Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:47:50.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An extension to the universal time scale for vortex ring formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2021

Raphaël Limbourg Open the ORCID record for Raphaël Limbourg [Opens in a new window]  and
Jovan Nedić Open the ORCID record for Jovan Nedić [Opens in a new window]
Raphaël Limbourg
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, QCH3A 0C3, Canada
Jovan Nedić*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, QCH3A 0C3, Canada
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The formation of vortex rings emanating from orifices with different orifice-to-tube diameter ratios $D_0/D_p$ is studied using time-resolved particle image velocimetry. The invariants of the motion in their non-dimensional form are computed and presented in the non-dimensional time space $t^*=U_0 t/D_0$, where the subscript 0 refers to the exhaust quantities. The classic slug-flow model is revisited and extended to account for the contraction of the flow when fluid is being pushed out through the orifice. Accordingly, a new time scale in terms of the contracted quantities (subscript $\star$) is defined as $T^*=U_\star t/D_\star$. Results show that the modified slug-flow model unifies the formation number of orifices and straight nozzles with a value of approximately 4.

JFM classification

Vortex Flows: Vortex dynamics Wakes/Jets: Jets
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 915 , 25 May 2021 , A46
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, J.J. & Naitoh, T. 2005 Experimental study of the production of vortex rings using a variable diameter orifice. Phys. Fluids 17 (6), 061701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabiri, J.O. 2009 Optimal vortex formation as a unifying principle in biological propulsion. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 41, 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabiri, J.O., Colin, S.P. & Costello, J.H. 2006 Fast-swimming hydromedusae exploit velar kinematics to form an optimal vortex wake. J. Expl Biol. 209 (11), 2025–2033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dabiri, J.O. & Gharib, M. 2004 Delay of vortex ring pinchoff by an imposed bulk counterflow. Phys. Fluids 16 (4), L28–L30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabiri, J.O. & Gharib, M. 2005 a Starting flow through nozzles with temporally variable exit diameter. J. Fluid Mech. 538, 111–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabiri, J.O. & Gharib, M. 2005 b The role of optimal vortex formation in biological fluid transport. Proc. R. Soc. B 272 (1572), 1557–1560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, L., Guo, H.-F. & Yu, S.C.M. 2020 A general definition of formation time for starting jets and forced plumes at low Richardson number. J. Fluid Mech. 886, A6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, L. & Yu, S.C.M. 2010 A model for the pinch-off process of the leading vortex ring in a starting jet. J. Fluid Mech. 656, 205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, L., Yu, S.C.M., Ai, J.J. & Law, A.W.K. 2008 Circulation and energy of the leading vortex ring in a gravity-driven starting jet. Phys. Fluids 20 (9), 093604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gharib, M., Rambod, E., Kheradvar, A., Sahn, D.J. & Dabiri, J.O. 2006 Optimal vortex formation as an index of cardiac health. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103 (16), 6305–6308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gharib, M., Rambod, E. & Shariff, K. 1998 A universal time scale for vortex ring formation. J. Fluid Mech. 360, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glezer, A. & Amitay, M. 2002 Synthetic jets. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, 503–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchhoff, G. 1869 Zur theorie freier Flüssigkeitsstrahlen. J. Reine Angew. Math. 70, 289–298.Google Scholar
Krieg, M. & Mohseni, K. 2008 Thrust characterization of a bioinspired vortex ring thruster for locomotion of underwater robots. IEEE J. Ocean. Engng 33 (2), 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieg, M. & Mohseni, K. 2010 Dynamic modeling and control of biologically inspired vortex ring thrusters for underwater robot locomotion. IEEE Trans. Robot. 26 (3), 542–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieg, M. & Mohseni, K. 2013 Modelling circulation, impulse and kinetic energy of starting jets with non-zero radial velocity. J. Fluid Mech. 719, 488–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, P.S. 2005 An over-pressure correction to the slug model for vortex ring circulation. J. Fluid Mech. 545, 427–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, P.S., Dabiri, J.O. & Gharib, M. 2006 The formation number of vortex rings formed in uniform background co-flow. J. Fluid Mech. 556, 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, P.S. & Gharib, M. 2003 The significance of vortex ring formation to the impulse and thrust of a starting jet. Phys. Fluids 15 (5), 1271–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limbourg, R. & Nedić, J. 2021 Formation of an orifice-generated vortex ring. J. Fluid Mech. 913, A29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, P.F. & Turner, J.S. 2001 The formation of ‘optimal’ vortex rings, and the efficiency of propulsion devices. J. Fluid Mech. 427, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, P.F. & Turner, J.S. 2004 ‘Optimal’ vortex rings and aquatic propulsion mechanisms. Proc. R. Soc. B 271 (1539), 647–653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohseni, K. 2006 Pulsatile vortex generators for low-speed maneuvering of small underwater vehicles. Ocean. Engng 33 (16), 2209–2223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohseni, K. & Gharib, M. 1998 A model for universal time scale of vortex ring formation. Phys. Fluids 10 (10), 2436–2438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renard, P.-H., Thévenin, D., Rolon, J.C. & Candel, S. 2000 Dynamics of flame/vortex interactions. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 26 (3), 225–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, M., Katija, K. & Dabiri, J.O. 2009 Circulation generation and vortex ring formation by conic nozzles. Trans. ASME: J. Fluids Engng 131 (9), 091204.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, M., Rambod, E. & Gharib, M. 1998 Circulation and formation number of laminar vortex rings. J. Fluid Mech. 376, 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, H. & Abul-Fetouh, A.-H. 1950 Characteristics of irrotational flow through axially symmetric orifices. J. Appl. Mech. 17 (4), 421–426.Google Scholar
Shusser, M., Gharib, M. & Mohseni, K. 1999 A new model for inviscid vortex ring formation. In 30th Fluid Dynamics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinfurth, B. & Weiss, J. 2020 Vortex rings produced by non-parallel planar starting jets. J. Fluid Mech. 903, A16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trefftz, E. 1916 Über die kontraktion kreisföormiger flüssigkeitsstrahlen. Z. Math. Phys. 64, 34–61.Google Scholar
Von Mises, R. 1917 Berechnung von ausflußund überfallzahlen. Zeits. VDI 61 (21), 447–452, 469–474, 493–498.Google Scholar
Yu, S.C.M., Law, A.W.K. & Ai, J.J. 2007 Vortex formation process in gravity-driven starting jets. Exp. Fluids 42 (5), 783–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar