Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:25:29.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Global modes and transient response of a cold supersonic jet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

JOSEPH W. NICHOLS*
Affiliation:
Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-3035, USA
SANJIVA K. LELE
Affiliation:
Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-3035, USA Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4035, USA Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford, CA 94305-3030, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

Global-mode analysis is applied to a cold, M = 2.5 laminar jet. Global modes of the non-parallel jet capture directly both near-field dynamics and far-field acoustics which, in this case, are coupled by Mach wave radiation. In addition to type (a) modes corresponding to Kelvin–Helmholtz instability, it is found that the jet also supports upstream-propagating type (b) modes which could not be resolved by previous analyses of the parabolized stability equations. The locally neutrally propagating part of a type (a) mode consists of the growth and decay of an aerodynamic wavepacket attached to the jet, coupled with a beam of acoustic radiation at a low angle to the jet downstream axis. Type (b) modes are shown to be related to the subsonic family of modes predicted by Tam & Hu (1989). Finally, significant transient growth is recovered by superposing damped, but non-normal, global modes, leading to a novel interpretation of jet noise production. The mechanism of optimal transient growth is identified with a propagating aerodynamic wavepacket which emits an acoustic wavepacket to the far field at an axial location consistent with the peaks of the locally neutrally propagating parts of type (a) modes.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Åkervik, E., Hœpffner, J., Ehrenstein, U. & Henningson, D. S. 2007 Optimal growth, model reduction and control in a separated boundary-layer flow using global eigenmodes. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 305314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, L. C., Bodony, D. J. & Lele, S. K. 2007 Noise radiation predictions from jet instability waves using a hybrid nonlinear PSE-acoustic analogy approach. In Proceedings of the 13th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (28th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference). AIAA Paper 2007-3638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomaz, J.-M. 2005 Global instabilities in spatially developing flows: non-normality and nonlinearity. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 357392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, B.-T. 1965 On the energy transfer to small disturbances in fluid flow. Part I. Acta Mech. 1, 215234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cossu, C. & Chomaz, J.-M. 1997 Global measures of local convective instabilities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 43874390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crighton, D. G. 1978 Orderly structure as a source of jet exhaust noise: survey lecture. In Structure and Mechanisms of Turbulence II (ed. Fiedler, H.), Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 76, pp. 154170. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crighton, D. G. & Huerre, P. 1990 Shear-layer pressure fluctuations and superdirective acoustic sources. J. Fluid Mech. 220, 355368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenstein, U. & Gallaire, F. 2005 On two-dimensional temporal modes in spatially evolving open flows: the flat-plate boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 536, 209218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannetti, F. & Luchini, P. 2007 Structural sensitivity of the first instability of the cylinder wake. J. Fluid Mech. 581, 167197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanifi, A., Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 1996 Transient growth in compressible boundary layer flow. Phys. Fluids 8, 826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaton, C. J., Nichols, J. W. & Schmid, P. J. 2009 Global linear stability of the non-parallel batchelor vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 629, 139160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehoucq, R. B., Sorensen, D. C. & Yang, C. 1998 ARPACK Users' Guide: Solution of Large-Scale Eigenvalue Problems with Implicitly Restarted Arnoldi Methods. SIAM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X. S. & Demmel, J. W. 2003 SuperLU_DIST: a scalable distributed-memory sparse direct solver for unsymmetric linear systems. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 29 (2), 110140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, G. & Lele, S. K. 1996 A numerical investigation of skewed mixing layers. Tech Rep. TF-67. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Malik, M. & Chang, C.-L. 2000 Nonparallel and nonlinear stability of supersonic jet flow. Comput. Fluids 29, 327365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquet, O., Sipp, D. & Jacquin, L. 2008 Sensitivity analysis and passive control of cylinder flow. J. Fluid Mech. 615, 221252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalke, A. 1984 Survey on jet instability theory. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 21, 159199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, G. L. & McLaughlin, D. K. 1980 Instability process in low Reynolds number supersonic jets. AIAA J. 18, 793800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadarajah, S. & Jameson, A. 2000 A comparison of the continuous and discrete adjoint approach to automatic aerodynamic optimization. AIAA Paper AIAA-2000-0667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, J. W., Lele, S. K. & Moin, P. 2009 Global mode decomposition of supersonic jet noise. In Annual Research Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research (ed. Moin, P., Mansour, N. N. & Hahn, S.), pp. 315. Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 2001 Stability and Transition in Shear Flows. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. 1995 Supersonic jet noise. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 27, 1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. & Burton, D. E. 1984 Sound generated by instability waves of supersonic flows. Part 2. axisymmetric jets. J. Fluid Mech. 138, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tam, C. K. W. & Hu, F. Q. 1989 On the three families of instability waves of high-speed jets. J. Fluid Mech. 201, 447483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tumin, A. 2009 Toward the foundation of a global (bi-global) modes concept. In Global Flow Instability and Control IV, Creta Maris, Hersonissos, Crete (ed. Theofilis, V., Colonius, T. & Seifert, A.). ISBN-13: 978-84-692-6247-4.Google Scholar