Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:29:41.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Viscous and electro-osmotic effects upon motion of an oil droplet through a capillary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2020

P. Grassia Open the ORCID record for P. Grassia [Opens in a new window]
P. Grassia*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Strathclyde, James Weir Building, 75 Montrose St., GlasgowG1 1XJ, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the context of waterflooding in oil recovery, the motion of an oil droplet through a capillary pore initially filled with aqueous liquid is considered. The droplet is affected by capillary and viscous forces, with a thin aqueous film being formed between the droplet and capillary wall. Moreover, the droplet surface and capillary wall surface have opposite and equal electrical charge. Attractive electro-osmotic interactions then tend to thin the film. A case is considered in which electro-osmotic interactions are strong and capillary forces are inherently weak, leading, in the first instance, to a viscous, electro-osmotic balance. Solutions are obtained for the droplet shape close to its front end. Whilst visco-electro-osmotic dominated solutions can indeed be found, additional solution classes are identified for which the film thickness oscillates with longitudinal position, and capillary forces regain importance. A parametric study is presented indicating that oscillation length scales along the film can be selected such that capillary effects never become negligible. Moreover gradients of electro-osmotic conjoining pressures are small in thinner parts of the film, even though electro-osmotic conjoining pressures themselves are not. Thus, rather than a visco-electro-osmotic balance being the norm, a capillary, viscous balance results in thinner parts of the film, giving way to a capillary, electro-osmotic balance in thicker parts. However, solutions are non-unique, and a given system can admit multiple solutions with films of various different thicknesses. Some of these solutions have films that increase monotonically in thickness with position, while others fall into the oscillatory class.

JFM classification

Drops and Bubbles: Drops Interfacial Flows (free surface): Capillary flows Low-Reynolds-number flows: Porous media
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 899 , 25 September 2020 , A31
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anna, S. L., Bontoux, N. & Stone, H. A. 2003 Formation of dispersions using ‘flow focusing’ in microchannels. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 364–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austad, T., Rezaei Doust, A. & Puntervold, T. 2010 Chemical mechanism of low salinity water flooding in sandstone reservoirs. In SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, OK. Society of Petroleum Engineers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretherton, F. P. 1961 The motion of long bubbles in tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 10, 166–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, J. S. 1996 Mechanisms and consequences of wettability alteration by crude oils. PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Geraud, B., Jones, S. A., Cantat, I., Dollet, B. & Meheust, Y. 2016 The flow of a foam in a two-dimensional porous medium. Water Resour. Res. 52, 773–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassia, P. 2019 Motion of an oil droplet through a capillary with charged surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 866, 721–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krechetnikov, R. & Homsy, G. M. 2005 Dip coating in the presence of a substrate-liquid interaction potential. Phys. Fluids 17, 102105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzmak, G. E. 1959 Asymptotic solutions of nonlinear second order differential equations with variable coefficients. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 23, 730–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lager, A., Webb, K., Black, C., Singleton, M. & Sorbie, K. 2008 Low salinity oil recovery: an experimental investigation. Petrophysics 49, 28–35.Google Scholar
Lee, S., Webb, K., Collins, I., Lager, A., Clarke, S., O'Sullivan, M., Routh, A. & Wang, X. 2010 Low salinity oil recovery: increasing understanding of the underlying mechanisms. In SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, OK. Society of Petroleum Engineers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, W. C. M. 1937 The electric charge at an oil-water interface. Trans. Faraday Soc. 33, 708–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. & Xu, R. 2008 Electrical double layers interaction between oppositely charged particles as related to surface charge density and ionic strength. Colloids Surf. A 326, 157–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligthelm, D. J., Gronsveld, J., Hofman, J., Brussee, N., Marcelis, F. & van der Linde, H. 2009 Novel waterflooding strategy by manipulation of injection brine composition. In EUROPEC/EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Society of Petroleum Engineers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmberg, C. G. & Maryott, A. A. 1956 Dielectric constant of water from 0° to 100°C. J. Res. Natl Bur. Stand. 56, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, P. L., Chatham, J. R., Paskvan, F. K., Sommer, D. M. & Carini, F. H. 2005 Low salinity oil recovery: an exciting new EOR opportunity for Alaska's north slope. In SPE Western Regional Meeting, Irvine, CA. Society of Petroleum Engineers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, P. 2009 Pore-throat sizes in sandstones, tight sandstones, and shales. AAPG Bull. 93, 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, C. W. & Homsy, G. M. 1984 Two-phase displacement in Hele Shaw cells: theory. J. Fluid Mech. 139, 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. & Flannery, B. P. 1992 Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rezaei Doust, A., Puntervold, T. & Austad, T. 2011 Chemical verification of the EOR mechanism by using low saline/smart water in sandstone. Energy Fuels 25, 2151–2162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teh, S.-Y., Lin, R., Hung, L.-H. & Lee, A. P. 2008 Droplet microfluidics. Lab on a Chip 8, 198–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teletzke, G. F., Davis, H. T. & Scriven, L. E. 1987 How liquids spread on solids. Chem. Engng Commun. 55, 41–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teletzke, G. F., Davis, H. T. & Scriven, L. E. 1988 Wetting hydrodynamics. Rev. Phys. Appl. 23, 989–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waghmare, P. R. & Mitra, S. K. 2008 Investigation of combined electro-osmotic and pressure-driven flow in rough microchannels. Trans. ASME: J. Fluids Engng 130, 061204.Google Scholar
Willhite, G. P. 1986 Waterflooding. Society of Petroleum Engineers.Google Scholar
Wilmott, Z. M., Breward, C. J. & Chapman, S. J. 2018 The effect of ions on the motion of an oil slug through a charged capillary. J. Fluid Mech. 841, 310–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, H., Radke, C. J. & Morris, S. 1995 a The motion of long bubbles in polygonal capillaries. Part 1. Thin films. J. Fluid Mech. 292, 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, H., Radke, C. J. & Morris, S. 1995 b The motion of long bubbles in polygonal capillaries. Part 2. Drag, fluid pressure and fluid flow. J. Fluid Mech. 292, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, M. R. 2007 An Introduction to Aqueous Electrolyte Solutions. Wiley.Google Scholar
Yang, R.-J., Fu, L.-M. & Hwang, C.-C. 2001 Electroosmotic entry flow in a microchannel. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 244, 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yildiz, H. & Morrow, N. 1996 Effect of brine composition on recovery of Moutray crude oil by waterflooding. J. Petrol. Sci. Engng 14, 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar