Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-rj9fg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-10T14:39:41.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-conditioned fields for large-eddy simulations of turbulent flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2010

STEPHEN B. POPE
STEPHEN B. POPE*
Affiliation:
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An alternative foundation is developed for the large-eddy simulation (LES) of turbulent flows. It is based on ‘self-conditioned fields’, for example, the mean velocity field conditional on a discrete representation of the filtered velocity field. It is shown that the self-conditioned velocity field minimizes the residual kinetic energy, and that, with the ideal model, the method yields the correct one-time behaviour as determined by the Navier–Stokes equations. The approach is extended to the self-conditioned probability density function (PDF) of compositions. Compared to LES formulations based on the filtered velocity and the filtered density function, the self-conditioned field approach has several advantages: for laminar flow, and in the direct-numerical-simulation limit, the residual fluctuations are zero or exponentially small; full account is taken of the probability distribution of turbulent fields; there are no commutation issues; and there are no issues with filtering at walls, where the self-conditioned velocity is zero. The exact evolution equations for the self-conditioned velocity and composition PDF are derived. Basic models are presented, and the development of improved models is discussed.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 652 , 10 June 2010 , pp. 139 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Adrian, R. J. 1990 Stochastic estimation of subgrid scale motions. Appl. Mech. Rev. 43, S214–S218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazilevs, Y., Calo, V. M., Cottrel, J. A., Hughes, T. J. R., Reali, A. & Scovazzi, G. 2007 Variational multiscale residual-based turbulence modelling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engng 197, 173–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boris, J. P., Grinstein, F. F., Oran, E. S. & Kolbe, R. L. 1992 New insights into large eddy simulation. Fluid Dyn. Res. 10, 199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colucci, P. J., Jaberi, F. A., Givi, P. & Pope, S. B. 1998 Filtered density function for large eddy simulation of turbulent reacting flows. Phys. Fluids 10, 499–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foias, C., Manley, O., Roa, R. & Temam, R. 2001 Navier–Stokes Equations and Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, R. O. 2003 Computational Models for Turbulent Reactive Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, F. & O'Brien, E. E. 1993 A large-eddy simulation scheme for turbulent reacting flows. Phys. Fluids A 5, 1282–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P. & Cabot, W. H. 1991 A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids A 3 (7), 1760–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstein, F. F., Margolin, L. G. & Rider, W. J. 2007 Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, P., Lumley, J. L. & Berkooz, G. 1996 Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems, and Symmetry. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimenko, A. Y. & Bilger, R. W. 1999 Conditional moment closure for turbulent combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 25, 595–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, J. A. & Moser, R. D. 1999 Optimal LES formulations for isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 398, 321–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesieur, M., Métais, O. & Comte, P. 2005 Large-Eddy Simulations of Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilly, D. K. 1967 The representation of small-scale turbulence in numerical simulation experiments. In Proceedings of the IBM Scientific Computing Symposium on Environmental Sciences (ed. Goldstine, H. H.), pp. 195–210. IBM Data Processing Division.Google Scholar
McComb, W. D., Hunter, A. & Johnston, C. 2001 Conditional mode-elimination and subgrid-modelling problem for isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 13, 2030–2044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meneveau, C., Lund, T. S. & Cabot, W. H. 1996 A Lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 319, 353–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 1985 PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 11, 119–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 1990 Computations of turbulent combustion: progress and challenges. Proc. Combust. Inst. 23, 591–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2001 Large-eddy simulation using projection onto local basis functions. In Fluid Mechanics and the Environment: Dynamical Approaches (ed. Lumley, J. L.), pp. 239–265. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raman, V. & Pitsch, H. 2007 A consistent LES/filtered-density function formulation for the simulation of turbulent flames with detailed chemistry. Proc. Combust. Inst. 31, 1711–1719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogallo, R. S. & Moin, P. 1985 Numerical simulation of turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 17, 99–137.Google Scholar
Sagaut, P. 2001 Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, U. 1975 Subgrid scale model for finite difference simulations of turbulent flows in plane channels and annuli. J. Comput. Phys. 18, 376–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temam, R. 1991 Approximation of attractors, large eddies simulation and multi-scale methods. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 434, 23–29.Google Scholar
Wang, D., Tong, C. & Pope, S. B. 2004 Experimental study of velocity filtered joint density function for large eddy simulation. Phys. Fluids 16, 3599–3613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar