Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:02:45.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Turbulence structure in boundary layers over periodic two- and three-dimensional roughness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

RALPH J. VOLINO ,
MICHAEL P. SCHULTZ  and
KAREN A. FLACK
RALPH J. VOLINO*
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD 21402, USA
MICHAEL P. SCHULTZ
Affiliation:
Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering Department, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD 21402, USA
KAREN A. FLACK
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD 21402, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Measurements are presented from turbulent boundary layers over periodic two- and three-dimensional roughness. Cases with transverse rows of staggered cubes and cases with solid square transverse bars of two sizes were considered. Previous results by Volino, Schultz & Flack (J. Fluid Mech. vol. 635, 2009, p. 75) showed outer-layer similarity between cases with three-dimensional roughness and smooth walls, and deviations from similarity in cases with large two-dimensional transverse bars. The present results show that differences also occur with small two-dimensional bars and to a lesser extent when the bars are replaced with rows of staggered cubes. Differences are most apparent in correlations of turbulence quantities, which are of larger spatial extent for the rough-wall cases. The results with the staggered cubes indicate that part of the periodic roughness effect is caused by the repeated disturbance and recovery of the boundary layer as it encounters a row of roughness followed by a smooth surface. A larger effect, however, is due to the blockage caused by the two-dimensional transverse bars, which extend across the entire width of the boundary layer. The small two-dimensional bars have a larger effect than the staggered cubes, in spite of the bar height being only 11 viscous units and 1/7 of the cube height. The effect of the small bars extends well into the outer flow, indicating that effects observed previously with larger bars were not due only to a thickening of the roughness sublayer. The observed differences between the rough- and smooth-wall results are believed to be caused by large-scale attached eddies which extend from the roughness elements to the edge of the boundary layer.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary layer structure Turbulent Flows: Turbulent boundary layers
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 676 , 10 June 2011 , pp. 172 - 190
Creative Commons
This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011. This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adrian, R. J. 1983 Laser velocimetry. In Fluid Mechanics Measurements (ed. Goldstein, R. J.). Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Adrian, R. J., Meinhart, C. D. & Tomkins, C. D. 2000 Vortex organization in the outer region of the turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 422, 1–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchhave, P., George, W. K. & Lumley, J. L. 1979 The measurement of turbulence with the laser-Doppler anemometer. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 11, 443–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, I. P. 2007 Rough-wall boundary layers: mean flow universality. J. Fluid Mech. 585, 469–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, M. S., Perry, A. E. & Cantwell, B. J. 1990 A general classification of 3-dimensional flow-fields. Phys. Fluids A: Fluid Dyn. 2, 765–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, K. T. & Wu, Y. 2005 Characteristics of vortex organization in the outer layer of wall turbulence. In Proceedings of Fourth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, Williamsburg, VA, vol. 3, pp. 1025–1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, J. S., Schultz, M. P. & Flack, K. A. 2006 Velocity-defect scaling for turbulent boundary layers with a range of relative roughness. Exp. Fluids 40, 188–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djenidi, L., Antonia, R. A., Amielh, M. & Anselmet, F. 2008 A turbulent boundary layer over a two-dimensional rough wall. Exp. Fluids 44, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durst, F., Fischer, M., Jovanovic, J. & Kikura, H. 1998 Methods to set up and investigate low Reynolds number, fully developed turbulent plane channel flows. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 120, 496–503.Google Scholar
Edwards, R. V. 1987 Report of the special panel on statistical particle bias problems in laser anemometry. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 109, 89–93.Google Scholar
Flack, K. A. & Schultz, M. P. 2010 Review of hydraulic roughness scales in the fully rough regime. J. Fluids Engng 132, 041203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flack, K. A., Schultz, M. P. & Connelly, J. S. 2007 Examination of a critical roughness height for boundary layer similarity. Phys. Fluids 19, 095104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flack, K. A., Schultz, M. P. & Shapiro, T. A. 2005 Experimental support for Townsend's Reynolds number similarity hypothesis on rough walls. Phys. Fluids 17, 035102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furuya, Y., Miyata, M. & Fujita, H. 1976 Turbulent boundary layer and flow resistance on plates roughened by wires. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 98, 635–644.Google Scholar
Hutchins, N., Hambleton, W. T. & Marusic, I. 2005 Inclined cross-stream stereo particle image velocimetry measurements in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 541, 21–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, J. 2004 Turbulent flows over rough walls. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogstad, P.-Å., Andersson, H. I., Bakken, O. M. & Ashrafian, A. 2005 An experimental and numerical study of channel flow with rough walls. J. Fluid Mech. 530, 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogstad, P.-Å. & Antonia, R. A. 1999 Surface roughness effects in turbulent boundary layers. Exp. Fluids 27, 450–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunkel, G. J. & Marusic, I. 2006 Study of the near-wall-turbulent region of the high-Reynolds-number boundary layer using an atmospheric flow. J. Fluid Mech. 548, 375–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. H. & Sung, H. J. 2007 Direct numerical simulation of the turbulent boundary layer over a rod-roughened wall. J. Fluid Mech. 584, 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonardi, S., Castro, & , I. P. 2010 Channel flow over large cube roughness: a direct numerical simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 651, 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonardi, S., Orlandi, P., Smalley, R. J., Djenidi, L. & Antonia, R. A. 2003 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow with transverse bars on one wall. J. Fluid Mech. 491, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligrani, P. M. & Moffat, R. J. 1986 Structure of transitionally rough and fully rough turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 162, 69–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffat, R. J. 1988 Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 1, 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. E. & Chong, M. S. 1982 On the mechanism of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 119, 173–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. E. & Li, J. D. 1990 Experimental support for the attached-eddy hypothesis in zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 218, 405–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. E. & Marusic, I. 1995 A wall-wake model for the turbulence structure of boundary layers. Part 1. Extension of the attached eddy hypothesis. J. Fluid Mech. 298, 361–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. E., Marusic, I. & Jones, M. B. 2002 On the streamwise evolution of turbulent boundary layers in arbitrary pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mech. 461, 61–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. E., Schofield, W. H. & Joubert, P. 1969 Rough wall turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 165, 163–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raupach, M. R., Antonia, R. A. & Rajagopalan, S. 1991 Rough-wall turbulent boundary layers. Appl. Mech. Rev. 44, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlichting, H. 1979 Boundary-Layer Theory, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schultz, M. P. & Flack, K. A. 2007 The rough-wall turbulent boundary layer from the hydraulically smooth to the fully rough regime. J. Fluid Mech. 580, 381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shockling, M. A., Allen, J. J. & Smits, A. J. 2006 Roughness effects in turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 564, 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Volino, R. J., Schultz, M. P. & Flack, K. A. 2007 Turbulence structure in rough- and smooth-wall boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 592, 263–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volino, R. J., Schultz, M. P. & Flack, K. A. 2009 Turbulence structure in a boundary layer with two-dimensional roughness. J. Fluid Mech. 635, 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Y. & Christensen, K. T. 2007 Outer-layer similarity in the presence of a practical rough-wall topography. Phys. Fluids 19, 085108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., Adrian, R. J., Balachandar, S. & Kendall, T. M. 1999 Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 387, 353–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar