Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T06:51:27.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dispersion of a passive solute in non-ergodic transport by steady velocity fields in heterogeneous formations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Gedeon Dagan
Gedeon Dagan
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An inert solute is convected by a steady random velocity field, which is associated with flow through a heterogeneous porous formation. The log conductivity and the velocity are stationary random space functions. The log conductivity Y is assumed to be normal, with an isotropic two-point correlation of variance σY2 and of finite integral scale I. The solute cloud is of a finite input zone of lengthscale l. The transport is characterized with the aid of the spatial moments of the solute body. The effective dispersion coefficient is defined as half of the rate of change with time of the second spatial moment with respect to the centroid. Under the ergodic hypothesis, which is bound to be satisfied for l/I [Gt ] 1, the centroid moves with the mean velocity U and the longitudinal dispersion coefficient [dscr ]L tends to its constant, Fickian, limit. Under a Lagrangian first-order analysis in σY2 it has been found that [dscr ]L = σY2UI.

This study addresses the computation of the effective longitudinal dispersion coefficient for a finite input zone, for which ergodic conditions may not be satisfied. In this case the centroid trajectory and the second spatial moments are random variables. In line with a previous work (Dagan 1990) the effective dispersion coefficient DL is defined as half the rate of change of the expected value of the second spatial moment for large transport time. The aim of the study is to derive DL and its dependence upon l/I and in particular to determine the conditions under which it tends to the ergodic limit [dscr ]L. The computation is carried out separately for a thin body aligned with the mean flow and one transverse to it. In the first case it is found that DL is equal to zero, i.e. the streamlined body does not disperse in the mean. This result is explained by the correlation between the trajectories of the leading and trailing edges, respectively, once the latter reaches the position of the first. The relatively modest increase of the mean second spatial moment is effectively computed. In the case of a thin body initially transverse to the mean flow, DL may reach the ergodic limit [dscr ]L for a ratio l/I of the order 102. For smaller values, DL is found to be bounded from above, and its maximum depends on l but not on I. The uncertainty caused by the randomness of the velocity field is manifested in the trajectory of the centroid rather than in the effective dispersion.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 233 , December 1991 , pp. 197 - 210
Copyright
© 1991 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1965 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.
Bouchaud, J.-P., Georges, A., Koplik, J., Provata, A. & Redner, S. 1990 Superdiffusion in random velocity fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2503–2506.Google Scholar
Dagan, G. 1982a Stochastic modelling of groundwater flow by unconditional and conditional probabilities 2. The solute transport. Water Resour. Res. 18, 835–848.Google Scholar
Dagan, G. 1982b Analysis of flow through heterogeneous random aquifer 2. Unsteady flow in confined formations. Water Resour. Res. 18, 1571–1585.Google Scholar
Dagan, G. 1984 Solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations. J. Fluid Mech. 145, 151–177.Google Scholar
Dagan, G. 1986 Statistical theory of groundwater flow and transport: pore to laboratory, laboratory to formation and formation to regional scale. Water Resour. Res. 22, 120S–125S.Google Scholar
Dagan, G. 1987 Theory of solute transport by groundwater. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 19, 183–215.Google Scholar
Dagan, G. 1989 Flow and Transport in Porous Formations. Springer.
Dagan, G. 1990 Transport in heterogeneous formations: spatial moments, ergodicity and effective dispersion. Water Resour. Res. 26, 1281–1290.Google Scholar
Delhomme, J. P. 1979 Spatial variability and uncertainty in groundwater flow parameters: a geostatistical approach. Water Resour. Res. 15, 269–280.Google Scholar
Freyberg, D. L. 1986 A natural experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer. 2. Spatial moments and the advection and dispersion of nonreactive tracers. Water Resour. Res. 22, 2031–2046.Google Scholar
Garabedian, S. P. 1987 Large-scale dispersive transport in aquifers: field experiments and reactive transport theory. Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T
Gelhar, L. J. & Axness, C. L. 1983 Three-dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 19, 161–180.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, R. J. & Kitanidis, P. K. 1984 An application of the geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in two dimensional ground water modelling. Water Resour. Res. 20, 1009–1020.Google Scholar
Kitanidis, P. K. 1988 Prediction by the method of moments of transport in a heterogeneous formation. J. Hydrol. 102, 453–473.Google Scholar
Lumley, J. L. 1962 The mathematical nature of the problem of relating Lagrangian and Eulerian statistical functions in turbulence. In Mecanique de la Turbulence (ed. A. Favre), pp. 17–26, Paris: CNRS.
Matheron, G. & Marsily, G. de 1980 Is transport in porous media always diffusive? A counterexample. Water Resour. Res. 16, 901–917.Google Scholar
Neuman, S. P. 1990 Universal scaling of hydraulic conductivities and dispersivities in geologic media. Water Resour. Res. 26, 1749–1758.Google Scholar
Neuman, S. P., Winter, C. L. & Newman, C. M. 1987 Stochastic theory of field-scale Fickian dispersion in anisotropic porous media. Water Resour. Res. 23, 453–466.Google Scholar
Philip, J. R. 1986 Issues in flow and transport in heterogenous porous media. Transport in Porous Media 1, 319–338.Google Scholar
Quinodoz, H. A. M. & Valocchi, A. J. 1991 Macrodispersion in heterogeneous aquifers: numerical experiments In Proc. Conf. on Transport and Mass Exchange Processes in Sand and Gravel Aquifers: Field and Modeling Studies, Ottawa, Oct. 1990.
Rubin, Y. 1990 Stochastic modelling of macrodispersion in heterogeneous porous media. Water Resour. Res. 26, 133–142.Google Scholar
Sudicky, E. A. 1986 A natural-gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and its role in the dispersion process. Water Resour. Res. 22, 2069–2082.Google Scholar
Valocchi, A. J. 1990 Numerical simulation of the transport of absorbing solutes in heterogeneous aquifers. In Computational Methods in Subsurface Hydrology (ed. G. Gambolati, A. Rinaldo, C. A. Brebbia, W. C. Gray & G. F. Pinder), pp. 373–382. Computational Mechanics Publications and Springer.