Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:13:04.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An analytical and experimental investigation of aerofoil–turbulence interaction noise for plates with spanwise-varying leading edges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2019

Lorna J. Ayton Open the ORCID record for Lorna J. Ayton [Opens in a new window]  and
Paruchuri Chaitanya Open the ORCID record for Paruchuri Chaitanya [Opens in a new window]
Lorna J. Ayton*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
Paruchuri Chaitanya
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Burgess Road, Southampton SO16 7QF, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents an analytic solution for gust–aerofoil interaction noise for flat plates with spanwise-varying periodic leading edges in uniform mean flow. The solution is obtained by solving the linear inviscid equations via separation of variables and the Wiener–Hopf technique, and is suitable for calculating the far-field noise generated by any leading edge with a single-valued piecewise linear periodic spanwise geometry. Acoustic results for homogeneous isotropic turbulent flow are calculated by integrating the single-gust solution over a wavenumber spectrum. The far-sound pressure level is calculated for five test-case geometries; sawtooth serration, slitted $v$-root, slitted $u$-root, chopped peak and square wave, and compared to experimental measurements. Good agreement is seen over a range of frequencies and tip-to-root ratios (varying the sharpness of the serration). The analytic solution is then used to calculate the propagating pressure along the leading edge of the serration for fixed spanwise wavenumbers, i.e. only the contribution to the surface pressure which propagates to the far field. Using these results, two primary mechanisms for noise reduction are discussed; tip and root interference, and a redistribution of energy from cuton modes to cutoff modes. A secondary noise-reduction mechanism due to nonlinear features is also discussed and seen to be particularly important for leading edges with very narrow slits.

