Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:44:05.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phase-space dynamics of opposition control in wall-bounded turbulent flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2018

Joseph I. Ibrahim Open the ORCID record for Joseph I. Ibrahim [Opens in a new window] ,
Qiang Yang ,
Patrick Doohan Open the ORCID record for Patrick Doohan [Opens in a new window]  and
Yongyun Hwang Open the ORCID record for Yongyun Hwang [Opens in a new window]
Joseph I. Ibrahim
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
Qiang Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Patrick Doohan
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Yongyun Hwang*
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London SW7 2AZ, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigate the nonlinear phase-space dynamics of plane Couette flow and plane Poiseuille flow under the action of opposition control at low Reynolds numbers in domains close to the minimal unit. In Couette flow, the effect of the control is analysed by focussing on a pair of non-trivial equilibrium solutions. It is found that the control only slightly modifies the statistics, turbulent skin friction and phase-space projection of the lower-branch equilibrium solution, which, in this case, is in fact identical to the edge state. On the other hand, the upper-branch equilibrium solution and mean turbulent state are modified considerably when the control is applied. In phase space, they gradually approach the lower-branch equilibrium solution on increasing the control amplitude, and this results in an elevation of the critical Reynolds number at which the equilibrium solutions first occur via a saddle-node bifurcation. It is also found that the upper-branch equilibrium solution is stabilised by the control. In Poiseuille flow, we study an unstable periodic orbit on the edge state and find that it, too, is modified very little by opposition control. We again observe that the turbulent state gradually approaches the edge state in phase space as the control amplitude is increased. In both flows, we find that the control significantly reduces the fluctuating strength of the turbulent state in phase space. However, the reduced distance between the turbulent trajectory and the edge state yields a significant reduction in turbulence lifetimes for both Couette and Poiseuille flow. This demonstrates that opposition control greatly increases the probability of the trajectory escaping from the turbulent state, which takes the form of a chaotic saddle.

