Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:32:02.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coherent structure of the convective boundary layer derived from large-eddy simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Helmut Schmidt  and
Ulrich Schumann
Helmut Schmidt
Affiliation:
DLR, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, D-8031 Oberpfaffenhofen, Federal Republic of Germany
Ulrich Schumann
Affiliation:
DLR, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, D-8031 Oberpfaffenhofen, Federal Republic of Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Turbulence in the convective boundary layer (CBL) uniformly heated from below and topped by a layer of uniformly stratified fluid is investigated for zero mean horizontal flow using large-eddy simulations (LES). The Rayleigh number is effectively infinite, the Froude number of the stable layer is 0.09 and the surface roughness height relative to the height of the convective layer is varied between 10−6 and 10−2. The LES uses a finite-difference method to integrate the three-dimensional grid-volume-averaged Navier–Stokes equations for a Boussinesq fluid. Subgrid-scale (SGS) fluxes are determined from algebraically approximated second-order closure (SOC) transport equations for which all essential coefficients are determined from the inertial-range theory. The surface boundary condition uses the Monin–Obukhov relationships. A radiation boundary condition at the top of the computational domain prevents spurious reflections of gravity waves. The simulation uses 160 × 160 × 48 grid cells. In the asymptotic state, the results in terms of vertical mean profiles of turbulence statistics generally agree very well with results available from laboratory and atmospheric field experiments. We found less agreement with respect to horizontal velocity fluctuations, pressure fluctuations and dissipation rates, which previous investigations tend to overestimate. Horizontal spectra exhibit an inertial subrange. The entrainment heat flux at the top of the CBL is carried by cold updraughts and warm downdraughts in the form of wisps at scales comparable with the height of the boundary layer. Plots of instantaneous flow fields show a spoke pattern in the lower quarter of the CBL which feeds large-scale updraughts penetrating into the stable layer aloft. The spoke pattern has also been found in a few previous investigations. Small-scale plumes near the surface and remote from strong updraughts do not merge together but decay while rising through large-scale downdraughts. The structure of updraughts and downdraughts is identified by three-dimensional correlation functions and conditionally averaged fields. The mean circulation extends vertically over the whole boundary layer. We find that updraughts are composed of quasi-steady large-scale plumes together with transient rising thermals which grow in size by lateral entrainment. The skewness of the vertical velocity fluctuations is generally positive but becomes negative in the lowest mesh cells when the dissipation rate exceeds the production rate due to buoyancy near the surface, as is the case for very rough surfaces. The LES results are used to determine the root-mean-square value of the surface friction velocity and the mean temperature difference between the surface and the mixed layer as a function of the roughness height. The results corroborate a simple model of the heat transfer in the surface layer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 200 , March 1989 , pp. 511 - 562
Copyright
© 1989 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrian, R. J., Ferreira, R. T. D. S. & Boberg, T. 1986 Turbulent thermal convection in wide horizontal fluid layers. Exps Fluids 4, 121–141.Google Scholar
André, J. C., De Moor, G., Lacarrerre, P., Therry, G. & du Vachat, R. 1978 Modeling the 24-hour evolution of the mean and turbulent structures of the planetary boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 35, 1861–1883.Google Scholar
Andreas, E. L.: 1987 Spectral measurements in a disturbed boundary layer over snow. J. Atmos. Sci. 44, 1912–1939.Google Scholar
Bougeault, P.: 1983 A non-reflective upper boundary condition for limited-height hydrostatic models. Man. Wea. Rev. 111, 420–429.Google Scholar
Businger, J. A.: 1973 A note on free convection. Boundary-Layer Met. 4, 323–326.Google Scholar
Busse, F. H.: 1978 Non-linear properties of thermal convection. Rep. Prog. Phys. 41, 1930–1967.Google Scholar
Busse, F. H. & Whitehead, J. A., 1974 Oscillatory and collective instabilities in large Prandtl number convection. J. Fluid Mech. 66, 67–79.Google Scholar
Carruthers, D. J. & Moeng, C.-H. 1987 Waves in the overlying inversion of the convective boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 44, 1801–1808.Google Scholar
Caughey, S. J.: 1982 Observed characteristics of the atmospheric boundary layer. In Atmospheric Turbulence and Air Pollution Modelling (ed. F. T. M. Nieuwstadt & H. van Dop), pp. 107–158. Reidel.
Caughey, S. J. & Palmer, S. G., 1979 Some aspects of turbulence structure through the depth of the convective boundary layer. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 105, 811–827.Google Scholar
Chatfield, R. B. & Brost, R. A., 1987 A two-stream model of the vertical transport of trace species in the convective boundary layer. J. Geophys. Res. 92, D11, 13263–13276.Google Scholar
Chen, C. & Cotton, W. R., 1983 Numerical experiments with a one-dimensional higher order turbulence model: Simulation of the Wangara day 33 case. Boundary-Layer Met. 25, 374–404.Google Scholar
Coulman, C. E.: 1970 Fluctuations of horizontal wind speed near the ground in convective conditions. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 96, 529–534.Google Scholar
Crum, T. D., Stull, R. B. & Eloranta, E. W., 1987 Coincident Lidar and aircraft observations of entrainment into thermals and mixed layers. J. Clim. Appl. Met. 26, 774–778.Google Scholar
Deardorff, J. W.: 1970 Convective velocity and temperature scales for the unstable planetary boundary layer and for Rayleigh convection. J. Atmos. Sci. 27, 1211–1213.Google Scholar
Deardorff, J. W.: 1971 On the magnitude of the subgrid scale eddy coefficient. J. Comput. Phys. 7, 120–133.Google Scholar
Deardorff, J. W.: 1972 Numerical investigation of neutral and unstable planetary boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci. 29, 91–115.Google Scholar
Deardorff, J. W.: 1973 The use of subgrid transport equations in a three-dimensional model of atmospheric turbulence. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 95, 429–438.Google Scholar
Deardorff, J. W.: 1974 Three-dimensional numerical study of turbulence in an entraining mixed layer. Boundary-Layer Met. 7, 199–226.Google Scholar
Deardorff, J. W.: 1980 Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model. Boundary-Layer Met. 18, 495–527.Google Scholar
Deardorff, J. W. & Willis, G. E., 1985 Further results from a laboratory model of the convective planetary boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Met. 32, 205–236.Google Scholar
Druilhet, A., Frangi, J. P., Guedalia, D. & Fontan, J., 1983 Experimental studies of the turbulence structure parameters of the convective boundary layer. J. Clim. Appl. Met. 22, 594–608.Google Scholar
Dyer, A. J.: 1974 A review of flux-profile relationships. Boundary-Layer Met. 7, 363–372.Google Scholar
Finger, J. E. & Schmidt, H., 1986 On the efficiency of higher order turbulence models simulating the convective boundary layer. Beitr. Phys. Atm. 59, 505–517.Google Scholar
Frisch, A. S. & Businger, J. A., 1973 A study of convective elements in the atmospheric surface layer. Boundary-Layer Met. 3, 301–328.Google Scholar
Frisch, A. S., Chadwick, R. B., Moninger, W. R. & Young, J. M., 1976 Observations of boundary-layer convection cells measured by dual-doppler radar and echosonde and by microbarograph array. Boundary-Layer Met. 10, 55–68.Google Scholar
Gal-Chen, T. & Kropfli, R. A. 1984 Buoyancy and pressure perturbations derived from dual-doppler radar observations of the planetary boundary layer: Applications for matching models with observations. J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 3007–3020.Google Scholar
Gerz, T., Schumann, U. & Elghobashi, S. E., 1989 Direct numerical simulation of stratified homogeneous turbulent shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 200, 563–594.Google Scholar
Gibson, M. M. & Launder, B. E., 1976 On the calculation of horizontal, turbulent, free shear flows under gravitational influence. Trans. ASME C: J. Heat Transfer 98, 81–87.Google Scholar
Grossman, R. L.: 1982 An analysis of vertical velocity spectra obtained in the BOMEX fair-weather, trade-wind boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Met. 23, 323–357.Google Scholar
Grossman, R. L.: 1984 Bivariate conditional sampling of moisture flux over a tropical ocean. J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 3238–3253.Google Scholar
Greenhut, G. K. & Khalsa, S. J. S. 1982 Updraft and downdraft events in the atmospheric boundary layer over the equatorial Pacific Ocean. J. Atmos. Sci. 39, 1803–1818.Google Scholar
Greenhut, G. K. & Khalsa, S. J. S. 1987 Convective elements in the marine atmospheric boundary layer. Part I: Conditional sampling statistics. J. Clim. Appl. Met. 26, 813–822.Google Scholar
Greenhut, G. K. & Khalsa, S. J. S. 1987 Convective elements in the marine atmospheric boundary layer. Part I: Conditional sampling statistics. J. dim. Appl. Met. 26, 813–822.Google Scholar
Grötzbach, G.: 1982 Direct numerical simulation of laminar and turbulent Bénard convection. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 27–53.Google Scholar
Grötzbach, G.: 1986 Direct numerical and large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows. In Encyclopedia of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 6 (ed. N. P. Cheremisinoff), pp. 1337–1391. Houston: Golf.
Grötzbach, G. & Schumann, U. 1979 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent velocity, pressure and temperature fields in channel flows. In Turbulent Shear Flows, vol. I (ed. F. Durst et al.), pp. 370–385. Springer.
Guillemet, B., Jouvenaux, S., Mascart, P. & Isaka, H., 1978 Normalisation des moments du deuxième ordre de la vitesse verticale de l'air et de la température dans la couche limite convective. J. Rech. Atmos. 12, 229–243.Google Scholar
Guillemet, B., Isaka, H. & Mascart, P., 1983 Molecular dissipation of turbulent fluctuations in the convective mixed layer. Part I: Height variations of dissipation rates. Boundary-Layer Met. 27, 141–162.Google Scholar
Hess, G. D., Spillane, K. T. & Lourensz, R. S., 1988 Atmospheric vortices in shallow convection. J. Appl. Met. 27, 305–317.Google Scholar
Hinze, J. O.: 1959 Turbulence. McGraw-Hill. 586 pp.
Hunt, J. C. R.: 1984 Turbulence structure in convection and shear-free boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 138, 161–184.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R., Kaimal, J. C. & Gaynor, J. E., 1988 Eddy structure in the convective boundary layer - new measurements and new concepts. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 114, 827–858.Google Scholar
Kaimal, J. C., Wyngaard, J. C., Haugen, D. A., Coté, O. R., Izumi, Y., Caughey, S. J. & Readings, C. J., 1976 Turbulence structure in the convective boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 2152–2169.Google Scholar
Klemp, J. B. & Durran, D. R., 1983 An upper boundary condition permitting internal gravity wave radiation in numerical mesoscale models. Mon. Wea. Rev. 111, 430–444.Google Scholar
Konrad, T. G.: 1970 The dynamics of the convective process in clear air as seen by Radar. J. Atmos. Sci. 27, 1138–1147.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, R.: 1975 On cellular cloud patterns. Part 1: Mathematical model. J. Atmos. Sci. 32, 1353–1363.Google Scholar
Lenschow, D. H. & Stankov, B. B., 1986 Length scales in the convective boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 43, 1198–1209.Google Scholar
Lenschow, D. H. & Stephens, P. L., 1980 The role of thermals in the convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Met. 19, 509–532.Google Scholar
Lenschow, D. H., Wyngaard, J. C. & Pennell, W. T., 1980 Mean-field and second-moment budgets in a baroclinic, convective boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 1313–1326.Google Scholar
Lilly, D. K.: 1967 The representation of small-scale turbulence in numerical simulation experiments. In Proc. IBM Sci. Comput. Symp. on Environmental Sci., Nov. 14–16, 1966, Thomas J. Watson Res. Center, Yorktown Heights, N. Y., IBM Form 320–1951, pp. 195–210.
Ludlam, F. H. & Scorer, R. S., 1953 Convection in the atmosphere. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 79, 317–341.Google Scholar
Lyons, W. A. & Pease, S. R., 1972 “Steam Devils’ over the Lake Michigan during a January arctic outbreak. Mon. Wea. Rev. 100, 235–237.Google Scholar
Mahrt, L. & Paumier, J., 1984 Heat transport in the atmospheric boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 3061–3075.Google Scholar
Mason, P. J.: 1987 Large eddy simulation of a convective atmospheric boundary layer. In Proc. Sixth Symp. Turbulent Shear Flows, September 7–9, 1987, Toulouse, France, pp. 12-4-1–12-4-4. Extended version to appear in J. Atmos. SciGoogle Scholar
Mason, P. J. & Callen, N. S., 1986 On the magnitude of the subgrid-scale eddy coefficient in large-eddy simulations of turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 162, 439–462.Google Scholar
Mason, P. J. & Thomson, D. J., 1987 Large-eddy simulations of the neutral-static-stability planetary boundary layer. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 113, 413–443.Google Scholar
Mellor, G. L. & Yamada, T., 1974 A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci. 31, 1791–1806 (Corrigenda 1977, J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1482).Google Scholar
Moeng, C.-H.: 1984 A large-eddy-simulation model for the study of planetary boundary layer turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 2052–2062.Google Scholar
Moeng, C.-H. & Wyngaard, J. C. 1986 An analysis of closures for pressure-scalar covariances in the convective boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 43, 2499–2513.Google Scholar
Moeng, C.-H. & Wyngaard, J. C. 1988 Recent large-eddy-simulation results for the convective boundary layer. In Eight Symp. on Turbulence and Diffusion, San Diego, April 25–29, 1988, pp. 41–44. American Meteorological Society, Boston, Mass. Extended version submitted to J. Atmos. Sci.
Nieuwstadt, F. T. M. & de Valk, J. P. J. M. M. 1987 A large eddy simulation of buoyant and non-buoyant plume dispersion in the atmospheric boundary layer. Atmos. Environ. 21, 2573–2587.Google Scholar
Paulson, C. A.: 1970 The mathematical representation of wind speed and temperature profiles in the unstable atmospheric surface layer. J. Appl. Met. 9, 857–861.Google Scholar
Rowland, J. R. & Arnold, A., 1975 Vertical velocity structure and geometry of clear air convective elements. In Proc. 16th Radar Meteorology Conf., Houston, Texas, April 22–24, 1975, pp. 296–303. Amer. Met. Soc., Boston, Mass.
Schemm, C. E. & Lipps, F. B., 1976 Some results of a simplified three-dimensional numerical model of atmospheric turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 1021–1041.Google Scholar
Schmidt, H.: 1988 Grobstruktur-Simulation konvektiver Grenzschichten. Diss. University of München, report DFVLR-FB-88–30.
Schumann, U.: 1975 Subgrid scale model for finite difference simulations of turbulent flows in plane channels and annuli. J. Comp. Phys. 18, 376–404.Google Scholar
Schumann, U.: 1987 The countergradient heat flux in turbulent stratified flows. Nucl. Engrg Des., 100, 255–262.Google Scholar
Schumann, U.: 1988 Minimum friction velocity and heat transfer in the rough surface layer of a convective boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Met. 44, 311–326.Google Scholar
Schumann, U., Hauf, T., Höller, H., Schmidt, H. & Volkert, H., 1987 A mesoscale model for the simulation of turbulence, clouds and flow over mountains: Formulation and validation examples. Beitr. Phys. Atmos. 60, 413–446.Google Scholar
Smolarkiewicz, P. K.: 1984 A fully multidimensional positive definite advection transport algorithm with small implicit diffusion. J. Comput. Phys. 54, 325–362.Google Scholar
Sommeria, G.: 1976 Three-dimensional simulation of turbulent processes in an undisturbed trade wind boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 216–241.Google Scholar
Spalart, P. R: 1988 Direct simulation of a turbulent boundary layer up to R0 = 1410. J. Fluid Mech. 187, 61–98.Google Scholar
Stull, R. D.: 1973 Inversion rise model based on penetrative convection. J. Atmos. Sci. 30, 1092–1099.Google Scholar
Turner, J. S.: 1986 Turbulent entrainment: the development of the entrainment assumption and its application to geophysical flows. J. Fluid Mech. 173, 431–471.Google Scholar
Webb, E. K.: 1977 Convection mechanisms of atmospheric heat transfer from surface to global scales. In Proc. Second Australasian Conf. on Heat and Mass Transfer, Sydney, pp. 523–539. (NTIS 77N30685/2).Google Scholar
Webb, E. K.: 1984 Temperature and humidity structure in the lower atmosphere. In Geodetic Refraction-Effects of Electromagnetic Wave Propagation Through the Atmosphere (ed. F. K. Brunner), pp. 85–141. Springer.
Wilczak, J. M. & Businger, J. A., 1983 Thermally indirect motions in the convective atmospheric boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 40, 343–358.Google Scholar
Wilczak, J. M. & Businger, J. A., 1984 Large-scale eddies in the unstably stratified atmospheric surface layer. Part II: Turbulent pressure fluctuations and the budgets of heat flux, stress and turbulent kinetic energy. J. Atmos. Sci. 41, 3551–3567.Google Scholar
Wilczak, J. M. & Tillman, J. E., 1980 The three-dimensional structure of convection in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 2424–2443.Google Scholar
Willis, G. E. & Deardorff, J. W., 1974 A laboratory model of the unstable planetary boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 31, 1297–1307.Google Scholar
Willis, G. E. & Deardorff, J. W., 1979 Laboratory observations of turbulent penetrative-convection planforms. J. Geophys. Res. 84, C1, 295–301.Google Scholar
Woodcock, A. H. & Wyman, J., 1947 Convective motion in air over the sea. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 48, 749–777.Google Scholar
Wyngaard, J. C.: 1985 Structure of the planetary boundary layer and implications for its modeling. J. Clim. Appl. Met. 24, 1131–1142.Google Scholar
Young, G. S.: 1988 Turbulence structure of the convective boundary layer. Part II: Phoenix 78 aircraft observations of thermals and their environment. J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 727–735.Google Scholar
Zeman, O. & Lumley, J. L., 1976 Modeling buoyancy driven mixed layers. J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 1974–1988.Google Scholar