JFM classification

Acoustics: Aeroacoustics
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 865 , 25 April 2019 , pp. 137 - 168
Copyright
© 2019 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amiet, R. K. 1976 Noise due to turbulent flow past a trailing edge. J. Sound Vib. 47, 387–393.10.1016/0022-460X(76)90948-2Google Scholar
Ayton, L. J. 2016 Acoustic scattering by a finite rigid plate with a poroelastic extension. J. Fluid Mech. 791, 414–438.Google Scholar
Ayton, L. J. 2018 Analytic solution for aerodynamic noise generated by plates with spanwise-varying trailing edges. J. Fluid Mech. 849, 448–466.10.1017/jfm.2018.431Google Scholar
Ayton, L. J. & Chaitanya, P. 2017 Analytical and experimental investigation into the effects of leading-edge radius on gust–aerofoil interaction noise. J. Fluid Mech. 829, 780–808.10.1017/jfm.2017.594Google Scholar
Ayton, L. J. & Kim, J.-W. 2018 An analytic solution for the noise generated by gust–aerofoil interaction for plates with serrated leading edges. J. Fluid Mech. 853, 515–536.10.1017/jfm.2018.583Google Scholar
Biedermann, T. M., Chong, T. P., Kameier, F. & Paschereit, C. O. 2017 Statistical empirical modeling of airfoil noise subjected to leading-edge serrations. AIAA J. 55, 3128–3142.Google Scholar
Cannard, M., Joseph, P. F., Chaitanya, P. & Kim, J. W. 2018 Numerical investigation into slitted leading-edge profiles for reducing interaction noise. In International Congress on Sound and Vibration: Hiroshima Calling, vol. 3, pp. 1366–1373. International Institute of Acoustics and Vibration.Google Scholar
Chaitanya, P. & Joseph, P. F. 2018 Slitted leading edge profiles for the reduction of turbulence–aerofoil interaction noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 143 (6), 3494–3504.10.1121/1.5040972Google Scholar
Chaitanya, P., Joseph, P. F. & Ayton, L. J.2018a On the superior performance of leading edge slits over serrations for the reduction of aerofoil interaction noise. In 24th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics. AIAA 2018-3121.Google Scholar
Chaitanya, P., Joseph, P. F., Narayanan, S. & Kim, J.-W. 2018b Aerofoil broadband noise reductions through double-wavelength leading edge serrations; a new control concept. J. Fluid Mech. 855, 131–151.Google Scholar
Chaitanya, P., Joseph, P. F., Narayanan, S., Vanderwel, C., Turner, J., Kim, J.-W. & Ganapathisubramani, B. 2017 Performance and mechanism of sinusoidal leading edge serrations for the reductions of aerofoil interaction noise. J. Fluid Mech. 818, 435–464.10.1017/jfm.2017.141Google Scholar
Chaitanya, P., Narayanan, S., Joseph, P. F. & Kim, J.-W.2016 Leading edge serration geometries for significantly enhanced leading edge noise reductions. In 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics. AIAA 2016-2736.Google Scholar
Chase, D. M. 1987 The character of the turbulent wall pressure spectrum at subconvective wavenumbers and a suggested comprehensive model. J. Sound Vib. 112, 125–147.10.1016/S0022-460X(87)80098-6Google Scholar
Chong, T. P., Joseph, P. F. & Davis, P. O. A. L. 2008 A parametric study of passive flow control for a short, high area ratio 90° curved diffuser. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng 130, 111104–111112.10.1115/1.2969447Google Scholar
Clair, V., Polacsek, C., Le Garrec, T., Reboul, G., Gruber, M. & Joseph, P. 2013 Experimental and numerical investigation of turbulence-airfoil noise reduction using wavy edges. AIAA J. 51, 2695–2713.10.2514/1.J052394Google Scholar
Clark, I. A., Daly, C. A., Devenport, W., Alexander, W. N., Peake, N., Jaworski, J. W. & Glegg, S. 2016 Bio-inspired canopies for the reduction of roughness noise. J. Sound Vib. 385, 33–54.10.1016/j.jsv.2016.08.027Google Scholar
Envia, E.1988 Influence of vane sweep on rotor–stator interaction noise. PhD thesis, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Geyer, T. F. & Sarradj, E.2014 Trailing edge noise of partially porous airfoils. In 20th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Atlanta, GA. AIAA 2014-3039.Google Scholar
Geyer, T. F., Wasala, S. H., Cater, J. E., Norris, S. E. & Sarradj, E.2016 Experimental investigation of leading edge hook structures for wind turbine noise reduction. In 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics. AIAA 2016-2954.Google Scholar
Glegg, S. & Devenport, W. 2017 Aeroacoustics of Low Mach Number Flows. Academic Press, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Graham, R. R. 1934 The silent flight of owls. J. R. Aero. Soc. 38, 837–843.Google Scholar
Hansen, K., Kelso, R. & Doolan, C. 2012 Reduction of flow induced airfoil tonal noise using leading edge sinusoidal modifications. Acoust. Australia 40, 172–177.Google Scholar
Herr, M. 2006 Experimental study on noise reduction through trailing-edge brushes. Notes Numer. Fluid Mech. 92, 365–372.Google Scholar
Hersh, A. S., Soderman, P. T. & Hayden, R. E. 1974 Investigation of acoustic effects of leading-edge serrations on airfoils. J. Aircraft 11, 197–202.10.2514/3.59219Google Scholar
Howe, M. S. 1998 Acoustics of Fluid–Structure Interactions. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511662898Google Scholar
Huang, X. 2017 Theoretical model of acoustic scattering from a flat plate with serrations. J. Fluid Mech. 819, 228–257.Google Scholar
Jaworski, J. W. & Peake, N. 2013 Aerodynamic noise from a poroelastic edge with implications for the silent flight of owls. J. Fluid Mech. 723, 456–479.10.1017/jfm.2013.139Google Scholar
Kim, J.-W., Haeri, S. & Joseph, P. F. 2016 On the reduction of aerofoil–turbulence interaction noise associated with wavy leading edges. J. Fluid Mech. 792, 526–552.Google Scholar
Lau, A. S. H., Haeri, S. & Kim, J. W. 2013 The effect of wavy leading edges on aerofoil–gust interaction noise. J. Sound Vib. 332, 6234–6253.Google Scholar
Lilley, G. M.1998 A study of the silent flight of the owl. In 4th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Toulouse. AIAA 1998-2340.Google Scholar
Lyu, B. & Azarpeyvand, M. 2017 On the noise prediction for serrated leading edges. J. Fluid Mech. 826, 205–234.Google Scholar
Lyu, B., Azarpeyvand, M. & Sinayoko, S. 2016 Prediction of noise from serrated trailing edges. J. Fluid Mech. 793, 556–588.10.1017/jfm.2016.132Google Scholar
Mathews, J. & Peake, N.2015 Noise generation by turbulence interacting with an aerofoil with a serrated leading edge. In 21st AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Dallas, TX. AIAA 2015-2204.Google Scholar
Mish, P. & Devenport, W. 2006a An experimental investigation of unsteady surface pressure on an airfoil in turbulence. Part 1: effects of mean loading. J. Sound Vib. 296, 417–446.10.1016/j.jsv.2005.08.008Google Scholar
Mish, P. & Devenport, W. 2006b An experimental investigation of unsteady surface pressure on an airfoil in turbulence. Part 2: sources and prediction of mean loading effects. J. Sound Vib. 296, 447–460.10.1016/j.jsv.2005.08.009Google Scholar
Moreau, S. & Roger, M. 2009 Back-scattering correction and further extensions of Amiet’s trailing-edge noise model. Part II: application. J. Sound Vib. 323, 397–425.10.1016/j.jsv.2008.11.051Google Scholar
Narayanan, S., Chaitanya, P., Haeri, S., Joseph, P., Kim, J. W. & Polacsek, C. 2015 Airfoil noise reductions through leading edge serrations. Phys. Fluids 27, 025109.10.1063/1.4907798Google Scholar
Oerlemans, S.2016 Reduction of wind turbine noise using blade trailing edge devices. In 22nd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics. AIAA 2016-3018.Google Scholar
Olsen, W. & Wagner, J. 1982 Effect of thickness on airfoil surface noise. AIAA J. 20, 437–439.10.2514/3.7922Google Scholar
Peake, N. & Parry, A. B. 2012 Modern challenges facing turbomachinery aeroacoustics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 44, 227–248.10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101231Google Scholar
Roger, M. & Carazo, A.2010 Blade-geometry considerations in analytical gust–airfoil interaction noise models. 16th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, Stockholm, Sweden. AIAA 2010-3799.Google Scholar
Roger, M. & Moreau, S. 2005 Back-scattering correction and further extensions of Amiet’s trailing-edge noise model. Part 1. Theory. J. Sound Vib. 286, 477–506.Google Scholar
Roger, M., Schram, C. & De Santana, L.2013 Reduction of airfoil turbulence-impingement noise by means of leading-edge serrations and/or porous material. In 19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics. AIAA 2013-2108.Google Scholar
Turner, J. M. & Kim, J. W. 2017 Aeroacoustic source mechanisms of a wavy leading edge undergoing vortical disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 811, 582–611.10.1017/jfm.2016.785Google Scholar