Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T21:35:57.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Finite-size effects in forced two-dimensional turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Leslie M. Smithr
Affiliation:
Program in Applied and Computational Mathematics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA Present address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
Victor Yakhot
Affiliation:
Program in Applied and Computational Mathematics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA

Abstract

A new mechanism for the creation of structures in two-dimensional turbulence is investigated. The forced Navier-Stokes equations are solved numerically in a periodic square in the limit of zero viscosity. The force is a white-in-time random noise acting in a narrow band of high wavenumbers. The inverse-cascade process and the presence of the boundary lead ultimately to a pile-up of energy in the lowest wavenumber (Bose condensation). In the asymptotic limit where the enstrophy cascade range is negligible, Bose condensation is solely responsible for the generation of coherent vortices and intermittency in the system. We present the evolution of the velocity and vorticity fields through the later stages of the condensate state, and explore the possible implications for atmospheric turbulence constrained by the periodic domain about the earth.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benzi, R., Paternello, S. & Santangelo, P. 1988 Self-similar coherent structures in two-dimensional decaying turbulence. J. Phys. A 21, 12211237.Google Scholar
Boer, G. J. & Shepherd, T. G. 1983 Large-scale two-dimensional turbulence in the atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 40, 164184.Google Scholar
Charney, J. G. 1971 Geostrophic turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci. 28, 1087.Google Scholar
Chen, T.-C. & Wiin Nielsen, A., 1978 Nonlinear cascades of atmospheric energy and enstrophy in a two-dimensional spectral index. Tellus 30, 313322.Google Scholar
Flierl, G. R., Stern, M. E. & Whitehead, J. A. 1983 The physical significance of modons. Laboratory experiments and general integral constraints. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 7, 233263.Google Scholar
Frisch, U. & Sulem, P. L. 1984 Numerical simulation of the inverse cascade in two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids 27, 19211923.Google Scholar
Hossain, M., Matthaeus, W. H. & Montgomery, D. 1983 Long-time state of inverse cascades in the presence of a maximum length scale. J. Plasma Phys. 30, 479493.Google Scholar
Jackson, P. E., She, Z. S. & Orszag, S. A. 1991 A case study in parallel computing: homogeneous turbulence on a hypercube. J. Sci. Comput. 6, 27.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. N. 1941 Energy dissipation in locally isotropic turbulence. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 32, 1921.Google Scholar
Kornegay, F. C. & Vincent, D. G. 1976 Kinetic energy budget analysis during interaction of tropical storm Candy (1968) with an extratropical frontal system. Mon. Weather Rev. 104, 849859.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. 1967 Inertial ranges in two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids 10, 14171423.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. 1970 Diffusion by a random velocity field. Phys. Fluids 13, 2231.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. 1971 Inertial-range transfer in two- and three-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 47, 525535.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. 1974 Convection of a passive scalar by a quasi-uniform random straining field. J. Fluid Mech. 64, 737762.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. & Montgomery, D. 1980 Two-dimensional turbulence. Rep. Prog. Phys. 43, 547615.Google Scholar
Leith, C. E. 1971 Atmospheric predictability and two-dimensional turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci. 28, 145161.Google Scholar
Lilly, D. K. 1972 Numerical simulation studies of two-dimensional turbulence: I. Models of statistically steady turbulence. Geophys. Fluid Dyn. 3, 289319.Google Scholar
Lilly, D. K. 1989 Two-dimensional turbulence generated by energy sources at two scales. J. Atmos. Sci. 46, 20262030.Google Scholar
Lilly, D. K. & Peterson, E. L. 1983 Aircraft measurements of atmospheric kinetic energy spectra. Tellus 35A, 379382.Google Scholar
McWilliams, J. C. 1989 Statistical properties of decaying geostrophic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 198, 199230.Google Scholar
Maltrud, M. E. & Vallis, G. K. 1991 Energy spectra and coherent structures in forced twodimensional and beta-plane turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 228, 321342.Google Scholar
Melander, M. V., Zabusky, N. J. & McWilliams, J. C. 1987 Asymmetric vortex merger in two dimensions: Which vortex is ‘victorious’? Phys. Fluids 30, 26102612.Google Scholar
Melander, M. V., Zabusky, N. J. & McWilliams, J. C. 1988 Symmetric vortex merger in two dimensions: causes and conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 303340.Google Scholar
Monin, A. S. & Yaglom, A. M. 1975 Statistical Fluid Mechanics, vol. 2. MIT Press.
Nastrom, G. D., GAGE, K. S. & Jasperson, W. H. 1984 Kinetic energy spectrum of large-scale and mesoscale atmospheric processes. (Letter) Nature 310, 3638.Google Scholar
Overman, E. A. & Zabusky, N. J. 1982 Evolution and merger of isolated vortex structures. Phys. Fluids 25, 12971305.Google Scholar
Pedlosky, J. 1979 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Springer.
Rhines, P. B. 1975 Waves and turbulence on the β-plane. J. Fluid Mech. 69, 417443.Google Scholar
Salmon, R. 1978 Two-layer quasi-geostrophic turbulence in a simple special case. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 10, 2552.Google Scholar
Salmon, R. 1980 Baroclinic instability and geostrophic turbulence. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 15, 167211.Google Scholar
Smith, L. M. & Yakhot, V. 1993 Bose condensation and small-scale structure generation in a random force driven 2D turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 352355.Google Scholar
Vincent, D. G. & Schlatter, T. W. 1979 Evidence of deep convection as a source of synoptic-scale kinetic energy. Tellus 31, 493504.Google Scholar