Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:48:57.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A visual study of the coherent structure of the turbulent boundary layer in flow with adverse pressure gradient

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Qi Xiang Lian
Affiliation:
Institute of Fluid Mechanics, Beijing Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China

Abstract

Experimental investigations were carried out on the coherent structures of turbulent boundary layers in flow with adverse pressure gradient and, in the vicinity of separation, extensive visual observations using hydrogen bubble technique have been performed. In a flow with adverse pressure gradient the size of the structures are larger, therefore more details were observed. By a suitable manipulation of the generation of hydrogen bubble time-lines some new results were obtained in observing plan views near the wall. (1) The long streaks downstream along the interface regions between low-speed and high-speed streaks are continually stretching and their velocity may be greater than that of high-speed streaks, and the hydrogen bubbles in the long streaks generally have a longer life. (2) The x, y-vortices (streamwise) were also observed along the interface regions between high-speed and low-speed streaks. (3) The z-vortices (transverse) were observed at the front of the high-speed regions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1990 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackwelder, R. F. & Chang, S. I. 1986 AIAA Paper 86-0287.
Bushnell, D. M. 1983 AIAA Paper 83-0227.
Cantwell, C. T. 1981 Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 13, 457.
Falco, R. E. 1977 Phys. Fluids 20, 124.
Guezennec, Y. G. & Nagib, H. M. 1985 AIAA Paper 85-0519.
Head, M. R. & Bandyopadhayay, P. 1981 J. Fluid Mech. 107, 197.
Hussain, A. K. M. F. 1983 Phys. Fluids 26, 2816.
Johanson, J. B. & Smith, C. R. 1986 AIAA J. 24, 1081.
Kim, J. 1983 Phys. Fluids 26, 2088.
Kim, J. & Moin, P. 1986 J. Fluid Mech. 162, 339.
Kline, S. J. & Falco, R. E. 1980 AFOSR TR 80-0290, ADA 083717.
Kline, S. J., Reynolds, W. C., Schraub, F. A. & Rundstadler, P. W. 1967 J. Fluid Mech. 30, 741.
Lian, Q. X. 1983 Acta Mechanica Sinica 4, 414 (in Chinese).
Lian, Q. X. 1985 Acta Mechanica Sinica 1, 71 (English edition).
Moin, P. & Kim, J. 1985 J. Fluid Mech. 155, 441.
Nakagawa, H. & Nezu, I. 1981 J. Fluid Mech. 104, 1.
Perry, A. E., Henbest, S. & Chong, M. S. 1986 J. Fluid Mech. 165, 163.
Sandborn, V. A. & Kline, S. J. 1961 Trans. ASME D: J. Basic Engng 83, 317.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. L., Chew, Y. T. & Shivaprasad, B. G. 1981 J. Fluid Mech. 113, 23.
Simpson, R. L., Strikland, J. H. & Barr, P. W. 1977 J. Fluid Mech. 79, 553.
Smith, C. R. & Metzler, S. P. 1983 J. Fluid Mech. 129, 27.
Stratford, B. S. 1959 J. Fluid Mech. 5, 17.
Theodorson, T. 1952 Proc. 2nd Midwestern Conf. on Fluid Mechanics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.