Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:28:13.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An analysis of near-marginal, mildly penetrative convection with heat flux prescribed on the boundaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

A. J. Roberts
A. J. Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW Permanent address: Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Adelaide, G.P.O. Box 498, Adelaide, South Australia 5001.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The model penetrative-convection problem of ice–water convection is considered. Analytical progress is made through the remarkable simplification that horizontally long convection cells are preferred when the heat flux is fixed on the boundaries (Chapman & Proctor 1980). However, a linear analysis shows that long horizontal scales are preferred only when the convection is mildly penetrative (i.e. the overlying layer of stable fluid is not deep). A straightforward nonlinear asymptotic analysis of the convection only provides the relatively uninteresting information that the convection is subcritical. Using the technique of reconstitution (Roberts 1985) to provide higher-order corrections to the asymptotic theory, flow properties at larger amplitudes are calculated and predictions about the extent of the subcriticality are made.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 158 , September 1985 , pp. 71 - 93
Copyright
© 1985 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrian R. J. 1975 Turbulent convection in water over ice. J. Fluid Mech. 69, 753–781.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, M. & Stegun I. 1965 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.
Chapman C. J., Childress, S. & Proctor M. R. E. 1980 Long wavelength thermal convection between non-conducting boundaries. Earth Planetary Sci. Lett. 51, 342–369.Google Scholar
Chapman, C. J. & Proctor M. R. E. 1980 Nonlinear Rayleigh—Bénard convection between poorly conducting boundaries. J. Fluid Mech. 101, 759–782.Google Scholar
Cushman-Roisin B. 1982 Penetrative convection in the upper ocean due to surface cooling. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 19, 61–91.Google Scholar
Davis S. H. 1969 On the principle of exchange of stabilities Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 310, 341–358.Google Scholar
Deardorff J. W., Willis, G. E. & Lilly D. K. 1969 Laboratory investigation of non-steady penetrative convection. J. Fluid Mech. 35, 7–31.Google Scholar
Denton, R. A. & Wood I. R. 1981 Penetrative convection at low Péclet number. J. Fluid Mech. 113, 1–21.Google Scholar
Depassier, M. C. & Spiegel E. A. 1982 Convection with heat flux prescribed on the boundaries of the system. I. The effect of temperature dependence of material properties. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 21, 167–188.Google Scholar
Farmer D. M. 1975 Penetrative convection in the absence of mean shear. Q.J.R. Met. Soc. 101, 869–891.Google Scholar
Granoff, B. & Bleistein N. 1972 Asymptotic solutions of a 6th order differential equation with two turning points. Part 1: derivation by method of steepest descent. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 3, 45–57.Google Scholar
Jones C. A. 1982 On flow between counter-rotating cylinders. Preprint, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
Manton M. J. 1975 Penetrative convection due to a field of thermals. J. Atmos. Sci. 32, 2272–2277.Google Scholar
Mollendorff J. C., Johnson, R. S. & Gebhart B. 1981 Several plume flows in pure and saline water at its density extremum. J. Fluid Mech. 113, 269–282.Google Scholar
Moore, D. R. & Weiss N. O. 1973 Nonlinear penetrative convection. J. Fluid Mech. 61, 533–581.Google Scholar
Musman S. 1968 Penetrative convection. J. Fluid Mech. 31, 343–360.Google Scholar
Myrup L., Gross D., Hoo, L. S. & Goddard W. 1970 Weather 25, 150.
Nield D. A. 1975 The onset of transient convective instability. J. Fluid Mech. 71, 441–454.Google Scholar
Proctor M. R. E. 1981 Planform selection by finite-amplitude thermal convection between poorly conducting slabs. J. Fluid Mech. 113, 469–485.Google Scholar
Roberts A. J. 1981 Fixed flux penetrative convection. Woods Hole Oceanogr. Inst. Rep. WHOI-81-102.Google Scholar
Roberts A. J. 1982 Nonlinear buoyancy effects in fluids. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
Roberts A. J. 1985 An introduction to the technique of reconstitution. SIAM J. Math. Anal. (to appear).Google Scholar
Spiegel E. A. 1981 Physics of convection. Woods Hole Oceanogr. Inst. Rep. WHOI-81-102.Google Scholar
Tankin, R. S. & Farhadieh R. 1971 Effect of thermal convection currents on formation of ice. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 14, 953–961.Google Scholar
Taylor G. I. 1953 Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 219, 186–203.Google Scholar
Townsend A. A. 1964 Natural convection in water over an ice surface. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 90, 248–259.Google Scholar
Turner J. S. 1973 Buoyancy Effects in Fluids. Cambridge University Press.
Veronis G. 1963 Penetrative convection. Astrophys. J. 137, 641.Google Scholar
Walden, R. W. & Ahlers G. 1981 Non-Boussinesq and penetrative convection in a cylindrical cell. J. Fluid Mech. 109, 89–114.Google Scholar
Warner, J. & Telford J. W. 1967 Convection below cloud base. J. Atmos. Sci. 24, 374–382.Google Scholar
Whitehead, J. A. & Chen M. M. 1970 Thermal instability and convection of a thin fluid layer bounded by a stably stratified region. J. Fluid Mech. 40, 549–576.Google Scholar
Willis, G. E. & Deardorff J. W. 1974 A laboratory model of the unstable planetry boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 31, 1297–1307.Google Scholar