Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T09:25:30.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three-dimensional flow evolution after a dam break

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2010

A. FERRARI ,
L. FRACCAROLLO ,
M. DUMBSER ,
E. F. TORO  and
A. ARMANINI
A. FERRARI*
Affiliation:
Institute of Aerodynamics and Gasdynamics, Pfaffenwaldring 21, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
L. FRACCAROLLO
Affiliation:
University of Trento, Via Mesiano, 77, I-38100 Trento, Italy
M. DUMBSER
Affiliation:
Institute of Aerodynamics and Gasdynamics, Pfaffenwaldring 21, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany University of Trento, Via Mesiano, 77, I-38100 Trento, Italy
E. F. TORO
Affiliation:
University of Trento, Via Mesiano, 77, I-38100 Trento, Italy
A. ARMANINI
Affiliation:
University of Trento, Via Mesiano, 77, I-38100 Trento, Italy
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, the wave propagation on a plane dry bottom after a dam break is analysed. Two mathematical models have been used and compared with each other for simulating such a dam-break scenario. First, the fully three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations for a weakly compressible fluid have been solved using the new smooth particle hydrodynamics formulation, recently proposed by Ferrari et al. (Comput. Fluids, vol. 38, 2009, p. 1203). Second, the two-dimensional shallow water equations (SWEs) are solved using a third-order weighted essentially non-oscillatory finite-volume scheme. The numerical results are critically compared against the laboratory measurements provided by Fraccarollo & Toro (J. Hydraul. Res., vol. 33, 1995, p. 843). The experimental data provide the temporal evolution of the pressure field, the water depth and the vertical velocity profile at 40 gauges, located in the reservoir and in front of the gate. Our analysis reveals the shortcomings of SWEs in the initial stages of the dam-break phenomenon in reproducing many important flow features of the unsteady free-surface flow: the shallow water model predicts a complex wave structure and a wavy evolution of local free-surface elevations in the reservoir that can be clearly identified to be only model artefacts. However, the quasi-incompressible Navier–Stokes model reproduces well the high gradients in the flow field and predicts the cycles of simultaneous rapid decreasing and frozen stages of the free surface in the tank along with the velocity oscillations. Asymptotically, i.e. for ‘large times’, the shallow water model and the weakly compressible Navier–Stokes model agree well with the experimental data, since the classical SWE assumptions are satisfied only at large times.

JFM classification

Mathematical Foundations: Computational methods Waves/Free-surface Flows: Hydraulics
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 663 , 25 November 2010 , pp. 456 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Batchelor, G. K. 1974 An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dumbser, M., Balsara, D., Toro, E. F. & Munz, C. D. 2008 A unified framework for the construction of one-step finite-volume and discontinuous Galerkin schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 227, 8209–8253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumbser, M., Castro, M., Toro, C. & Pares, E. F. 2009 ADER scheme on unstructured meshes for non-conservative hyperbolic equations: applications to geophysical flows. Comput. Fluids 38, 1731–1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumbser, M. & Käser, M. 2007 Arbitrary high order non-oscillatory finite volume schemes on unstructured meshes for linear hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys. 221, 693–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumbser, M., Käser, M., Titarev, V. A. & Toro, E. F. 2007 Quadrature-free non-oscillatory finite volume schemes on unstructured meshes for nonlinear hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys. 226, 204–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, A. 2009 A New Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics Scheme for 3D Free Surface Flows. VDI.Google Scholar
Ferrari, A. 2010 SPH simulation of free surface flow over a sharp-crested weir. Adv. Water Res. 33, 270–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, A., Dumbser, M., Toro, E. F. & Armanini, A. 2009 A new 3D parallel SPH scheme for free surface flows. Comput. Fluids 38, 1203–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraccarollo, L. & Toro, E. F. 1995 Experimental and numerical assessment of the shallow water model for two-dimensional dam-break type problems. J. Hydraul. Res. 33, 843–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goutal, N. & Maurel, F. 1997 Proceedings of the second workshop on dam-break wave simulation. Tech Rep. HE-43/97/016/A. Electrité de France, Département Laboratoire National d'Hydraulique, Groupe Hydraulique Fluviale.Google Scholar
Gratton, J. & Vigo, C. 1994 Self-similar gravity currents with variable inflow revisited: plane currents. J. Fluid Mech. 258, 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liou, M.-S. & Steffen, C. 1993 A new flux splitting scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 107, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, J. J. 1994 Simulating free surface flows with SPH. J. Comput. Phys. 110, 399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, J. J. & Lattanzio, J. C. 1985 A refined particle method for astrophysical problems. Astron. Astrophys. 149, 135–143.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. & Hogg, A. J. 2002 On sediment transport under dam-break flow. Fluid Mech. 473, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quecedo, M. & Pastor, M. 2002 A reappraisal of the Taylor–Galerkin algorithm for drying–wetting areas in shallow-water computations. Intl J. Numer. Methods Fluids 38, 515–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quecedo, M., Pastor, M., Herreros, M. I. & Merodo, J. A. F. 2004 Numerical modelling of the propagation of fast landslides using the finite element method. Intl J. Numer. Methods Engng 59, 755–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quecedo, M., Pastor, M., Herreros, M. I., Merodo, J. A. F. & Zhang, Q. 2005 Comparison of two mathematical models for solving the dam break problem using the FEM method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engng 194, 3834–4005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, A. 1892 Die Fortpflanzung der Wasserwellen. Z. Verein. Deutsch. Ing. 36, 947–954.Google Scholar
Rouse, H. 1950 Engineering Hydraulics. Wiley.Google Scholar
Stansby, P. K., Chegini, A. & Barnes, T. C. D. 1998 The initial stages of dam-break flow. J. Fluid Mech. 374, 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, J. J. 1957 Water Waves: The Mathematical Theory with Applications. Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Toro, E. F. 1992 Riemann problems and the WAF method for solving the two-dimensional shallow water equations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 338, 43–68.Google Scholar
Toro, E. F., Hidalgo, A. & Dumbser, M. 2009 FORCE schemes on unstructured meshes. Part I. conservative hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 3368–3389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar