Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:26:07.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Balance model for equatorial long waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2013

Ian H. Chan*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A7
Theodore G. Shepherd
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A7 Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6BB, UK
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Geophysical fluid models often support both fast and slow motions. As the dynamics are often dominated by the slow motions, it is desirable to filter out the fast motions by constructing balance models. An example is the quasi-geostrophic (QG) model, which is used widely in meteorology and oceanography for theoretical studies, in addition to practical applications such as model initialization and data assimilation. Although the QG model works quite well in the mid-latitudes, its usefulness diminishes as one approaches the equator. Thus far, attempts to derive similar balance models for the tropics have not been entirely successful as the models generally filter out Kelvin waves, which contribute significantly to tropical low-frequency variability. There is much theoretical interest in the dynamics of planetary-scale Kelvin waves, especially for atmospheric and oceanic data assimilation where observations are generally only of the mass field and thus do not constrain the wind field without some kind of diagnostic balance relation. As a result, estimates of Kelvin wave amplitudes can be poor. Our goal is to find a balance model that includes Kelvin waves for planetary-scale motions. Using asymptotic methods, we derive a balance model for the weakly nonlinear equatorial shallow-water equations. Specifically we adopt the ‘slaving’ method proposed by Warn et al. (Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., vol. 121, 1995, pp. 723–739), which avoids secular terms in the expansion and thus can in principle be carried out to any order. Different from previous approaches, our expansion is based on a long-wave scaling and the slow dynamics is described using the height field instead of potential vorticity. The leading-order model is equivalent to the truncated long-wave model considered previously (e.g. Heckley & Gill, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., vol. 110, 1984, pp. 203–217), which retains Kelvin waves in addition to equatorial Rossby waves. Our method allows for the derivation of higher-order models which significantly improve the representation of Rossby waves in the isotropic limit. In addition, the ‘slaving’ method is applicable even when the weakly nonlinear assumption is relaxed, and the resulting nonlinear model encompasses the weakly nonlinear model. We also demonstrate that the method can be applied to more realistic stratified models, such as the Boussinesq model.

Type
Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence . The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press.

References

Andrews, D. G., Holton, J. R. & Leovy, C. B. 1987 Middle Atmosphere Dynamics. Academic.Google Scholar
Bell, M. J., Martin, M. J. & Nichols, N. K. 2004 Assimilation of data into an ocean model with systematic errors near the equator. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 130, 873893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolin, B. 1955 Numerical forecasting with the barotropic model. Tellus 7, 2749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgers, G., Balmaseda, M. A., Vossepoel, F. C., van Oldenborgh, G. J. & van Leeuwen, P. J. 2002 Balanced ocean-data assimilation near the equator. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 32, 25092519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, J. G. 1955 The use of the primitive equations of motion in numerical prediction. Tellus 7, 2226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charney, J. G. 1963 A note on large-scale motions in the tropics. J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 607608.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daley, R. 1993 Atmospheric Data Analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Derber, J. & Bouttier, F. 1999 A reformulation of the background error covariance in the ECMWF global data assimilation system. Tellus A 51 (2), 195221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, L. C. 2010 Partial Differential Equations. American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
Fisher, M. 2003 Background error covariance modelling. In Proceedings of ECMWF Seminar on Recent Development in Data Assimilation for Atmosphere and Ocean, pp. 4563.Google Scholar
Fujiwara, M., Iwasaki, S., Shimizu, A., Shiotani, M., Matsuura, H., Inai, Y., Hasebe, F., Matsui, I., Sugimoto, N., Okamoto, H., Yoneyama, K., Hamada, A., Nishi, N. & Immler, F. 2009 Cirrus observations in the tropical tropopause layer over the Western Pacific. J. Geophys. Res. 114, D09304.Google Scholar
Gent, P. R. & McWilliams, J. C. 1983 The equatorial waves of balanced models. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 13, 11791192.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, A. E. 1980 Some simple solutions for heat-induced tropical circulation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 106, 447462.Google Scholar
Gill, A. E. 1982 Atmosphere–Ocean Dynamics. Academic.Google Scholar
Heckley, W. A. & Gill, A. E. 1984 Some simple analytical solutions to the problem of forced equatorial long waves. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 110, 203217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kistler, R., Kalnay, E., Collins, W., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Kanamitsu, M. & Kousky, V. et al. 2001 The NCEP-NCAR 50-year reanalysis: Monthly means CD-ROM and documentation. Bull. Am. Meteorol Soc. 82, 247268.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitan, B. M. 1988 Sturm–Liouville operators on the whole line, with the same discrete spectrum. Math. USSR Sb. 60, 77106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majda, A. J. 2003 Introduction to PDEs and Waves for the Atmosphere and Ocean. American Mathematical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majda, A. J. & Klein, R. 2003 Systematic multiscale models for the tropics. J. Atmos. Sci. 60, 393408.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuno, T. 1966 Quasi-geostrophic motions in the equatorial area. J. Met. Soc. Japan 44, 2543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moura, A. D. 1976 Eigensolutions of linearized balance equations over a sphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 877907.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrish, D. F. & Derber, J. C. 1992 The national-meteorological-centres spectral statistical-interpolation analysis system. Mon. Weath. Rev. 120, 17471763.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, D. J. 1994 Nonlinear balance on an equatorial beta-plane. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 120, 215219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripa, P. 1983 General stability conditions for zonal flows in a one-layer model on the beta-plane or the sphere. J. Fluid Mech. 126, 463489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roundy, P. E. & Frank, W. M. 2004 A climatology of waves in the equatorial region. J. Atmos. Sci. 61, 21052132.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saujani, S. 2005 Towards a unified theory of balanced dynamics. PhD thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Schubert, W. H., Silvers, L. G., Masarik, M. T. & Gonzalez, A. O. 2009 A filtered model of tropical wave motions. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 1, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPARC International Project Office, 2010 SPARC Chemistry-Climate Model Validation. (ed. V. Eyring, T. G. Shepherd & D. W. Waugh), SPARC Report No. 5 (WCRP No. 132, WMO/TD No. 1526), http://www.sparc-climate.org/publications/sparc-reports/sparc-report-no5/.Google Scholar
Stevens, D. E., Kuo, H.-C., Schubert, W. H & Ciesielski, P. E. 1990 Quasi-balanced dynamics in the tropics. J. Atmos. Sci. 47, 22622273.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temperton, C. & Williamson, D. L. 1981 Normal mode initialization for a multilevel grid-point model. Part I: linear aspects. Mon. Weath. Rev. 109, 729743.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theiss, J. & Mohebalhojeh, A. R. 2009 The equatorial counterpart of the quasi-geostrophic model. J. Fluid Mech. 637, 327356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titchmarsh, E. C. 1962 Eigenfunction Expansions Associated with Second-order Differential Equations. Part I. Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallis, G. K. 2006 Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verkley, W. T. M. & van der Velde, I. R. 2010 Balanced dynamics in the tropics. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 136, 4149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warn, T., Bokhove, O., Shepherd, T. G. & Vallis, G. K. 1995 Rossby number expansions, slaving principles, and balance dynamics. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 121, 723739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weideman, J. A. & Reddy, S. C. 2000 A Matlab differentiation matrix suite. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 26, 465519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, M. & Kiladis, G. N. 1999 Convectively coupled equatorial waves: analysis of clouds and temperature in the wavenumber-frequency domain. J. Atmos. Sci. 56, 374399.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, D. L. & Temperton, C. 1981 Normal mode initialization for a multilevel grid-point model. Part II: nonlinear aspects. Mon. Weath. Rev. 109, 744757.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar