Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:54:19.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evolution of solitary waves in a two-pycnocline system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2009

M. NITSCHE*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
P. D. WEIDMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0427, USA
R. GRIMSHAW
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK
M. GHRIST
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, USAF Academy, CO 80840-6252, USA
B. FORNBERG
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0526, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

Over two decades ago, some numerical studies and laboratory experiments identified the phenomenon of leapfrogging internal solitary waves located on separated pycnoclines. We revisit this problem to explore the behaviour of the near resonance phenomenon. We have developed a numerical code to follow the long-time inviscid evolution of isolated mode-two disturbances on two separated pycnoclines in a three-layer stratified fluid bounded by rigid horizontal top and bottom walls. We study the dependence of the solution on input system parameters, namely the three fluid densities and the two interface thicknesses, for fixed initial conditions describing isolated mode-two disturbances on each pycnocline. For most parameter values, the initial disturbances separate immediately and evolve into solitary waves, each with a distinct speed. However, in a narrow region of parameter space, the waves pair up and oscillate for some time in leapfrog fashion with a nearly equal average speed. The motion is only quasi-periodic, as each wave loses energy into its respective dispersive tail, which causes the spatial oscillation magnitude and period to increase until the waves eventually separate. We record the separation time, oscillation period and magnitude, and the final amplitudes and celerity of the separated waves as a function of the input parameters, and give evidence that no perfect periodic solutions occur. A simple asymptotic model is developed to aid in interpretation of the numerical results.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ablowitz, M. J. & Segur, H. 1981 Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Transform. SIAM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akylas, T. R. & Grimshaw, R. H. J. 1992 Solitary internal waves with oscillatory tails. J. Fluid Mech. 242, 279298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1967 Internal waves of permanent form in fluids of great depth. J. Fluid Mech. 29, 559592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, R. E. & Acrivos, A. 1967 Solitary internal waves in deep water. J. Fluid Mech. 29, 593607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwight, H. B. 1961 Table of Integrals and other Mathematical Data, 4th edn. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fermi, E., Pasta, J. R. & Ulam, S. M. 1955 Studies of nonlinear problems. Los Alamos Sci. Lab. Rep. LA-1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornberg, B. & Driscoll, T. A. 1999 A fast spectral algorithm for nonlinear wave equations with linear dispersion. J. Comput. Phys. 155, 456467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gear, J. A. & Grimshaw, R. 1984 Weak and strong interactions between internal solitary waves. Stud. Appl. Math. 70, 235258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, R. 2001 Internal solitary waves. In Environmental Stratified Flows (ed. Grimshaw, R.), ch. 1, pp. 129. Kluwer.Google Scholar
Helfrich, K. R & Melville, W. K. 2006 Long nonlinear internal waves. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38, 395425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, R. I. 1977 Solitary waves in finite depth fluid. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 10 (12), L225L227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keulegan, G. H. 1948 Gradual damping of solitary waves. Natl Bur. Sci. J. Res. 40, 487498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubota, T., Ko, D. R. S. & Dobbs, L. D. 1978 Weakly-nonlinear, long internal gravity waves in stratified fluids of finite depth. J. Hydronaut. 12, 157165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, A. K., Kubota, T. & Ko, D. R. S. 1980 Resonant transfer of energy between nonlinear waves in neighbouring pycnoclines. Stud. Appl. Math. 63, 2545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, A. K., Pereira, N. R. & Ko, D. R. S. 1982 Weakly interacting internal solitary waves in neighbouring pycnoclines. J. Fluid Mech. 122, 187194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malomed, B. A. 1987 “Leapfrogging” solitons in a system of coupled KdV equations. Wave Motion 9, 401411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ono, H. 1975 Algebraic solitary waves in stratified fluids. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 39, 10821091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segur, H. 1973 The Korteweg–de Vries equation and water waves. Solutions of the equation. Part I. J. Fluid Mech. 59, 721736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidman, P. D. & Johnson, M. 1982 Experiments on leapfrogging internal solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 122, 195213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidman, P. D. & Maxworthy, T. 1978 Experiments on strong interactions between solitary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 85 (3), 417431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. D. & Scheel, A. 2007 Solitary waves and their linear stability in weakly coupled KdV equations. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 58, 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar