Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T01:04:07.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stability of convection in containers of arbitrary shape

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

Daniel D. Joseph
Daniel D. Joseph
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn. 55455
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When a container of fluid of arbitrary shape is heated from below and the temperature gradient exceeds a critical value ([Rscr ]c2) the conduction solution with no motion becomes unstable and is replaced by convection. The convection may have two forms: one with ‘upflow’ at the centre of the container and one with ‘downflow’ there. Here we study the stability of the two forms of convection. Both forms are here shown to be stable to infinitesimal disturbances. When the viscosity varies with the temperature or the conduction profile is not linear, etc., the steady convection can be driven with finite amplitudes |ε| at subcritical values of the temperature contrast ([Rscr ]2 < [Rscr ]c2). This subcritical convection is stable when the convection is strong (|ε| > |ε*| > 0) but is unstable when the convection is feeble (|ε| > |ε*|). Hence, when |ε| > |ε*| and [Rscr ]2 < [Rscr ]c2 either ‘upflow’ or ‘downflow’, but not both, is stable. When [Rscr ]2 > [Rscr ]c2, however, both the ‘upflow’ and the ‘downflow’ can be stable. This contrasts with the corresponding situation which is known to hold when the container is an unbounded layer. In the layer there is only one stable form of convection. The difference between the bounded domain with two forms of convection and the layer with just one stable form is traced to the mathematical property of simplicity of [Rscr ]c2 when viewed as an eigenvalue of the linear stability problem for the conduction solution. It is argued that [Rscr ]c2 is a simple eigenvalue in most domains, but in the layer [Rscr ]c2 can have infinite multiplicity. The explanation of the transition from the bounded domain to the unbounded layer is sought (1) in the chaotic conditions which frequently prevail at the edges of a ‘bounded’ layer and (2) in the fact that in the layer of large horizontal extent, the higher eigenvalues crowd [Rscr ]c2. In the course of the explanation, a new exact solution of the linear Bénard problem in a cylinder with a rigid side wall and a stress-free top and bottom is derived.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , 31 May 1971 , pp. 257 - 282
Copyright
© 1971 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohr, H. 1932 Almost Periodic Functions. New York: Chelsea Publishing Co.
Boussinesq, J. 1903 Théorie analytique de la chaleur. vol. 2. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
Busse, F. 1962 Ph.D. dissertation, Munich.
Busse, F. 1967 The stability of finite amplitude cellular convection and its relation to an extremum principle J. Fluid Mech. 30, 625.Google Scholar
Davis, S. 1967 Convection in a box: linear theory. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 465–479.Google Scholar
Davis, S. & Segel, L. 1968 Effects of surface curvature and property variation in cellular convection Phys. Fluids, 11, 470–477.Google Scholar
Fife, P. 1970 The Bénard problem for general fluid dynamical equations and remarks on the Boussinesq equation Indiana Univ. Math. J. 20, 303–26.Google Scholar
Fife, P. & Joseph, D. 1969 Existence of convective solutions of the generalized Bénard problem which are analytic in their norm Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 33, 116–138.Google Scholar
Goldstein, R. & Graham, D. 1969 Stability of a horizontal fluid layer with zero shear boundaries Phys. Fluids, 12, 1133–1137.Google Scholar
Graham, A. 1933 Shear patterns in an unstable layer of air. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 232, 285–297.Google Scholar
Kato, T. 1966 Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators. New York: Springer.
Jakob, M. 1949 Heat Transfer. New York: John Wiley.
KirchgÄssner, K. & Sorger, P. 1968 Stability analysis of branching solutions of the Navier—Stokes equations. Proc. XII. Int. Cong. Appl. Mech. Stanford.
Krishnamurti, R. 1968 Finite amplitude convection with changing mean temperature. Part I. Theory J. Fluid Mech. 33, 445–455.Google Scholar
Liang, S. F., Vidal, A. & Acrivos, A. 1969 Bouyancy-driven convection in cylindrical geometries J. Fluid Mech. 36, 239–255.Google Scholar
Lorenz, L. 1881 Uber das Leitungsvermögen der Metalle für Wärme und Electricität Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 13, 581.Google Scholar
Lortz, D. 1961 Dissertation, Munich.
Lortz, D. 1965 A stability criterion for steady finite amplitude convection J. Fluid Mech. 23, 113.Google Scholar
Malkus, W. V. R. & Veronis, G. 1958 Finite amplitude cellular convection J. Fluid Mech. 4, 225–269.Google Scholar
Mihaljan, J. 1962 A rigorous exposition of the Boussinesq approximations applicable to a thin layer of fluid Astrophys. J. 136, 1126–33.Google Scholar
Newell, A. & Whitehead, J. A. 1969 Finite bandwidth, finite amplitude convection J. Fluid Mech. 38, 279.Google Scholar
Oberbeck, A. 1879 Uber die Wärmeleitung der Flussigkeiten bei der Berüchsichtigung der Strömungen infolge von Temperaturdifferenzen Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 7, 271–292.Google Scholar
Oberbeck, A. 1891 Uber die bewegungsercheinungen der atmosphere. Sitz. Ber. K. Preuss. Akad. Miss. 383–395 and 1129–1138 (1888). Translated by C. Abee in Smiths Misc. Coll.Google Scholar
Palm, E. 1960 On the tendency towards hexagonal cells in steady convection J. Fluid Mech. 8, 183.Google Scholar
Palm, E. & Øiann, H. 1964 Contribution to the theory of cellular thermal convection J. Fluid Mech. 19, 353.Google Scholar
Pellew, A. & Southwell, R. V. 1940 On maintained convective motion in a fluid layer heated from below. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 176, 312–343.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord 1916 On convection currents in a horizontal layer of fluid when the higher temperature is on the underside Phil. Mag. 32, 529–546.Google Scholar
Sattinger, D. H. 1970 Stability of bifurcating solutions by Leray-Schauder degree. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. (to appear).Google Scholar
Scanlon, J. W. & Segel, L. A. 1967 Finite amplitude cellular convection induced by surface tension J. Fluid Mech. 30, 149.Google Scholar
Schluter, A., Lortz, D. & Busse, F. 1965 On the stability of steady finite amplitude cellular convection J. Fluid Mech. 23, 129–144.Google Scholar
Segel, L. 1969 Distant side-walls cause slow amplitude modulation of cellular convection J. Fluid Mech. 38, 203–224.Google Scholar
Segel, L. & Stuart, J. T. 1962 On the question of the preferred mode in cellular thermal convection J. Fluid Mech. 13, 289.Google Scholar
Tippelskirch, H. 1956 Uber Konvektionzellen, inbesondere im flüssigen Schwefel Beitr. Phys. frei Atmos. 29, 37.Google Scholar
Yudovich, V. I. 1965 Stability of steady flows of viscous incompressible fluid Soviet Physics-Doklady, 10, 293–295.Google Scholar
Yudovich, V. I. 1966 On the origin of convection J. Appl. Math. Mech. 30, 1193–1199.Google Scholar
Yudovich, V. I. 1967a Free convection and bifurcation J. Appl. Math. Mech. 31, 103–113.Google Scholar
Yudovich, V. I. 1967b Stability of convection flow J. Appl. Math. Mech. 31, 294–303.Google Scholar