Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T06:18:34.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of turbulence on a separated and reattaching flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

Yasuharu Nakamura  and
Shigehira Ozono
Yasuharu Nakamura
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, Kasuga 816, Japan
Shigehira Ozono
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, Kasuga 816, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of free-stream turbulence on the mean pressure distribution along the separation bubble formed on a flat plate with rectangular leading-edge geometry is investigated experimentally in a wind tunnel using turbulence-producing grids. Emphasis is placed on finding the effect of turbulence scale. The ratio of turbulence scale to plate thickness investigated was about 0.5 to 24 for two values of turbulence intensity of about 7 and 11%. The Reynolds number based on plate thickness was approximately (1.4–4.2) × 104.

It is found that the main effect of free-stream turbulence is to shorten the separation bubble. It is progressively shortened with increasing turbulence intensity. The mean pressure distribution along the shortened separation bubble is insensitive to changing turbulence scale up to a scale ratio of about 2. With further increase in the scale ratio it asymptotes towards the smooth-flow distribution. There is no trace of interaction between turbulence and vortex shedding (the impinging-shear-layer instability) in the mean pressure distribution.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 178 , May 1987 , pp. 477 - 490
Copyright
© 1987 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bearan, P. W. 1978 In Proc. 3rd US Natl Conf. Wind Engng Res., Univ. Florida (ed. B. M. Leadon), pp. 265–272. University of Florida.
Bearman, P. W. & Morel, T. 1983 Prog. Aero. Sci. 20, 97–123.
Cherry, N. J., Hillier, R. & Latour, M. E. M. P. 1983 J. Wind Engng Indust. Aero. 11, 95–105.
Cherry, N. J., Hillier, R. & Latour, M. E. M. P. 1984 J. Fluid Mech. 144, 13–46.
Hillier, R. 1976 CERL Rep. Rd/L/N242/75.
Hillier, R. & Cherry, N. J. 1981 J. Wind Engng Indust. Aero 8, 49–58.
Kiya, M., & Sasaki, K. 1984 Bull. Japan Soc. Mech. Engnrs 50, 1483–1490 (in Japanese).
Kiya, M., Sasaki, K. & Arie, M. 1984 Bull. Japan Soc. Mech. Engnrs 50, 967–973 (in Japanese).
Maskell, E. C. 1965 Aero. Res. Counc. R & M 3400.
Nakamura, Y. & Nakashima, M. 1986 J. Fluid Mech. 163, 149–169.
Nakamura, Y. & Ohya, Y. 1983 J. Fluid Mech. 137, 331–345.
Nakamura, Y. & Ohya, Y. 1984 J. Fluid Mech. 149, 255–273.
Nakamura, Y. & Ohya, Y. 1986 J. Fluid Mech. 164, 77–89.
Norbury, J. F. & Crabtree, L. F. 1955 RAE Tech. Note Aero 2352.
Roshko, A. & Lau, J. K. 1965 In Proc. 1965 Heat Transfer and Fluid Mech. Inst. (ed. A. F. Charwat), pp. 157–167. Stanford University Press.