Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T07:34:30.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A three-dimensional computation of the force and torque on an ellipsoid settling slowly through a viscoelastic fluid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

J. Feng Feng
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, and the Minnesota Supercomputer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
D. D. Joseph
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, and the Minnesota Supercomputer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
R. Glowinski
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA
T. W. Pan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204, USA

Abstract

The orientation of an ellipsoid falling in a viscoelastic fluid is studied by methods of perturbation theory. For small fall velocity, the fluid's rheology is described by a second-order fluid model. The solution of the problem can be expressed by a dual expansion in two small parameters: the Reynolds number representing the inertial effect and the Weissenberg number representing the effect of the non-Newtonian stress. Then the original problem is split into three canonical problems: the zeroth-order Stokes problem for a translating ellipsoid and two first-order problems, one for inertia and one for second-order rheology. A Stokes operator is inverted in each of the three cases. The problems are solved numerically on a three-dimensional domain by a finite element method with fictitious domains, and the force and torque on the body are evaluated. The results show that the signs of the perturbation pressure and velocity around the particle for inertia are reversed by viscoelasticity. The torques are also of opposite sign: inertia turns the major axis of the ellipsoid perpendicular to the fall direction; normal stresses turn the major axis parallel to the fall. The competition of these two effects gives rise to an equilibrium tilt angle between 0° and 90° which the settling ellipsoid would eventually assume. The equilibrium tilt angle is a function of the elasticity number, which is the ratio of the Weissenberg number and the Reynolds number. Since this ratio is independent of the fall velocity, the perturbation results do not explain the sudden turning of a long body which occurs when a critical fall velocity is exceeded. This is not surprising because the theory is valid only for slow sedimentation. However, the results do seem to agree qualitatively with ‘shape tilting’ observed at low fall velocities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1995 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astarita, G. & Marrucci, G. 1974 Principles of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics. McGraw-Hill.
Brunn, P. 1977 The slow motion of a rigid particle in a second-order fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 82, 529550.Google Scholar
Cox, R. G. 1965 The steady motion of a particle of arbitrary shape at small Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 23, 625643.Google Scholar
Feng, J., Hu, H. H. & Joseph, D. D. 1994 Direct simulation of the initial value problems for the motion of solid body in a Newtonian fluid. Part 1. sedimentation. J. Fluid Mech. 261, 95134.Google Scholar
Glowinski, R., Pan, T. W. & Periaux, J. 1994 A fictitious domain method for external incompressible viscous flow modeled by Navier-Stokes equations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engng 112, 133148.Google Scholar
Happel, J. & Brenner, H. 1986 Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics. Martinus Nijhoff.
Joseph, D. D. 1990 Fluid Dynamics of Viscoelastic Liquids. Springer-Verlag.
Joseph, D. D. 1992 Bernoulli equation and the competition of elastic and inertial pressures in the potential flow of a second order fluid. J. Non-Newtonian. Fluid Mech. 42, 385389.Google Scholar
Joseph, D. D. & Liu, Y. J. 1993 Orientation of long bodies falling in a viscoelastic liquid. J. Rheol. 37 (6), 122.Google Scholar
Joseph, D. D., Liu, Y. J., Poletto, M. & Feng, J. 1994 Aggregation and dispersion of spheres falling in viscoelastic liquids. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 54, 4586.Google Scholar
Joseph, D. D., Nelson, J., Hu, H. H. & Liu, Y. J. 1992 Competition between inertial pressure and normal stresses in the flow induced anisotropy of solid particles. In Theoretical and Applied Rheology, Proc. XIth Intl Congr. on Rheology, Brussels, August 17–21 (ed. P. Moldenaers & R. Keunings), pp. 6065. Elsevier.
Leal, L. G. 1975 The slow motion of slender rod-like particles in a second-order fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 69, 305337.Google Scholar
Leslie, F. M. 1961 The slow flow of a visco-elastic liquid past a sphere. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 14, 3648.Google Scholar
Liu, Y. J. & Joseph, D. D. 1993 Sedimentation of particles in polymer solutions. J. Fluid Mech. 255, 565595.Google Scholar
Liu, Y. J., Nelson, J., Feng, J. & Joseph, D. D. 1993 Anomalous rolling of spheres down an inclined plane. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 50, 305329.Google Scholar