Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:37:30.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Controlling the onset of turbulence by streamwise travelling waves. Part 2. Direct numerical simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2010

BINH K. LIEU ,
RASHAD MOARREF  and
MIHAILO R. JOVANOVIĆ
BINH K. LIEU
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
RASHAD MOARREF
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
MIHAILO R. JOVANOVIĆ*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study builds on and confirms the theoretical findings of Part 1 of this paper (Moarref & Jovanović, J. Fluid Mech., 2010, doi:10.1017/S0022112010003393). We use direct numerical simulation of the Navier–Stokes equations to assess the efficacy of blowing and suction in the form of streamwise travelling waves for controlling the onset of turbulence in a channel flow. We highlight the effects of the modified base flow on the dynamics of velocity fluctuations and net power balance. Our simulations verify the theoretical predictions of Part 1 that the upstream travelling waves promote turbulence even when the uncontrolled flow stays laminar. On the other hand, the downstream travelling waves with parameters selected in Part 1 are capable of reducing the fluctuations' kinetic energy, thereby maintaining the laminar flow. In flows driven by a fixed pressure gradient, a positive net efficiency as large as 25 % relative to the uncontrolled turbulent flow can be achieved with downstream waves. Furthermore, we show that these waves can also relaminarize fully developed turbulent flows at low Reynolds numbers. We conclude that the theory developed in Part 1 for the linearized flow equations with uncertainty has considerable ability to predict full-scale phenomena.

JFM classification

Flow Control: Flow Control Instability: Transition to turbulence Turbulent Flows: Turbulence control
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 663 , 25 November 2010 , pp. 100 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bewley, T. R. 2009 A fundamental limit on the balance of power in a transpiration-controlled channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 632, 443–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borrero-Echeverry, D., Schatz, M.F. & Tagg, R. 2010 Transient turbulence in Taylor–Couette flow. Phys. Rev. E 81 (2), 25301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brosa, U. 1989 Turbulence without strange attractor. J. Stat. Phys. 55 (5), 1303–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canuto, C., Hussaini, M. Y., Quarteroni, A. & Zang, T. A. 1988 Spectral Methods in Fluid Dynamics. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, I. G. 2003 Fundamental Mechanics of Fluids. CRC Press.Google Scholar
Fukagata, K., Sugiyama, K. & Kasagi, N. 2009 On the lower bound of net driving power in controlled duct flows. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom. 238 (13), 1082–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, J. F. 2007 Channelflow: a spectral Navier–Stokes solver in C++. Tech. Rep., Georgia Institute of Technology, www.channelflow.org.Google Scholar
Grossmann, S. 2000 The onset of shear flow turbulence. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 603–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hœpffner, J. & Fukagata, K. 2009 Pumping or drag reduction? J. Fluid Mech. 635, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hof, B., Westerweel, J., Schneider, T. M. & Eckhardt, B. 2006 Finite lifetime of turbulence in shear flows. Nature 443 (7), 59–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiménez, J., Kawahara, G., Simens, M. P., Nagata, M. & Shiba, M. 2005 Characterization of near-wall turbulence in terms of equilibrium and ‘bursting’ solutions. Phys. Fluids 17 (1), 015105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanović, M. R. 2008 Turbulence suppression in channel flows by small amplitude transverse wall oscillations. Phys. Fluids 20 (1), 014101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovanović, M. R., Moarref, R. & You, D. 2006 Turbulence suppression in channel flows by means of a streamwise traveling wave. In Proceedings of the 2006 Summer Program, pp. 481–494. Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University/NASA.Google Scholar
Kerswell, R. R. 2005 Recent progress in understanding the transition to turbulence in a pipe. Nonlinearity 18, R17–R44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusic, I., Joseph, D. D. & Mahesh, K. 2007 Laminar and turbulent comparisons for channel flow and flow control. J. Fluid Mech. 570, 467–477.Google Scholar
Min, T., Kang, S. M., Speyer, J.L. & Kim, J. 2006 Sustained sub-laminar drag in a fully developed channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 558, 309–318.Google Scholar
Moarref, R. & Jovanović, M. R. 2010 Controlling the onset of turbulence by streamwise travelling waves. Part 1. Receptivity analysis. J. Fluid Mech. 663, 70–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyret, R. 2002 Spectral Methods for Incompressible Viscous Flow. Springer.Google Scholar
Quadrio, M. & Ricco, P. 2004 Critical assessment of turbulent drag reduction through spanwise wall oscillations. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 251–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 2001 Stability and Transition in Shear Flows. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotti, A. & Piomelli, U. 2001 Numerical simulation of pulsating turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 13 (5), 1367–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waleffe, F. 2001 Exact coherent structures in channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 435, 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar