Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:50:25.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shear flow over a translationally symmetric cylindrical bubble pinned on a slot in a plane wall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

James Q. Feng  and
Osman A. Basaran
James Q. Feng
Affiliation:
Chemical Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831–6224, USA Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
Osman A. Basaran
Affiliation:
Chemical Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831–6224, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Steady states of a translationally-symmetric cylindrical bubble protruding from a slot in a solid wall into a liquid undergoing a simple shear flow are investigated. Deformations of and the flow past the bubble are determined by solving the nonlinear free-boundary problem comprised of the two-dimensional Navier–Stokes system by the Galerkin/finite element method. Under conditions of creeping flow, the results of finite element computations are shown to agree well with asymptotic results. When the Reynolds number Re is finite, flow separates from the free surface and a recirculating eddy forms behind the bubble. The length of the separated eddy measured in the flow direction increases with Re, whereas its width is confined to within the region that lies between the supporting solid surface and the separation point at the free surface. By tracking solution branches in parameter space with an arc-length continuation method, curves of bubble deformation versus Reynolds number are found to exhibit turning points when Re reaches a critical value Rec. Therefore, along a family of bubble shapes, solutions do not exist when Re > Rec. The locations of turning points and the structure of flow fields are found to be governed virtually by a single parameter, We = Ca Re, where We and Ca are Weber and capillary numbers. Two markedly different modes of bubble deformation are identified at finite Re. One is dominant when Re is small and is tantamount to a plain skewing or tilting of the bubble in the downstream direction; the other becomes more pronounced when Re is large and corresponds to a pure upward stretching of the bubble tip.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 275 , 25 September 1994 , pp. 351 - 378
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, J. P. 1978 An efficient algorithm for the determination of certain bifurcation points. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 4, 19–27.Google Scholar
Acrivos, A. 1983 The breakup of small drops and bubbles in shear flows. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 404, 1–11.Google Scholar
Barthes, B. D. & Acrivos, A. 1973 Deformation and burst of a liquid droplet freely suspended in a linear shear field. J. Fluid Mech. 61, 1–21.Google Scholar
Basaran, O. A. 1992 Nonlinear oscillations of viscous liquid drops. J. Fluid Mech. 241, 169–198.Google Scholar
Brown, R. A. & Scriven, L. E. 1980 On the multiple equilibrium shapes and stability of an interface pinned on a slot. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 78, 528–542.Google Scholar
Chaffey, C. E. & Brenner, H. 1967 A second-order theory for shear deformation of drops. J. Colloid Sci. 24, 258–268.Google Scholar
Choi, S. J. & Schowalter, W. R. 1975 Rheological properties of nondilute suspensions of deformable particles. Phys. Fluids 18, 420–427.Google Scholar
Christodoulou, K. N. 1990 Computational physics of slide coating flow. PhD thesis. University of Minnesota Available from University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
Christodoulou, K. N. & Scriven, L. E. 1989 The fluid mechanics of slide coating. J. Fluid Mech. 208, 321–354.Google Scholar
Christodoulou, K. N. & Scriven, L. E. 1992 Discretization of free surface flows and other moving boundary problems. J. Comput. Phys. 99, 39–55.Google Scholar
Clift, R., Grace, J. R. & Weber, M. E. 1978 Bubbles, Drops and Particles. Academic.
Cox, R. G. 1969 The deformation of a drop in a general time-dependent fluid flow. J. Fluid Mech. 37, 601–623.Google Scholar
Dandy, D. S. & Leal, L. G. 1986 Boundary-layer separation from a smooth slip surface. Phys. Fluids 29 (5), 1360–1366.Google Scholar
Durbin, P. A. 1988a On the wind force needed to dislodge a drop adhered to a surface. J. Fluid Mech. 196, 205–222.Google Scholar
Durbin, P. A. 1988b Free-streamline analysis of deformation and dislodging by wind force of drops on a surface. Phys. Fluids 31 (1), 43–48.Google Scholar
Dussan, V., E. B. & Chow, R. T.-P. 1983 On the ability of drops or bubbles to stick to non-horizontal surfaces of solids. J. Fluid Mech. 137, 1–29.Google Scholar
Flumerfelt, R. W. 1980 Effects of dynamic interfacial properties on drop deformation and orientation in shear and extensional flow fields. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 76, 330–349.Google Scholar
Fornberg, B 1980 A numerical study of steady viscous flow past a circular cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 819–855.Google Scholar
Frankel, N. A. & Acrivos, A. 1970 The constitutive equation for a dilute emulsion. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 65–78.Google Scholar
Gibbs, J. W. 1906 The Scientific Papers of J. Willard Gibbs. Vol. I. Thermodynamics, p. 326. (Reprinted by Dover 1961.)
