two new modes of turbulent kinetic energy and turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate occur, and unique modes of energy conversion (rotational to/from translational kinetic energy and magnetic energy to/from turbulent kinetic energy) are exhibited in turbulent ferrofluid flows. Furthermore, it is shown that potential models for turbulence in ferrofluids are complicated by additional closure requirements from the five additional nonlinear terms in the governing equations. The equations are applied to turbulence of a ferrofluid in the presence of a steady magnetic field (as well as the case of no magnetic field) in order to identify the importance of the new terms. Results are presented for the enhanced anisotropy in the presence of a magnetic field, and results show how turbulence properties (both classical ones and new ones) vary with the strength of the magnetic field. Three different equations for the magnetization are examined and lead to different results at large magnitudes of the applied magnetic field.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 599 , 25 March 2008 , pp. 1 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anton, A. 1990 Measurements of turbulence suppression due to a transverse magnetic field applied on a ferrofluid motion. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 85, 137–140.Google Scholar
Bacri, J., Perzynski, R., Shliomis, M. & Burde, G. 1995 “Negative-viscosity” effect in a magnetic fluid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2128–2131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, M., Castelino, J., Huang, R., Shah, M. & Austin, R. 2001 Design of a microfabricated magnetic cell separator. Electrophoresis 22, 3883.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bou-Reslan, D. 2002 Brownian dynamics simulation of ferromagnetic fluid in the vicinity of a solid wall in simple shear flow. Masters Thesis, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
Brenner, H. & Nadim, A. 1996 The Lorentz reciprocal theorem for micropolar fluids. J. Engng Maths 30, 169–176.Google Scholar
Dahler, J. & Scriven, L. 1961 Angular momentum of continua. Nature 192, 36–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahler, J. & Scriven, L. 1963 Theory of structured continua. I. General consideration of angular momentum and polarization. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 275, 504–527.Google Scholar
Felderhof, B. 2001 Flow of a ferrofluid down a tube in an oscillating magnetic field. Phys. Rev. E 64, 21508.Google Scholar
Felderhof, B. & Kroh, H. 1999 Hydrodynamics of magnetic and dielectric fluids in interaction with the electromagnetic field. J. Chem. Phys. 110, 7403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, S., Graham, A., Abbott, J. & Brenner, H. 2006 Antisymmetric stresses in suspensions: Vortex viscosity and energy dissipation. J. Fluid Mech. 563, 97–122.Google Scholar
Gotoh, T., Fukayama, D. & Nakano, T. 2002 Velocity field statistics in homogeneous steady turbulence obtained using a high-resolution direct numerical simulation. Phys. Fluids 14, 1065.Google Scholar
Kamiyama, S. 1996 Pipe flow problems. In Magnetic Fluids and Applications Handbook (ed. Berkovski, B.), pp. 471–503. Begell House.Google Scholar
Kaneda, Y., Ishihara, T., Yokokawa, M., Itakura, K. & Uno, A. 2003 Energy dissipation rate and energy spectrum in high resolution direct numerical simulations of turbulence in a periodic box. Phys. Fluids 15, L21–L24.Google Scholar
Kerr, R. 1985 Higher-order derivative correlations and the alignment of small-scale structures in isotropic numerical turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 153, 31–58.Google Scholar
Krekhov, A., Shliomis, M. & Kamiyama, S. 2005 Ferrofluid pipe flow in an oscillating magnetic field. Phys. Fluids 17, 033105.Google Scholar
Lubbe, A., Alexiou, C. & Bergemann, C. 2001 Clinical applications of magnetic drug targeting. J. Surg. Res. 95, 200–206.Google Scholar
Martsenyuk, M., Raikher, Y. & Shliomis, M. 1974 On the kinetics of magnetization of suspensions of ferromagnetic particles. Sov. Phys. JETP 38, 413.Google Scholar
McComb, W. D. 1990 The Physics of Fluid Turbulence. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
McTague, J. 1969 Magnetoviscosity of magnetic colloids. J. Chem. Phys. 51, 133.Google Scholar
Moskowitz, R. & Rosensweig, R. 1967 Nonmechanical torque driven flow in magnetic suspensions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 11, 1967.Google Scholar
Odenbach, S. 2002 Magnetoviscous effects in ferrofluids. Lecture Notes in Physics, Monographs 71, Springer.Google Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramchand, C., Priyadarshini, P., Kopcansky, P. & Mehta, R. 2001 Application of magnetic fluids in medicine and biotechnology. Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 39, 683–686.Google Scholar
Roger, J., Pons, J., Massart, R., Halbreich, A. & Bacri, J. 1999 Some biomedical applications of ferrofluids. Eur. Phys. J. As 5, 321–325.Google Scholar
Rosensweig, R. E. 1985 Ferrohydrodynamics. Cambridge University Press; reprinted by Dover, Mineola, NY, 1997.Google Scholar
Schumacher, K. R. 2005 Direct numerical simulation of ferrofluid turbulence in magnetic fields. PhD Thesis, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Schumacher, K., Sellien, I., Knoke, G., Cader, T. & Finlayson, B. 2003 Experiment and simulation of laminar and turbulent ferrofluid pipe flow in an oscillating magnetic field. Phys. Rev. E 67, 26308.Google Scholar
Shliomis, M. 1972 Effective viscosity of magnetic suspensions. Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 1291–1294.Google Scholar
Shliomis, M. & Morozov, K. 1994 Negative viscosity of ferrofluid under alternating magnetic field. Phys. Fluids 6, 2855.Google Scholar
Snyder, S., Cader, T. & Finlayson, B. 2003 Finite element model of magnetoconvection of a ferrofluid. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 262, 269–279.Google Scholar
Sundaram, S. & Collins, L. 1997 Collision statistics in an isotropic particle-laden turbulent suspension. Part 1. Direct numerical simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 335, 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. & Green, A. 1937 Mechanism of the production of small eddies from large ones. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 158, 499–521.Google Scholar
Zahn, M. & Greer, D. 1995 Ferrohydrodynamic pumping in spatially uniform sinusoidally time-varying magnetic fields. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 149, 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeuner, A., Richter, R. & Rehberg, I. 1998 Experiments on negative and positive magnetoviscosity in an alternating magnetic field. Phys. Rev. E 58, 6287–6293.Google Scholar
Zikanov, O. & Thess, A. 1998 Direct numerical simulation of forced MHD turbulence at low magnetic Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 358, 299–333.Google Scholar