Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:48:58.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Short-time Lyapunov exponent analysis and the transition to chaos in Taylor–Couette flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

John A. Vastano  and
Robert D. Moser
John A. Vastano
Affiliation:
Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Robert D. Moser
Affiliation:
NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Short-time Lyapunov exponent analysis is a new approach to the study of the stability properties of unsteady flows. At any instant in time the Lyapunov perturbations are the set of infinitesimal perturbations to a system state that will grow the fastest in the long term. Knowledge of these perturbations can allow one to determine the instability mechanisms producing chaos in the system. This new method should prove useful in a wide variety of chaotic flows. Here it is used to elucidate the physical mechanism driving weakly chaotic Taylor–Couette flow.

Three-dimensional, direct numerical simulations of axially periodic Taylor–Couette flow are used to study the transition from quasi-periodicity to chaos. A partial Lyapunov exponent spectrum for the flow is computed by simultaneously advancing the full solution and a set of perturbations. The axial wavelength and the particular quasi-periodic state are chosen to correspond to the most complete experimental studies of this transition. The computational results are consistent with available experimental data, both for the flow characteristics in the quasi-periodic regime and for the Reynolds number at which transition to chaos is observed.

The dimension of the chaotic attractor near onset is estimated from the Lyapunov exponent spectrum using the Kaplan–Yorke conjecture. This dimension estimate supports the experimental observation of low-dimensional chaos, but the dimension increases more rapidly away from the transition than is observed in experiments. Reasons for this disparity are given. Short-time Lyapunov exponent analysis is used to show that the chaotic state studied here is caused by a Kelvin–Helmholtz-type instability of the outflow boundary jet of the Taylor vortices.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 233 , December 1991 , pp. 83 - 118
Copyright
© 1991 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benettin, G., Galgani, L., Giorgilli, A. & Strelcyn, J.-M. 1980 Lyapunov characteristic exponents for smooth dynamical systems and for Hamiltonian systems; a method for computing all of them. Meccanica 15, 9–20.Google Scholar
Brandstater, A. 1984 Low dimensional chaos in a hydrodynamic system. Dissertation. Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel.
Brandstater, A., Swift, J., Swinney, H. L., Wolf, A., Farmer, J. D., Jen, E. & Crutchfield, J. P. 1983 Low-dimensional chaos in a hydrodynamic system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1442–1445.Google Scholar
Brandstater, A. & Swinney, H. L. 1987 Strange attractors in weakly turbulent Couette–Taylor flow. Phys. Rev. A 35, 2207–2220.Google Scholar
Constantin, P., Foias, C. & Temam, R. 1988 On the dimension of the attractors in two-dimensional turbulence. Physica 30 D, 284–296.Google Scholar
Coughlin, K. 1990 Quasiperiodic Taylor–Couette flow. Dissertation, Harvard University.
Diprima, R. C. & Swinney, H. L. 1981 Instabilities and transition in flow between concentric rotating cylinders. In Hydrodynamic Instabilities and the Transition to Turbulence (ed. H. L. Swinney & J. P. Gollub), pp. 139–180. Springer.
Eckmann, J.-P. & Ruelle, D. 1985 Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 617–655.Google Scholar
Fenstermacher, P. R., Swinney, H. L. & Gollub, J. P. 1979 Dynamical instabilities and the transition to chaotic Taylor vortex flow. J. Fluid Mech. 94, 103–128.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. M. & Swinney, H. L. 1986 Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. Phys. Rev. A 33, 1134–1140.Google Scholar
Frederickson, P., Kaplan, J. L., Yorke, E. D. & Yorke, J. A. 1983 The Lyapunov dimension of strange attractors. J. Diff Equat. 49, 185–196.Google Scholar
Goldhirsch, I., Sulem, P.-L. & Orszag, S. A. 1987 Stability and Lyapunov stability of dynamical systems: a differential approach and a numerical method. Physica 27 D, 311–337.Google Scholar
Gollub, J. P. & Swinney, H. L. 1975 Onset of turbulence in a rotating fluid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 927–930.Google Scholar
Gorman, M. & Swinney, H. L. 1982 Spatial and temporal characteristics of modulated waves in the circular Couette system. J. Fluid Mech. 117, 123–142.Google Scholar
Greene, J. M. & Kim, J.-S. 1987 The calculation of Lyapunov spectra. Physica. 24 D, 213–225.Google Scholar
Keefe, L., Moin, P. & Kim, J. 1990 Application of chaos theory to shear turbulence. In The Ubiquity of Chaos (ed. S. Krasner), pp. 56–63. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
King, G. P., Li, Y., Lee, W., Swinney, H. L. & Marcus, P. 1984 Wave speeds in wavy Taylor-vortex flow. J. Fluid Mech. 141, 365–390.Google Scholar
Ledrappier, F. 1981 Some relations between dimension and Lyapunov exponents. Commun. Math. Phys. 81, 229–238.Google Scholar
Marcus, P. 1984a Simulation of Taylor–Couette flow. Part 1. Numerical methods and comparison with experiment. J. Fluid Mech. 146, 45–64.Google Scholar
Marcus, P. 1984b Simulation of Taylor–Couette Flow. Part 2. Numerical results for wavy-vortex flow with one travelling wave. J. Fluid Mech. 146, 65–113.Google Scholar
Moser, R. D. & Moin, P. 1984 Direct numerical simulation of curved turbulent channel flow. NASA TM 85974.Google Scholar
Moser, R. D. & Moin, P. 1987 The effects of curvature in well-bounded turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 175, 479–510.Google Scholar
Moser, R. D., Moin, P. & Leonard, A. 1983 A spectral numerical method for the Navier–Stokes equations with applications to Taylor–Couette flow. J. Comput. Phys. 52, 524–544.Google Scholar
Newhouse, S., Ruelle, D. & Takens, F. 1978 Occurrence of strange Axiom A attractors near quasi-periodic flows on Tm, m 3. Commun. Math. Phys. 64, 35–40.Google Scholar
Oseledec, V. I. 1968 A multiplicative ergodic theorem. Lyapunov characteristic numbers for dynamical systems. Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. 19, 197.Google Scholar
Packard, N. H., Crutchfield, J. P., Farmer, J. D. & Shaw, R. S. 1980 Geometry from a time series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 712–716.Google Scholar
Ruelle, D. & Takens, F. 1971 On the nature of turbulence. Commun. Math. Phys. 20, 167–192.Google Scholar
Takens, F. 1981 Detecting strange attractors in turbulence In Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, Warwick 1980, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 898, pp. 366–381. Springer.
Taylor, G. I. 1923 Stability of a viscous liquid contained between two rotating cylinders. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 223, 289–343.Google Scholar
Wolf, A., Swift, J. B., Swinney, H. L. & Vastano, J. A. 1985 Determining Lyapunov exponents from a time series. Physica 16 D, 285–317.Google Scholar