Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:31:15.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of Bénard convection with and without rotation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

H. T. Rossby
H. T. Rossby
Affiliation:
Department of Meteorology Massachusetts Institute of Technology Present address: Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An experimental study of the response of a thin uniformly heated rotating layer of fluid is presented. It is shown that the stability of the fluid depends strongly upon the three parameters that described its state, namely the Rayleigh number, the Taylor number and the Prandtl number. For the two Prandtl numbers considered, 6·8 and 0·025 corresponding to water and mercury, linear theory is insufficient to fully describe their stability properties. For water, subcritical instability will occur for all Taylor numbers greater than 5 × 104, whereas mercury exhibits a subcritical instability only for finite Taylor numbers less than 105. At all other Taylor numbers there is good agreement between linear theory and experiment.

The heat flux in these two fluids has been measured over a wide range of Rayleigh and Taylor numbers. Generally, much higher Nusselt numbers are found with water than with mercury. In water, at any Rayleigh number greater than 104, it is found that the Nusselt number will increase by about 10% as the Taylor number is increased from zero to a certain value, which depends on the Rayleigh number. It is suggested that this increase in the heat flux results from a perturbation of the velocity boundary layer with an ‘Ekman-layer-like’ profile in such a way that the scale of boundary layer is reduced. In mercury, on the other hand, the heat flux decreases monotonically with increasing Taylor number. Over a range of Rayleigh numbers (at large Taylor numbers) oscillatory convection is preferred although it is inefficient at transporting heat. Above a certain Rayleigh number, less than the critical value for steady convection according to linear theory, the heat flux increases more rapidly and the convection becomes increasingly irregular as is shown by the temperature fluctuations at a point in the fluid.

Photographs of the convective flow in a silicone oil (Prandtl number = 100) at various rotation rates are shown. From these a rough estimate is obtained of the dominant horizontal convective scale as a function of the Rayleigh and Taylor numbers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , 14 April 1969 , pp. 309 - 335
Copyright
© 1969 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Busse, F. 1966 Unpublished manuscript.
Chandrasekhar, S. 1961 Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. Oxford University Press.
Dow, CORNING, Chemical Products Division, 1963 Bulletin no. 05–061.
Fowlis, W. W. & Hide, R. 1965 Thermal convection in a rotating annulus of liquid: effect of viscosity on the transition between axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric flow régimes. J. Atmos. Sci. 22, 541–58.Google Scholar
Fultz, D. & Nakagawa, Y. 1955 Experiments on over-stable thermal convection in mercury. Proc. Roy. Soc A 231, 211–25.Google Scholar
Globe, S. & Dropkin, D. 1959 Natural convection heat transfer in liquids confined by two horizontal plates and heated from below J. Heat Transfer, 81, 24–8.Google Scholar
Goroff, I. R. 1960 An experiment on heat transfer by over-stable and ordinary eonvection. Proc. Roy. Soc A 254, 537–41.Google Scholar
Herring, J. R. 1963 Investigations of problems in thermal convection J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 325–38.Google Scholar
Ingersoll, A. P. 1965 Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University.
International Critical Tables 1928 New York: Wiley.
Koshmieder, E. L. 1966 On convection on a uniformly heated plane Beit. Phys. Atmos. 39, 1.Google Scholar
Liquid Metals Handbook 1953 Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Malkus, W. V. R. 1954 Discrete transitions in turbulent convection. Proc. Roy. Soc A 225, 185–95.Google Scholar
Mull, W. & Reiher, H. 1930 Der Wärmeschutz von Luftschichten. Beih. Gesundh. Ing. Ser. 1, 28.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, Y. & Frenzen, P. 1955 A theoretical and experimental study of cellular convection in rotating fluids Tellus, 7, 1–21.Google Scholar
Niiler, P. P. & Bisshopp, F. E. 1965 On the influence of the Coriolis force on the onset of thermal convection J. Fluid Mech. 22, 753–61.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. J. & Milverton, S. W. 1935 On the instability of a fluid when heated from below. Proc. Roy. Soc A 152, 586–94.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. J. & Saunders, D. A. 1938 On the motion of a fluid heated from below. Proc. Roy. Soc A 165, 216–28.Google Scholar
Silveston, P. L. 1958 Wärmedurchgang in Waagerechten Flüssigkeitsschichten Forsch. Ing. Wes. 24, 59–69.Google Scholar
Spiegel, E. A. & Veronis, G. 1960 On the Boussinesq approximation for a compressible fluid Astrophys. J. 131, 442–7.Google Scholar
Tables of Physical and Chemical Constants 1959 12th edition. Longmans.
Veronis, G. 1959 Cellular convection with finite amplitude in a rotating fluid J. Fluid Mech. 5, 401–35.Google Scholar
Veronis, G. 1966 Motions at subcritical values of the Rayleigh number in a rotating fluid J. Fluid Mech. 24, 545–54.Google Scholar
Weiss, N. O. 1964 Convection in the presence of restraints. Phil. Trans A 256, 99–147.Google Scholar