Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:58:38.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Deformation and breakup of a single slender drop in an extensional flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2006

Andreas Acrivos
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305
T. S. Lo
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 Present address: Sun Oil co., Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania.

Abstract

The deformation and conditions for breakup of a single slender drop placed symmetrically in a uniaxial extensional flow are examined theoretically. For the case of an inviscid drop in zero-Reynolds-number flow, Buckmaster (1972) showed, using slender-body analysis, that the shape of the drop is given by r≡εR(z)=ε(1−|z|ν)/2ν, where εεγ/Gμl and γ is the interfacial tension, G the strength of the extensional flow, μ the viscosity of the suspending fluid and l the drop half-length; also v = ½P − 1, where P is the unknown constant pressure inside the drop rendered dimensionless with respect to Gμ. By requiring that R be analytic at z = 0, Buckmaster then concluded that v had to be an even integer and thereby obtained a countably infinite set of slender profiles for any (large) value of the flow strength G. In the present work, the expression for R(z) shown above is obtained readily using the method of inner and outer expansions, the method failing when |z|[les ]O(ε) and ν is not an even integer. Thus, in general, a new solution is needed to describe the shape within the ‘singular’ region |z|[les ]O(ε). The requirement that the two solutions match in their domain of overlap then leads to the conclusion that v can be either equal to 2 or greater than or equal to 3. However, a stability analysis reveals that only the solution with v = 2 is stable, and hence a unique shape exists.

Next, drops of low viscosity μi = O2μ) are examined in zero-Reynolds-number flow. Here, again, a unique solution is obtained according to which a steady shape cannot exist if (Gμa/γ) (μi/μ) > 0·148, where $a \equiv(3V4\pi)^{\frac{1}{3}}$ and V is the volume of the drop. This breakup criterion is identical to that found by Taylor (1964). A similar analysis for the case of an inviscid drop in a flow with non-zero Reynolds number shows that drop breakup will occur if $(G\mu a/\gamma) (\rho a\gamma/\mu^2)^{\frac{1}{5}} > 0.284$, where ρ is the density of the suspending fluid. Finally, when μi = O2μ) and inertial effects are neglected within the drop but retained in the surrounding fluid, the critical value of $(G\mu a/\gamma) (\rho a\gamma/\mu^2)^{\frac{1}{5}}$ required for drop breakup is found as a function of the dimensionless group \[ (\rho a\gamma/\mu^2)^{\frac{1}{5}}(\mu/\mu_i)^{\frac{1}{6}}, \] which depends only on the physical properties of the system and the size of the drop. These last two results are the first which take into account inertial effects in determining the deformation and breakup conditions of a drop placed in a shear field.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1978 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barthès-Biesel, D. & Acrivos, A. 1973a The rheology of suspensions and its relation to phenomenological theories for non-Newtonian fluids. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 1, 1.Google Scholar
Barthès-Biesel, D. & Acrivos, A. 1973b Deformation and burst of a liquid droplet freely suspended in a linear shear field. J. Fluid Mech. 61, 1.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1970 Slender-body theory for particles of arbitrary cross-section in Stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 419.Google Scholar
Buckmaster, J. D. 1972 Pointed bubbles in slow viscous flow. J. Fluid Mech. 55, 385.Google Scholar
Buckmaster, J. D. 1973 The bursting of pointed drops in slow viscous flow. J. Appl. Mech. E 40, 18.Google Scholar
Cox, R. G. 1969 The deformation of a drop in a general time dependent fluid flow. J. Fluid Mech. 37, 601.Google Scholar
Grace, H. P. 1971 Dispersion phenomena in high viscosity immiscible fluid systems and application of static mixers as dispersion devices in such systems. Engng Found. 3rd Res. Conf. Mixing. Andover, New Hampshire.
Gradshteyn, I. S. & Ryzhik, I. M. 1965 Tables of Integrals, Series and Products. Academic Press.
Keller, J. B. & Rubinow, S. I. 1976 Slender body theory for slow viscous flow. J. Fluid Mech. 75, 705.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1958 Fourier Analysis and Generalised Functions. Cambridge University Press.
Rumscheidt, F. D. & Mason, S. G. 1961 Particle motion in sheared suspensions. XII. Deformation and burst of fluid drops in shear and hyperbolic flow. J. Colloid Sci. 16, 238.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1932 The viscosity of a fluid containing small drops of another fluid. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 138, 41.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1934 The formation of emulsions in definable fields of flow. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 146, 501.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1964 Conical free surfaces and fluid interfaces. Proc. 11th Int. Cong. Appl. Mech., Munich.Google Scholar
Tillett, J. P. K. 1970 Axial and transverse Stokes flow past slender axisymmetric bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 401.Google Scholar
Torza, S., Cox, R. G. & Mason, S. G. 1972 Particle motion in sheared suspensions XXVII. Transient and steady deformation and burst of liquid drops. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 38, 395.Google Scholar
Youngren, G. K. & Acrivos, A. 1976 On the shape of a gas bubble in a viscous extensional flow. J. Fluid Mech. 76, 433.Google Scholar