Hood, P. 1976 Frontal solution program for unsymmetric matrices. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Engng 10, 379–399 (and Correction, Intl J. Numer. Meth. Engng 11, (1977), 1055).Google Scholar
Huyakorn, P. S., Taylor, C., Lee, R. L. & Gresho, P. M. 1978 A comparison of various mixed interpolation finite elements in the velocity–pressure formulation of Navier–Stokes equations. Comput. Fluids 6, 25–35.Google Scholar
Iooss, G. & Joseph, D. D. 1990 Elementary Stability and Bifurcation Theory, 2nd edn. Springer.
Keller, H. B 1977 Numerical solution of bifurcation and nonlinear eigenvalue problems. In Applications of Bifurcation Theory (ed. P. Rabinowitz), pp. 359–384. Academic.
King, A. C. & Tuck, E. O. 1993 Thin liquid layers supported by steady air-flow surface traction. J. Fluid Mech. 251, 709–718.Google Scholar
Kistler, S. F. & Scriven, L. E. 1983 Coating flows. In Computational Analysis of Polymer Processing (ed. J. R. A. Pearson & S. M. Richardson), pp. 243–299. Applied Science.
Kistler, S. F. & Scriven, L. E. 1994 The teapot effect: sheet-forming flows with deflection, wetting and hysteresis. J. Fluid Mech. 263, 19–62.Google Scholar
Leal, L. G. 1989 Vorticity transport and wake structure for bluff bodies at finite Reynolds number. Phys. Fluids A 1, 124–131.Google Scholar
Lee, R. L., Gresho, P. M. & Sani, R. L. 1979 Smoothing techniques for certain primitive variable solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations. Intl. J. Numer. Meth. Engng 14, 1785–1804.Google Scholar
Mason, G. 1970 An experimental determination of the stable length of cylindrical liquid bridges. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 32, 172–176.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1964 Viscous and resistive eddies near a sharp corner. J. Fluid Mech. 18, 1–18.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. F., Huh, C. & Mason, S. G. 1977 Resistance to spreading of liquids by sharp edges. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 59, 568–581.Google Scholar
Ortega, J. M. & Rheinboldt, W. C. 1970 Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables. Academic.
Philips, W. J., Graves, R. W. & Flumerfelt, R. W. 1980 Experimental studies of drop dynamics in shear fields: role of dynamic interfacial effects. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 76, 350–370.Google Scholar
Pozrikidis, C. 1992 Boundary Integral and Singularity Methods for Linearized Viscous Flow. Cambridge University Press.
Rallison, J. M. 1984 The deformation of small viscous drops and bubbles in shear flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16, 45–66.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord 1879 On the capillary phenomena of jets. -Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 19, 71–97.Google Scholar
Reiner, M. 1956 The teapot effect. Phys. Today 9, 16–20.Google Scholar
Riks, E. 1972 Application of Newton's method to the problem of elastic stability. J. Appl. Mech. 39, 1060–1065.Google Scholar
Richardson, S. 1968 Two-dimensional bubbles in slow viscous flows. J. Fluid Mech. 33, 476–493.Google Scholar
Rumscheidt, F. D. & Mason, S. G. 1961 Particle motions in sheared suspensions. XII. Deformation and burst of fluid drops in shear and hyperbolic flow. J. Colloid Sci. 16, 238–261.Google Scholar
Ryskin, G. & Leal, L. G. 1984 Numerical solution of free-boundary problems in fluid mechanics. Part 2. Buoyancy-driven motion of a gas bubble through a quiescent liquid. J. Fluid Mech. 148, 19–35.Google Scholar
Santos, J. M. De 1991 Two-phase cocurrent downflow through constricted passages. PhD thesis. University of Minnesota. Available from University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
Strang, G. & Fix, G. J. 1973 An Analysis of the Finite Element Method. Prentice-Hall.
Taylor, G. I. 1934 The formation of emulsions in definable fields of flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 146, 501–523.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. F., Warsi, Z. U. A. & Mastin, W. C. 1985 Numerical Grid Generation. Elsevier.
Ungar, L. H. & Brown, R. A. 1982 The dependence of the shape and stability of captive rotating drops on multiple parameters. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 306, 347–370.Google Scholar
Walters, R. A. 1980 The frontal method in hydrodynamics simulations. Comput Fluids 8, 265–272.Google Scholar
Wei, L., Schmidt, W. & Slattery, J. C. 1974 Measurement of the surface dilatational viscosity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 48, 1–8.Google Scholar
Zahalak, G. I., Rao, P. R. & Sutera, S. P. 1987 Large deformations of a cylindrical liquid-filled membrane by a viscous shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 179, 283–305.Google Scholar