Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:34:57.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Active turbulence control for drag reduction in wall-bounded flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Haecheon Choi ,
Parviz Moin  and
John Kim
Haecheon Choi
Affiliation:
Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94035, USA NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
Parviz Moin
Affiliation:
Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94035, USA
John Kim
Affiliation:
Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94035, USA Present address: Mechanical, Aerospace, and Nuclear Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objective of this study is to explore concepts for active control of turbulent boundary layers leading to skin-friction reduction using the direct numerical simulation technique. Significant drag reduction is achieved when the surface boundary condition is modified to suppress the dynamically significant coherent structures present in the wall region. The drag reduction is accompanied by significant reduction in the intensity of the wall-layer structures and reductions in the magnitude of Reynolds shear stress throughout the flow. The apparent outward shift of turbulence statistics in the controlled flows indicates a displaced virtual origin of the boundary layer and a thickened sublayer. Time sequences of the flow fields show that there are essentially two drag-reduction mechanisms. Firstly, within a short time after the control is applied, drag is reduced mainly by deterring the sweep motion without modifying the primary streamwise vortices above the wall. Consequently, the high-shear-rate regions on the wall are moved to the interior of the channel by the control schemes. Secondly, the active control changes the evolution of the wall vorticity layer by stabilizing and preventing lifting of the spanwise vorticity near the wall, which may suppress a source of new streamwise vortices above the wall.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 262 , 3 October 1994 , pp. 75 - 110
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alfredsson, P. H., Johansson, A. V. & Kim, J. 1988 Turbulence production near walls: the role of flow structures with spanwise asymmetry. In Studying Turbulence Using Numerical Simulation Databases, Proceedings of the 1988 Summer Program of the Center for Turbulence Research, NASA-Ames and Stanford University, pp. 131–141.
Bandyopadhyay, P. R. 1986 Review – mean low in turbulent boundary layers disturbed to alter skin friction. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 108, 127.Google Scholar
Bushnell, D. M. & McGinley, C. B. 1989 Turbulence control in wall flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 21, 1.Google Scholar
Cantwell, B. J. 1981 Organized motion in turbulent flow. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 13, 457.Google Scholar
Choi, H., Moin, P. & Kim, J. 1992 Turbulent drag reduction: studies of feedback control and flow over riblets. Rep. TF-55. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University.
Choi, H., Moin, P. & Kim, J. 1993 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over riblets. J. Fluid Mech. 255, 503.Google Scholar
Choi, K.-S. 1989 Near-wall structure of a turbulent boundary layer with riblets. J. Fluid Mech. 208, 417.Google Scholar
Corino, E. R. & Brodkey, R. S. 1969 A visual investigation of the wall region in turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 37, 1.Google Scholar
Guezennec, Y. G. & Nagib, H. M. 1985 Documentation of mechanisms leading to net drag reduction in manipulated turbulent boundary layers. AIAA Paper 85-0519.
Ho, C. M. & Huang, L. S. 1982 Subharmonics and vortex merging in mixing layers. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 443.Google Scholar
Hooshmand, A., Youngs, R. A., Wallace, J. M. & Balint, J.-L. 1983 An experimental study of changes in the structure of a turbulent boundary layer due to surface geometry changes AIAA Paper 83-0230.
Jiménez, J. 1987 Bifurcations and bursting in two-dimensional Poiseuille flow. Phys. Fluids 30, 3644.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J. & Moin, P. 1991 The minimal flow unit in near-wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 225, 213.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J., Moin, P., Moser, R. & Keefe, L. 1988 Ejection mechanisms in the sublayer of a turbulent channel. Phys. Fluids 31, 1311.Google Scholar
Johansson, A. V., Alfredsson, P. H. & Kim, J. 1987 Shear layer structures in near-wall turbulence. In Studying Turbulence Using Numerical Simulation Databases, Proceedings of the 1987 Summer Program of the Center for the Turbulence Research, NASA-Ames and Stanford University pp. 237–251.
Johansson, A. V., Her, A. V. & Haritonodis, J. H. 1987 On the generation of high amplitude pressure peaks in turbulent boundary layers and spots. J. Fluid Mech. 175, 119.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1989 On the structure of pressure fluctuations in simulated turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 205, 421.Google Scholar
Kim, J. & Moin, P. 1986 Flow structures responsible for the bursting process. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 31, 1716.Google Scholar
Kim, J., Moin, P. & Moser, R. 1987 Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133.Google Scholar
Kline, S. J., Reynolds, W. C., Schraub, F. A. & Runstadler, P. W. 1967 The structure of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 741.Google Scholar
Kravchenko, A. G., Choi, H. & Moin, P. 1993 On the relation of near-wall streamwise vortices to wall skin friction in turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids A 5, 3307.Google Scholar
Kuhn, G. D., Moin, P., Kim, J. & Ferziger, J. H. 1984 Turbulent flow in a channel with a wall with progressive waves. Proceedings ASME Symp. on Laminar Turbulent Boundary Layers: Control, Modification and Marine Applications, New Orleans.
Laurien, E. & Kleiser, L. 1989 Numerical simulation of boundary-layer transition and transition control. J. Fluid Mech. 199, 403.Google Scholar
Lumley, J. L. 1973 Drag reduction in turbulent flow by polymer additives. J. Polymer Sci. D: Macromol. Rev. 7, 263.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, R. W., Rutland, C. J, Duncan, J. H. & Riley, J. J. 1986 Numerical simulation of active stabilization of laminer boundary layers. AIAA J. 24, 1494.Google Scholar
Moin, P. 1987 Analysis of turbulence data generated by numerical simulations. AIAA Paper 87-0194.
Moin, P., Kim, J. & Choi, H. 1989 On the active control of wall-bounded turbulent flows. AIAA Paper 89-0960.
Narasimha, R. 1983 The turbulence problem: a survey. J. Indian Inst. Sci. 64, (A), 1.Google Scholar
Nguyen, V. D., Savill, A. M. & Westphal, R. V. 1987 Skin friction measurements following manipulation of a turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J. 25, 1429.Google Scholar
Orlandi, P. 1990 Vortex dipole rebound from a wall. Phys. Fluids A 2, 1429.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. K. 1991 Coherent motions in the turbulent boundary layer. A. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 601.Google Scholar
Wallace, J. M., Eckelmann, H. & Brodkey, R. S. 1972 The wall region in turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 54, 39.Google Scholar
Walsh, M. J. 1982 Turbulent boundary layer drag reduction using riblets. AIAA Paper 82-169.
White, F. M. 1974 Viscous Fluid Flow. McGraw-Hill.
Willmarth, W. W. & Lu, S. S. 1972 Structure of the Reynolds stress near the wall. J. Fluid Mech. 55, 65.Google Scholar