Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T11:26:09.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wall pressure and vorticity in the intermittently turbulent regime of the Stokes boundary layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2018

João H. Bettencourt Open the ORCID record for João H. Bettencourt [Opens in a new window]  and
Frédéric Dias
João H. Bettencourt*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, MaREI Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland Centre for Marine Technology and Ocean Engineering (CENTEC), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
Frédéric Dias
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, MaREI Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper we study the wall pressure and vorticity fields of the Stokes boundary layer in the intermittently turbulent regime through direct numerical simulation (DNS). The DNS results are compared to experimental measurements and a good agreement is found for the mean and fluctuating velocity fields. We observe maxima of the turbulent kinetic energy and wall shear stress in the early deceleration stage and minima in the late acceleration stage. The wall pressure field is characterized by large fluctuations with respect to the root mean square level, while the skewness and kurtosis of the wall pressure show significant deviations from their Gaussian values. The wall vorticity components show different behaviours during the cycle: for the streamwise component, positive and negative fluctuations have the same probability of occurrence throughout the cycle while the spanwise fluctuations favour negative extrema in the acceleration stage and positive extrema in the deceleration stage. The wall vorticity flux is a function of the wall pressure gradients. Vorticity creation at the wall reaches a maximum at the beginning of the deceleration stage due to the increase of uncorrelated wall pressure signals. The spanwise vorticity component is the most affected by the oscillations of the outer flow. These findings have consequences for the design of wave energy converters. In extreme seas, wave induced fluid velocities can be very high and extreme wall pressure fluctuations may occur. Moreover, the spanwise vortical fields oscillate violently in a wave cycle, inducing strong interactions between vortices and the device that can enhance the device motion.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary layer structure Turbulent Flows: Turbulent boundary layers Turbulent Flows: Turbulence simulation
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 851 , 25 September 2018 , pp. 479 - 506
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akhavan, R., Kamm, R. D. & Shapiro, A. H. 1991a An investigation of transition to turbulence in bounded oscillatory stokes flows. Part 1. Experiments. J. Fluid Mech. 225, 395–422.Google Scholar
Akhavan, R., Kamm, R. D. & Shapiro, A. H. 1991b An investigation of transition to turbulence in bounded oscillatory stokes flows. Part 2. Numerical simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 225, 423–444.Google Scholar
Andreopoulos, J. & Agui, J. H. 1996 Wall-vorticity flux dynamics in a two-dimensional turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 309, 45–84.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 2000 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bettencourt, J., Lopez, C. & Hernandez-Garcia, E. 2013 Characterization of coherent structures in three-dimensional turbulent flows using the finite-size Lyapunov exponent. J. Phys. A 46, 1–20.Google Scholar
Carstensen, S., Sumer, B. M. & Fredsøe, J. 2010 Coherent structures in wave boundary layers. Part 1. Oscillatory motion. J. Fluid Mech. 646, 169–206.Google Scholar
Costamagna, P., Vittori, G. & Blondeaux, P. 2003 Coherent structures in oscillatory boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 474, 1–33.Google Scholar
Cummins, C. P. & Dias, F. 2017 A new model of viscous dissipation for an oscillating wave surge converter. J. Engng Maths 103, 195–216.Google Scholar
Dias, F., Renzi, E., Gallagher, S., Sarkar, D., Wei, Y., Abadie, T., Cummins, C. & Rafiee, A. 2017 Analytical and computational modelling for wave energy systems: the example of oscillating wave surge converters. Acta Mechanica Sin. 33, 647–662.Google Scholar
Dubief, Y. & Delcayre, F. 2000 On coherent-vortex identification in turbulence. J. Turbul. 1, 1–22.Google Scholar
Eckmann, D. M. & Grotberg, J. B. 1991 Experiments on transition to turbulence in oscillatory pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 222, 329–350.Google Scholar
Green, M. A., Rowley, C. W. & Haller, G. 2007 Detection of Lagrangian coherent structures in three-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 572, 111–120.Google Scholar
Hino, M., Kashiwayanagi, M., Nakayama, A. & Hara, T. 1983 Experiments on the turbulence statistics and the structure of a reciprocating oscillatory flow. J. Fluid Mech. 131, 363–400.Google Scholar
Hino, M., Sawamoto, M. & Takasu, S. 1976 Experiments on transition to turbulence in an oscillatory pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 75, 193–207.Google Scholar
Honkan, A. & Andreopoulos, Y. 1997 Vorticity, strain-rate and dissipation characteristics in the near-wall region of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 350, 29–96.Google Scholar
Issa, R. I. 1986 Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting. J. Comput. Phys. 62 (1), 40–65.Google Scholar
Jensen, B. L., Sumer, B. M. & Fredsøe, J. 1989 Turbulent oscillatory boundary layers at high Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 206, 265–297.Google Scholar
Jeong, J. & Hussain, F. 1995 On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 285, 69–94.Google Scholar
Jeong, J., Hussain, F., Schoppa, W. & Kim, J. 1997 Coherent structures near the wall in a turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 332, 185–214.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1989 On the structure of pressure fluctuations in simulated turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 205, 421–451.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1963 Boundary layer theory. In Laminar Boundary Layers (ed. Rosenhead, L.). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mazzuoli, M., Vittori, G. & Blondeaux, P. 2011 Turbulent spots in oscillatory boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 685, 365–376.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. K. 1991 Coherent motions in the turbulent boundary layer. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 601–639.Google Scholar
Salon, S., Armenio, V. & Crise, A. 2007 A numerical investigation of the stokes boundary layer in the turbulent regime. J. Fluid Mech. 570, 253–296.Google Scholar
Sarpkaya, T. 1993 Coherent structures in oscillatory boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 253, 105–140.Google Scholar
Schewe, G. 1983 On the structure and resolution of wall-pressure fluctuations associated with turbulent boundary-layer flow. J. Fluid Mech. 134, 311–328.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. & Gersten, K. 2003 Boundary-layer Theory. Springer.Google Scholar
Scotti, A. & Piomelli, U. 2001 Numerical simulation of pulsating turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 13, 1367–1384.Google Scholar
Vittori, G. & Verzicco, R. 1998 Direct simulation of transition in an oscillatory boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 371, 207–232.Google Scholar
Von Kerczek, C. & Davis, S. H. 1974 Linear stability theory of oscillatory stokes layers. J. Fluid Mech. 62, 753–773.Google Scholar
Wei, Y., Rafiee, A., Henry, A. & Dias, F. 2015 Wave interaction with an oscillating wave surge converter. Part I. Viscous effects. Ocean Engng 104, 185–203.Google Scholar
Wu, J. Z. & Wu, J. M. 1996 Vorticity dynamics on boundaries. Adv. Appl. Mech. 32, 119–275.Google Scholar