Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T15:25:16.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An improved slender-body theory for Stokes flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2006

Robert E. Johnson
Robert E. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study examines the flow past slender bodies possessing finite centre-line curvature in a viscous, incompressible fluid without any appreciable inertia effects. We consider slender bodies having arbitrary centre-line configurations, circular transverse cross-sections, and longitudinal cross-sections which are approximately elliptic close to the body ends (i.e. prolate-spheroidal body ends). The no-slip boundary condition on the body surface is satisfied, using a convenient stepwise procedure, to higher orders in the slenderness parameter (ε) than has previously been possible. In fact, the boundary condition is satisfied up to an error term of O(ε2) by distributing appropriate stokeslets, potential doublets, rotlets, sources, stresslets and quadrupoles on the body centre-line. The methods used here produce an integral equation valid along the entire body length, including the ends, whose solution determines the stokeslet strength or equivalently the force per unit length up to a term of O(ε2). The O(ε2) correction to the stokeslet strength is also found. The theory is used to examine the motion of a partial torus and a helix of finite length. For helical bodies comparisons are made between the present theory and the resistive-force theory using the force coefficients of Gray & Hancock and Lighthill. For the motion considered the Gray & Hancock force coefficients generally underestimate the force per unit length, whereas Lighthill's coefficients provide good agreement except in the vicinity of the body ends.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 99 , Issue 2 , 25 July 1980 , pp. 411 - 431
Copyright
© 1980 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. 1970 Slender-body theory for particles of arbitrary cross-section in Stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 419–440.Google Scholar
Chwang, A. T., Winet, H. & Wu, T. Y. 1974 A theoretical mechanism of Spirochete locomotion. J. Mechanochem. Cell Motility 3, 69–76.Google Scholar
Chwang, A. T. & Wu, T. Y. 1971 A note on the helical movement of micro-organisms. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 178, 327–346.Google Scholar
Chwang, A. T. & Wu, T. Y. 1974 Hydromechanics of low-Reynolds-number flow, Part 1. Rotation of axisymmetric prolate bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 607–622.Google Scholar
Chwang, A. T. & Wu, T. Y. 1975 Hydromechanics of low-Reynolds-number flow, Part 2. The singularity method for Stokes flows. J. Fluid Mech. 67, 787–815.Google Scholar
Cole, J. D. 1968 Perturbation Methods in Applied Mathematics. Waltham, Massachusetts: Blaisdell.
Cox, R. G. 1970 The motion of long slender bodies in a viscous fluid, Part 1. General theory. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 791–810.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, L. E. 1969 On the method of matched asymptotic expansions, Part 2. Some applications of the composite series. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 65, 233–261.Google Scholar
Handelsman, R. A. & Keller, J. B. 1967 Axially symmetric potential flow around a slender body. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 131–147.Google Scholar
Higdon, J. J. L. 1979 The hydrodynamics of flagellar propulsion: helical waves. J. Fluid Mech. 94, 331–351.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. E. 1977 Slender-body theory for Stokes flow and flagellar hydrodynamics. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology.
Johnson, R. E. & Brokaw, C. J. 1979 Flagellar hydrodynamics. A comparison between resistive-force theory and slender-body theory. Biophys. J. 25, 113–127.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. E. & Wu, T. Y. 1979 Hydrodynamics of low-Reynolds-number flow, Part 5. Motion of a slender torus. J. Fluid Mech. 95, 263–278.Google Scholar
Keller, J. B. & Rubinow, S. I. 1976 Slender-body theory for slow viscous flow. J. Fluid Mech. 75, 705–714.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1976 Flagellar hydrodynamics. The John von Neumann Lecture, SIAM Rev. 18, 161–230.Google Scholar
Tillett, J. P. K. 1970 Axial and transverse Stokes flow past slender axisymmetric bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 401–417.Google Scholar
Tuck, E. O. 1964 Some methods for flows past blunt slender bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 18, 619–635.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, M. 1975 Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics. Stanford, California: Parabolic Press.