Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:59:28.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Viscous coupling of shear-free turbulence across nearly flat fluid interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2011

J. C. R. HUNT ,
D. D. STRETCH  and
S. E. BELCHER
J. C. R. HUNT*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK J. M. Burgers Centre, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands
D. D. STRETCH
Affiliation:
School of Civil Engineering, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban 4041, South Africa
S. E. BELCHER
Affiliation:
Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6BB, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The interactions between shear-free turbulence in two regions (denoted as + and − on either side of a nearly flat horizontal interface are shown here to be controlled by several mechanisms, which depend on the magnitudes of the ratios of the densities, ρ+/ρ−, and kinematic viscosities of the fluids, μ+/μ−, and the root mean square (r.m.s.) velocities of the turbulence, u0+/u0−, above and below the interface. This study focuses on gas–liquid interfaces so that ρ+/ρ− ≪ 1 and also on where turbulence is generated either above or below the interface so that u0+/u0− is either very large or very small. It is assumed that vertical buoyancy forces across the interface are much larger than internal forces so that the interface is nearly flat, and coupling between turbulence on either side of the interface is determined by viscous stresses. A formal linearized rapid-distortion analysis with viscous effects is developed by extending the previous study by Hunt & Graham (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 84, 1978, pp. 209–235) of shear-free turbulence near rigid plane boundaries. The physical processes accounted for in our model include both the blocking effect of the interface on normal components of the turbulence and the viscous coupling of the horizontal field across thin interfacial viscous boundary layers. The horizontal divergence in the perturbation velocity field in the viscous layer drives weak inviscid irrotational velocity fluctuations outside the viscous boundary layers in a mechanism analogous to Ekman pumping. The analysis shows the following. (i) The blocking effects are similar to those near rigid boundaries on each side of the interface, but through the action of the thin viscous layers above and below the interface, the horizontal and vertical velocity components differ from those near a rigid surface and are correlated or anti-correlated respectively. (ii) Because of the growth of the viscous layers on either side of the interface, the ratio uI/u0, where uI is the r.m.s. of the interfacial velocity fluctuations and u0 the r.m.s. of the homogeneous turbulence far from the interface, does not vary with time. If the turbulence is driven in the lower layer with ρ+/ρ− ≪ 1 and u0+/u0− ≪ 1, then uI/u0− ~ 1 when Re (=u0−L−/ν−) ≫ 1 and R = (ρ−/ρ+)(v−/v+)1/2 ≫ 1. If the turbulence is driven in the upper layer with ρ+/ρ− ≪ 1 and u0+/u0− ≫ 1, then uI/u0+ ~ 1/(1 + R). (iii) Nonlinear effects become significant over periods greater than Lagrangian time scales. When turbulence is generated in the lower layer, and the Reynolds number is high enough, motions in the upper viscous layer are turbulent. The horizontal vorticity tends to decrease, and the vertical vorticity of the eddies dominates their asymptotic structure. When turbulence is generated in the upper layer, and the Reynolds number is less than about 106–107, the fluctuations in the viscous layer do not become turbulent. Nonlinear processes at the interface increase the ratio uI/u0+ for sheared or shear-free turbulence in the gas above its linear value of uI/u0+ ~ 1/(1 + R) to (ρ+/ρ−)1/2 ~ 1/30 for air–water interfaces. This estimate agrees with the direct numerical simulation results from Lombardi, De Angelis & Bannerjee (Phys. Fluids, vol. 8, no. 6, 1996, pp. 1643–1665). Because the linear viscous–inertial coupling mechanism is still significant, the eddy motions on either side of the interface have a similar horizontal structure, although their vertical structure differs.

JFM classification

Geophysical and Geological Flows: Air/sea interactions Turbulent Flows: Turbulence theory
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 671 , 25 March 2011 , pp. 96 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Belcher, S. E. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1998 Turbulent air flow over hills and waves. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30, 507–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brocchini, M. & Peregrine, D. H. 2001 The dynamics of strong turbulence at free surface. Part 2. Free-surface boundary conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 449, 255–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brutsaert, W. & Jirka, G. H. (Ed.) 1984 Gas Transfer at Liquid Surfaces. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calmet, I. & Magnaudet, J. 2003 Statistical structure of high Reynolds number turbulence close to the free surface of an open channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 474, 355–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, D. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1986 Velocity fluctuations near an interface between a turbulent region and a stably stratified layer. J. Fluid Mech. 156, 475–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csanady, G. T. 1997 The ‘slip law’ of the free surface. J. Oceanogr. 53, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danckwerts, P. V. 1951 Significance of liquid-film coefficients in gas absorption. Indust. Engng Chem. 43 (6), 1460–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eames, I. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1997 Inviscid flow around bodies moving in weak density gradients without buoyancy effects. J. Fluid Mech. 353, 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorov, A. V. & Melville, W. K. 1988 Nonlinear gravity–capillary waves with forcing and dissipation. J. Fluid Mech. 354, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernando, H. J. S. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1997 Turbulence, waves and mixing at shear-free density interfaces. Part 1. A theoretical model. J. Fluid Mech. 347, 197–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulgosi, M., Lakeland, D., Banerjee, S. & de Angelis, V. 2003 Direct numerical simulation of turbulence in a sheared air–water flow with a deformable interface. J. Fluid Mech. 482, 319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, A. E. 1993 Atmosphere–Ocean Dynamics. Academic.Google Scholar
Guezennec, Y., Stretch, D. D. & Kim, J. 1990 The structure of turbulent channel flow with passive scalar transport. In Studying Turbulence Using Numerical Simulation Databases, 3: Proceedings of the Summer Program 1990 (ed. Moin, P., Reynolds, W. C. & Kim, J.), pp. 127–138. Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, Y. & Kasagi, N. 2009 Hybrid DNS/LES of high Schmidt number mass transfer across turbulent air–water interface. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 52, 1012–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R. 1984 Turbulence structure in thermal convection and shear-free boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 138, 161–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R. & Carruthers, D. J. 1990 Rapid distortion theory and the problems of turbulence J. Fluid Mech. 212, 497–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R. & Durbin, P. A. 1999 Perturbed vortical layers and shear sheltering. Fluid Dyn. Res. 24, 375–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R. & Graham, J. M. R. 1978 Free-stream turbulence near plane boundaries. J. Fluid Mech. 84, 209–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R., Vrieling, A. J., Nieuwstadt, F. T. M. & Fernando, H. J. S. 2003 The influence of the thermal diffusivity of the lower boundary on eddy motion in convection. J. Fluid Mech. 491, 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeler, R. N., Bondur, V. G. & Gibson, C. H. 2005 Optical satellite imagery detection of internal wave effects from a submerged turbulent outfall in the stratified ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L12610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., Moin, P. & Moser, R. 1987 Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komori, S., Nagaosa, R. & Murakami, Y. 1993 Turbulence structure and mass transfer across a sheared air–water interface in wind-driven turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 249, 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, H., Moin, P. & Kim, J. 1997 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step. J. Fluid Mech. 330, 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. J. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1988 The structure of sheared turbulence near a plane boundary. In Studying Turbulence Using Numerical Simulation Databases, 2. Proceedings of the Summer Program 1988 (ed. Moin, P., Reynolds, W. C. & Kim, J.), pp. 221–242. Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Lin, M.-Y., Moeng, C.-H., Tsai, W., Sullivan, P. P. & Belcher, S. E. 2008 Direct simulation of wind wave generation processes. J. Fluid Mech. 616, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardi, P., De Angelis, V. & Bannerjee, S. 1996 Direct numerical simulations of near-interface turbulence in coupled gas–liquid flows. Phys. Fluids 8 (6), 1643–1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnaudet, J. 2003 High-Reynolds-number turbulence in a shear-free boundary layer: revisiting the Hunt–Graham theory. J. Fluid Mech. 484, 167–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, J. 1994 The spatial structure of surface-layer turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 273, 141–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagata, K., Wong, H., Hunt, J. C. R., Sajjadi, S. G. & Davidson, P. A. 2006 Weak mean flows induced by anisotropic turbulence impinging onto planar and undulating surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 556, 329–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1955 The irrotational motion outside a free turbulent boundary. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 51, 220–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozenberg, A., Matusov, P. & Mellvile, W. K. 1998 Polarized microwave setting by surface water waves and turbulence. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 34 (6), 1331–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takagaki, N. & Komori, S. 2007 Effects of rainfall on mass transfer across the air–water interface. J. Geophys. Res. 112, C06006.Google Scholar
Teixeira, M. A. C. & Belcher, S. E. 2002 On the distortion of turbulence by a progressive surface wave. J. Fluid Mech. 458, 229–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teixeira, M. A. C. & Belcher, S. E. 2006 Initiation of surface waves by turbulence. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 41, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. M. & Turner, J. S. 1975 Mixing across an interface due to turbulence generated by an oscillating grid. J. Fluid Mech. 67, 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, S. A. 2004 Langmuir circulation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flows. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tsai, W. T. 1998 A numerical study of the evolution and structure of a turbulent shear layer under a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 354, 239–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, P. C. & Fernando, H. J. S. 1999 An analyses of turbulent motions in and around a differential forced density interface. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 13, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaki, T. A. & Saha, S. 2009 On shear-sheltering and the structure of vortical modes in single and two-fluid boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 626, 111–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilitinkevich, S. S., Hunt, J. C. R., Esau, I. N., Grachev, A. A., Lalas, D. P., Akylas, E., Tombrou, M., Fairall, C. W., Fernando, H. J. S., Baklanov, A. & Joffre, S. M. 2006 The influence of large convective eddies on the surface layer turbulence. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 132, 1423–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar