Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:00:47.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Topological interpretation of the surface flow visualization of conical viscous/inviscid interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

B. W. Van Oudheusden ,
C. Nebbeling  and
W. J. Bannink
B. W. Van Oudheusden
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology, Dept. Aerospace Engineering, Lab. for High Speed Aerodynamics, PO Box 5058, 2600 GB Delft, The Netherlands
C. Nebbeling
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology, Dept. Aerospace Engineering, Lab. for High Speed Aerodynamics, PO Box 5058, 2600 GB Delft, The Netherlands
W. J. Bannink
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology, Dept. Aerospace Engineering, Lab. for High Speed Aerodynamics, PO Box 5058, 2600 GB Delft, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The asymptotic flow structure is considered for a viscous–inviscid conical interaction, in particular that between a swept shock wave and a boundary layer. A flow model is devised based on the three-layer interaction concept. Assuming conicity of the inviscid flow regions, a viscous layer structure is established that is compatible with the inviscid outer flow, and which produces a geometrically conical surface flow pattern. This result is obtained from a dimensional analysis, which reveals similarity of the viscous layer in cross-flow planes at different radial distances from the conical origin. The results of this analysis provide a tool for the quantitative interpretation of surface flow visualizations in terms of the related topological structure of the flow in the cross-flow plane. This method is illustrated by application to the surface flow visualization of a Mach 3 shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 316 , 10 June 1996 , pp. 115 - 137
Copyright
© 1996 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvi, F. S. & Settles, G. S. 1992 Physical model of the swept shock wave/boundary-layer interaction flowfield. AIAA J. 30, 2252–2258.Google Scholar
Bakker, P. G. 1991 Bifurcations in Flow Patterns. Kluwer.
Bulakh, B. M. 1970 Nonlinear Conical Flow. Translated from the Russian, Delft University Press (1985).
Burggraf, O. R. 1975 Asymptotic theory of separation and reattachment of a laminar boundary layer on a compression ramp. AGARD CP-168, Flow Separation, Paper 10.
Burggraf, O. R., Rizzeta, D., Werle, M. J. & Vasta, V. N. 1979 Effect of Reynolds number on laminar separation of supersonic stream. AIAA J. 17, 336–343.Google Scholar
Charwat, A. F. & Redekeopp, L. G. 1967 Supersonic interference flow along the corner of intersecting wedges. AIAA J. 5, 480–488.Google Scholar
Clauser, F. H. 1954 Turbulent boundary layers in adverse pressure gradients. J. Aero. Sci. 21, 91–108.Google Scholar
Clauser, F. H. 1956 The turbulent boundary layer. Adv. Appl. Mech. 4, 1–51.Google Scholar
Inger, G. 1987 Spanwise propagation of upstream influence in conical swept shock/boundary layer interactions. AIAA J. 25, 287–293.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. W. & Smith, P. 1977 Nonlinear Ordinary Differential Equations. Clarendon Press.
Knight, D. D. 1993 Numerical simulation of 3D shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions. AGARD Rep. 792, Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions in Supersonic and Hypersonic Flows, pp. 3.1–3.32.
Knight, D. D., Badekas, D., Horstman, C. C. & Settles, G. S. 1992 Quasiconical flowfield structure of the three-dimensional single fin interaction. AIAA J. 30, 2809–2816.Google Scholar
Korkegi, R. H. 1976 On the structure of three-dimensional shock-induced separated flow regions. AIAA J. 14, 597–600.Google Scholar
Kubota, H. & Stollery, J. L. 1982 An experimental study of the interaction between a glancing shock wave and a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 116, 431–458.Google Scholar
McCabe, A. 1966 The three-dimensional interaction of a shock wave with a turbulent boundary layer. Aero. Q. 17, 231–252.Google Scholar
Oskam, B., Vas, I. E., & Bogdonoff, S. M. 1976 Mach 3 oblique shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions in three dimensions. AIAA Paper 76-366.
Panaras, A. G. 1992 Numerical investigation of the high-speed conical flow past a sharp fin. J. Fluid Mech. 236, 607–633.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. 1979 Boundary Layer Theory, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill.
Settles, G. S. 1993 Swept shock/boundary-layer interaction–scaling laws, flowfield structure and experimental methods. AGARD Rep. 792, Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions in Supersonic and Hypersonic Flows, pp. 1.1–1.40.
Settles, G. S. & Lu, F. K. 1985 Conical similarity of shock/boundary-layer interactions generated by swept and unswept fins. AIAA J. 23, 1021–1027.Google Scholar
Stanbrook, A. 1960 An experimental study of the glancing interaction between a shock wave and a turbulent boundary layer. ARC CP 555.
Stewartson, K. 1974 Multi-structured boundary layers on flat plates and related bodies. Adv. Appl. Mech. 14, 145–239.Google Scholar
Stollery, J. L. 1975 Laminar and turbulent boundary-layer separation at supersonic and hypersonic speeds. AGARD CP-168, Flow Separation, Paper 20.
Tennekes, H. & Lumley, J. L. 1972 A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press.
Van Oudheusden, B. W. 1995 The viscous layer scaling in conical flow interactions. 2nd ASME/JSME Symp. on Transitional and Turbulent Compressible Flows, Hilton Head, USA, 13–18 August 1995, FED-Vol. 224, pp. 109–116.
Van Oudheusden, B. W., Nebbeling, C. & Bannink, W. J. 1994 Surface flow visualization of a glancing shock-wave boundary-layer interaction. Rep. LR-771. Delft University of Technology, Dept. Aerospace Engineering.
Veldman, A. E. P. 1979 A numerical method for the calculation of laminar, incompressible boundary layers with strong viscous-inviscid interaction, NLR Rep. TR 79023U.
White, F. M. 1991 Viscous Fluid Flow, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill.