Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T13:21:34.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acoustic receptivity simulations of flow past a flat plate with elliptic leading edge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2016

Nima Shahriari ,
Daniel J. Bodony ,
Ardeshir Hanifi  and
Dan S. Henningson
Nima Shahriari*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics, Linné FLOW Centre and Swedish e-Science Research Centre (SeRC), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Daniel J. Bodony
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 61801, USA
Ardeshir Hanifi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics, Linné FLOW Centre and Swedish e-Science Research Centre (SeRC), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden Swedish Defence Research Agency, FOI, SE-164 90 Stockholm, Sweden
Dan S. Henningson
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanics, Linné FLOW Centre and Swedish e-Science Research Centre (SeRC), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present results of numerical simulations of leading-edge acoustic receptivity for acoustic waves impinging on the leading edge of a finite-thickness flat plate. We use both compressible and incompressible flow solvers fitted with high-order high-accuracy numerical methods and independent methods of estimating the receptivity coefficient. The results show that the level of acoustic receptivity in the existing literature appears to be one order of magnitude too high. Our review of previous numerical simulations and experiments clearly identifies some contradictory trends. In the limit of an infinitely thin flat plate, our results are consistent with asymptotic theory and numerical simulations.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary Layers Boundary Layers: Boundary layer receptivity Boundary Layers: Boundary layer stability
Type
Rapids
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 800 , 10 August 2016 , R2
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bodony, D. J. 2006 Analysis of sponge zones for computational fluid mechanics. J. Comput. Phys. 212 (2), 681–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodony, D. J. 2010 Accuracy of the simultaneous-approximation-term boundary condition for time-dependent problems. J. Sci. Comput. 43 (1), 118–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, P. F., Lottes, J. W. & Kerkemeier, S. G.2008 NEK5000 Web page. http://nek5000.mcs.anl.gov.Google Scholar
Fuciarelli, D., Reed, H. & Lyttle, I. 2000 Direct numerical simulation of leading-edge receptivity to sound. AIAA J. 38 (7), 1159–1165.Google Scholar
Giannetti, F. & Luchini, P. 2006 Leading-edge receptivity by adjoint methods. J. Fluid Mech. 547, 21–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. & Hultgren, L. S. 1989 Boundary-layer receptivity to long-wave free-stream disturbances. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 21 (1), 137–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerschen, E. J., Choudhari, M. & Heinrich, R. A. 1990 Generation of boundary layer instability waves by acoustic and vortical free-stream disturbances. In Laminar-Turbulent Transition, pp. 477–488. Springer.Google Scholar
Lin, N., Reed, H. & Saric, W. S. 1992 Effect of leading-edge geometry on boundary-layer receptivity to freestream sound. In Instability, Transition, and Turbulence, pp. 421–440. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monschke, J. A., Kuester, M. S. & White, E. B. 2016 Acoustic receptivity measurements using modal decomposition of a modified Orr–Sommerfeld equation. AIAA J. 54 (3), 805–815.Google Scholar
Murdock, J. W. 1980 The generation of a Tollmien–Schlichting wave by a sound wave. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 372 (1751), 517–534.Google Scholar
Saric, W. S., Wei, W. & Rasmussen, B. K. 1995 Effect of leading edge on sound receptivity. In Laminar–Turbulent Transition, pp. 413–420. Springer.Google Scholar
Saric, W. S. & White, E. B.1998 Influence of high-amplitude noise on boundary-layer transition to turbulence. AIAA Paper 98-2645.Google Scholar
Schrader, L. U., Brandt, L., Mavriplis, C. & Henningson, D. S. 2010 Receptivity to free-stream vorticity of flow past a flat plate with elliptic leading edge. J. Fluid Mech. 653, 245–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand, B. 1994 Summation by parts for finite difference approximations for d/dx . J. Comput. Phys. 110 (1), 47–67.Google Scholar
Svärd, M., Carpenter, M. H. & Nordström, J. 2007 A stable high-order finite difference scheme for the compressible Navier–Stokes equations, far-field boundary conditions. J. Comput. Phys. 225 (1), 1020–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svärd, M. & Nordström, J. 2008 A stable high-order finite difference scheme for the compressible Navier–Stokes equations: no-slip wall boundary conditions. J. Comput. Phys. 227 (10), 4805–4824.Google Scholar
Turner, M. R. 2012 Tollmien–Schlichting wave amplitudes on a semi-infinite flat plate and a parabolic body: comparison of a parabolized stability equation method and direct numerical simulations. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 65 (2), 183–210.Google Scholar
Wanderley, J. B. V.1998 Numerical simulation of receptivity to acoustic waves on elliptic leading edges. PhD thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Wanderley, J. B. V. & Corke, T. C. 2001 Boundary layer receptivity to free-stream sound on elliptic leading edges of flat plates. J. Fluid Mech. 429, 1–21.Google Scholar
Wlezien, R.1994 Measurement of acoustic receptivity. AIAA Paper 94-2221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q. & Bodony, D. J. 2012 Numerical investigation and modelling of acoustically excited flow through a circular orifice backed by a hexagonal cavity. J. Fluid Mech. 693, 367–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar