Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:37:04.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biofluiddynamics of balistiform and gymnotiform locomotion. Part 1. Biological background, and analysis by elongated-body theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

James Lighthill
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College, Gower Street. London. WC1E 6BT, UK
Robert Blake
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1W5, Canada

Abstract

Elongated-body theory has been fruitfully applied over twenty years to the biofluiddynamic analysis of modes of locomotion of elongated fishes by means of body flexure, with special emphasis on the anguilliform mode using undulatory body movements, and on the carangiform mode where oscillatory movements of only a fish's posterior end(including the caudal fin) exhibit phase lag of posterior movements behind anterior movements just as in an undulation yet not nearly as much as a whole wavelength is apparent at any one time. The extension of elongated-body theory to analyse the locomotion of elongated fishes with elongated median fins (dorsal and/or anal) in modes where the body (together with any caudal fin) remains rigid, being propelled forwards by undulations or oscillations of those median fins, has long been recognized as desirable but is here presented for the first time.

In many large groups of fishes, evolutionary adaptation to limited environments (such as coral reefs) favoured a development of defensive ‘armour’ at the expense of speed, to such an extent that bodies became essentially inflexible, with locomotion achieved by fin movements alone. In one principal group of such fishes, however (the sub-order Balistoidei including the trigger-fishes), a later evolutionary development restored a capacity for relatively high-speed movement even though the body remained essentially rigid. The balistiform mode of locomotion, with propulsion achieved by synchronized movements of the dorsal and anal fins, exists in two alternative forms, with either undulatory or oscillatory movements of these median fins, that are analogous to the anguilliform and carangiform modes of body flexure, respectively.

Analysis in this paper throws light on the puzzling question of why trigger-fishes are able to move so fast notwithstanding the modest extent of their fin movements. A form of the large-amplitude elongated-body theory, specially adapted to balistiform locomotion, allows a direct comparison of thrust and efficiency for different modes of propulsion. The conclusions in brief are that thrust is dominated by the mean rate of shedding of backward momentum at the posterior end of the fish's propulsive apparatus and that, for movements of median fins attached to a deep, essentially rigid body, this momentum is increased (above the momentum expected for the same movements of the fins ‘on their own’) by a momentum enhancement factor β of around 3 or a little more. Yet there is no such enhancement of the rate of shedding of ‘unproductive’ energy into the wake; accordingly, overall efficiency is improved. Also, especially for the undulatory mode of balistiform locomotion, sideforces are minimized so that the fish body avoids sideslip and yaw; accordingly, the body drag which fm thrust must overcome is reduced by another large factor.

Alongside discussion of the Balistoidei, this paper reviews and analyses balistiform locomotion as observed in several other groups, including groups of flexible-bodied fishes that regularly use this mode as a low-energy-cost alternative to locomotion by means of body flexure. Finally, we similarly analyse gymnotiform locomotion, in which the body is again held rigid, being propelled by undulations in just a single (ventral) fin, and compare and contrast different interpretations of its advantages.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1990 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K.: 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Blake, R. W.: 1981 Mechanics of ostraciiform locomotion. Can. J. Zool. 59, 10671071.Google Scholar
Blake, R. W.: 1983a Fish Locomotion. Cambridge University Press.
Blake, R. W.: 1983b Swimming in the electric eels and knifefishes. Can. J. Zool. 61, 14321441.Google Scholar
Blake, R. W.: 1983c Median and paired fin propulsion. In Fish Biomechanics (ed. P. W. Webb & D. Weihs). Praeger.
Gray, J.: 1968 Animal Locomotion. Weidenfield & Nicolson.
Lighthill, J.: 1975 Mathematical Biofluiddynamics. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (referred to as MB).
Lighthill, J.: 1986 An Informal Introduction to Theoretical Fluid Mechanics. Oxford University Press.
Lighthill, J.: 1990a Biofluiddynamics of balistiform and gymnotiform locomotion. Part 2. The pressure distribution arising in two-dimensional irrotational flow from a general symmetrical motion of a flat plate normal to itself. J. Fluid Mech. 213, 110.Google Scholar
Lighthill, J.: 1990b Biofluiddynamics of balistiform and gymnotiform locomotion. Part 3. Momentum enhancement in the presence of a body of elliptic cross-section. J. Fluid Mech. 213, 1120.Google Scholar
Lighthill, J.: 1990c Biofluiddynamics of balistiform and gymnotiform locomotion. Part 4. Short-wavelength limitations on momentum enhancement. J. Fluid Mech. 213, 2128.Google Scholar
Lissmann, H. W.: 1958 On the function and evolution of electric organs in fish. J. Exp. Biol. 35, 156191.Google Scholar
Marshall, N. B.: 1965 The Life of Fishes. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Marshall, T. C.: 1964 Fishes of the Great Barrier Reef. Angus & Robertson.
Webb, P. W. & Weihs, D. (eds.) 1983 Fish Biomechanics. Praeger.