Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T22:03:05.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of acoustic excitation on the flow over a low-Re airfoil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

K. B. M. Q. Zaman ,
A. Bar-Sever  and
S. M. Mangalam
K. B. M. Q. Zaman
Affiliation:
ESCON, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23665, USA
A. Bar-Sever
Affiliation:
ESCON, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23665, USA
S. M. Mangalam
Affiliation:
AS & M Inc., NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23665, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Wind-tunnel measurements of lift, drag and wake velocity spectra were carried out under (tonal) acoustic excitation for a smooth airfoil in the chord-Reynolds-number (Rec) range of 4 × 104−1.4 × 105. The data are supported by smoke-wire flowvisualization pictures. Small-amplitude excitation in a wide, low-frequency range is found to eliminate laminar separation that otherwise degrades the airfoil performance at low Rec near the design angle of attack. Excitation at high frequencies, scaling as $U_{\infty}^{\frac{3}{2}}$, eliminates a pre-stall, periodic shedding of large-scale vortices; U∞ is the free-stream velocity. Significant improvement in lift is also achieved during post-stall, but with large-amplitude excitation. Wind-tunnel resonances strongly influence the results, especially in cases requiring large amplitudes. It is shown that large transverse velocity fluctuations, induced near the airfoil by specific cross-resonance modes, lead to the most effective separation control; resonances inducing only large-amplitude pressure fluctuations are demonstrated to be less effective.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 182 , September 1987 , pp. 127 - 148
Copyright
© 1987 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahuja, K. K. & Burrin, R. H. 1984 Control of flow separation by sound. AIAA Paper No. 84–2298.
Brooks, T. F. & Schlinker, R. H. 1983 Progress in rotor broadband noise research. Vertica 7, 287–307.Google Scholar
Carmichael, B. H. 1981 Low Reynolds number airfoil survey: vol. I, NASA Contractor Report No. 165803.
Cendenese, A., Cerri, G. & Iannetta, S. 1981 Experimental analysis of the wake behind an isolated cambered airfoil. Proc. IUTAM Symp. Unsteady Turbulent Shear Flows, pp. 273–284. Springer.
Collins, F. G. & Zelenevitz, J. 1975 Influence of sound upon separated flow over wings. AIAA J. 13, 408–410.Google Scholar
Crighton, D. G. 1981 Acoustics as a branch of fluid mechanics. J. Fluid Mech. 106, 261–298.Google Scholar
Davis, S. S. 1975 Measurements of discrete vortex noise in a closed-throat wind tunnel. AIAA Paper No. 75–488.
Eppler, R. & Somers, D. M. 1980 A computer program for the design and analysis of low-speed airfoils. NASA TM-80210.
Gedney, J. G. 1983 The cancellation of a sound-excited Tollmien—Schlichting wave with plate vibration. Phys. Fluids 26, 1158–1161.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. 1976 Aeroacoustics. McGraw-Hill.
Goldstein, M. E. 1984 Generation of instability waves in flows separating from smooth surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 145, 71–94.Google Scholar
Leehey, P. & Shapiro, P. 1977 Leading edge effect in laminar boundary layer excitation by sound. Proc. IUTAM Symp. Laminar Turbulent Transition, pp. 321–331. Springer.
Lissaman, P. B. S. 1983 Low-Reynolds-number airfoils. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 15, 223–239.Google Scholar
Maestrello, L. 1985 Active transition fixing and control of the boundary layer in air. AIAA Paper No. 85–0564.
Mangalam, S. M. & Pfenninger, W. 1984 Wind-tunnel tests on a high performance low-Reynolds number airfoil. AIAA Paper No. 84–0628.
Marchman, J. F., Sumantran, V. & Schaefer, C. G. 1987 Acoustic and turbulence influences on stall hysteresis. AIAA J. 25, 50–51.Google Scholar
Mechel, F., Mertens, P. & Schilz, W. 1963 Research of sound propagation in sound-absorbent ducts with superimposed air streams. Technical Documentary Rep. No. AMRL-TDR-62–140 (IV), University of Goettingen, FRG.
Michalke, A. 1965 On spatially growing disturbances in an inviscid shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 23, 521–544.Google Scholar
Mueller, T. J. 1985 Low Reynolds number vehicles. AGARD-AG-288.
Mueller, T. J. & Batill, S. M. 1982 Experimental studies of separation of a two-dimensional airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA J. 20, 457–463.Google Scholar
Nishioka, M. & Morkovin, M. V. 1985 Boundary layer receptivity to unsteady pressure gradients: experiments and overview. J. Fluid Mech. 171, 219–261.Google Scholar
Parker, R. 1966 Resonance effects in wake shedding from parallel plates: some experimental observations. J. Sound Vib. 4, 62–72.Google Scholar
Pfenninger, W. 1977 Laminar flow control: laminarization. AGARD-R-654, pp. 3.1–3.75.
Roshko, A. 1954 On the drag and shedding frequency of two-dimensional bluff bodies. NACA Tech. Note 3169.
Rumsey, C. L. 1987 A computational analysis of flow separation over five different airfoil geometries at high angles-of-attack. AIAA Paper No. 87–0188.
Schlichting, H. 1979 Boundary Layer Theory. McGraw-Hill.
Srokowski, A. J. & Orszag, S. A. 1977 Mass flow requirements for LFC wing design. AIAA Paper No. 77–1222.
Tam, C. K. W. 1978 Excitation of instability waves in a two-dimensional shear layer by sound. J. Fluid Mech. 89, 357–371.Google Scholar
Zaman, K. B. M. Q. & Hussain, A. K. M. F. 1981 Turbulence suppression in free shear flow by controlled excitation. J. Fluid Mech. 103, 133–160.Google Scholar