JFM classification

Nonlinear Dynamical Systems: Nonlinear Dynamical Systems Turbulent Flows: Turbulence control Turbulent Flows: Turbulent boundary layers
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 861 , 25 February 2019 , pp. 29 - 54
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bewley, T. R. 2014 Numerical Renaissance: Simulation, Optimisation and Control. Renaissance Press.Google Scholar
Cantwell, B. J. 1981 Organized motion in turbulent flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 13, 457–515.Google Scholar
Cassinelli, A., de Giovanetti, M. & Hwang, Y. 2017 Streak instability in near-wall turbulence revisited. J. Turbul. 18 (5), 443–464.Google Scholar
Choi, H., Moin, P. & Kim, J. 1994 Active turbulence control for drag reduction in wall-bounded flows. J. Fluid Mech. 262, 75–110.Google Scholar
Chung, Y. M. & Talha, T. 2011 Effectiveness of active flow control for turbulent skin friction drag reduction. Phys. Fluids 23, 025102.Google Scholar
Eckhardt, B., Schneider, T. M., Hof, B. & Westerweel, J. 2007 Turbulence transition in pipe flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 39, 447–468.Google Scholar
Faisst, H. & Eckhardt, B. 2003 Traveling waves in pipe flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 224502.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. F., Halcrow, J. & Cvitanović, P. 2008 Visualizing the geometry of state space in plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 611, 107–130.Google Scholar
de Giovanetti, M., Hwang, Y. & Choi, H. 2016 Skin-friction generation by attached eddies in turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 808, 511–538.Google Scholar
Halcrow, J., Gibson, J. F., Cvitanović, P. & Viswanath, D. 2009 Heteroclinic connections in plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 621, 365–376.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. M., Kim, J. & Waleffe, F. 1995 Regeneration mechanisms of near-wall turbulence structures. J. Fluid Mech. 287, 317–348.Google Scholar
Hwang, Y. 2013 Near-wall turbulent fluctuations in the absence of wide outer motions. J. Fluid Mech. 723, 268–288.Google Scholar
Hwang, Y. 2015 Statistical structure of self-sustaining attached eddies in turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 767, 254–289.Google Scholar
Hwang, Y. & Bengana, Y. 2016 Self-sustaining process of minimal attached eddies in turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 795, 708–738.Google Scholar
Hwang, Y., Willis, A. P. & Cossu, C. 2016 Invariant solutions of minimal large-scale structures in turbulent channel flow for Re 𝜏 up to 1000. J. Fluid Mech. 802, R1.Google Scholar
Itano, T. & Toh, S. 2001 The dynamics of bursting process in wall turbulence. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 70, 703–716.Google Scholar
Jiménez, J. & Moin, P. 1991 Minimal flow unit in near-wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 225, 213–240.Google Scholar
Kawahara, G. 2005 Laminarization of minimal plane Couette flow: going beyond the basin of attraction of turbulence. Phys. Fluids 17, 041702.Google Scholar
Kawahara, G. & Kida, S. 2001 Periodic motion embedded in plane Couette turbulence: regeneration cycle and burst. J. Fluid Mech. 449, 291–300.Google Scholar
Kawahara, G., Uhlmann, M. & van Veen, L. 2012 The significance of simple invariant solutions in turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 44, 203–225.Google Scholar
Kim, J., Moin, P. & Moser, R. 1987 Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133–166.Google Scholar
Kline, S. J., Reynolds, W. C., Schraub, F. A. & Runstadler, P. W. 1967 The structure of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 741–773.Google Scholar
Kreilos, T. & Eckhardt, B. 2012 Periodic orbits near onset of chaos in plane Couette flow. Chaos 22 (4), 047505.Google Scholar
Kreilos, T., Veble, G., Schneider, T. M. & Eckhardt, B. 2013 Edge states for the turbulence transition in the asymptotic suction boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 726, 100–122.Google Scholar
Lessen, M., Sadler, S. G. & Liu, T. Y. 1968 Stability of pipe Poiseuille flow. Phys. Fluids 11, 1404–1409.Google Scholar
Li, W. & Graham, M. D. 2007 Polymer induced drag reduction in exact coherent structures of plane Poiseuille flow. Phys. Fluids 19, 083101.Google Scholar
Li, W., Xi, L. & Graham, M. D. 2006 Nonlinear travelling waves as a framework for understanding turbulent drag reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 565, 353–362.Google Scholar
Lim, J. & Kim, J. 2004 A singular value analysis of boundary layer control. Phys. Fluids 16, 1980.Google Scholar
Luhar, M., Sharma, A. S. & Mckeon, B. J. 2014 Opposition control within the resolvent analysis framework. J. Fluid Mech. 749, 597–626.Google Scholar
Nagata, M. 1990 Three-dimensional finite-amplitude solutions in plane Couette flow: bifurcation from infinity. J. Fluid Mech. 217, 519–527.Google Scholar
Neelavara, S. A., Duguet, Y. & Lusseyran, F. 2017 State space analysis of minimal channel flow. Fluid Dyn. Res. 49, 035511.Google Scholar
Orszag, S. A. 1971 Accurate solution of the Orr–Sommerfeld stability equation. J. Fluid Mech. 50, 689–703.Google Scholar
Park, J. S. & Graham, M. D. 2015 Exact coherent states and connections to turbulent dynamics in minimal channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 782, 430–454.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. K. 1991 Coherent motions in the turburlent boundary layer. Annu. Rev. Fluid. Mech. 23, 601–639.Google Scholar
Romanov, V. A. 1973 Stability of plane-parallel Couette flow. Funct. Anal. & Applics. 7, 137–146.Google Scholar
Schneider, T. M., Eckhardt, B. & Yorke, J. A. 2007 Turbulence transition and the edge of chaos in pipe flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 034502.Google Scholar
Schneider, T. M., Gibson, J. F., Lagha, M., de Lillo, F. & Eckhardt, B. 2008 Laminar-turbulent boundary in plane Couette flow. Phys. Rev. E 78, 037301.Google Scholar
Schoppa, W. & Hussain, F. 2002 Coherent structure generation in near-wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 453, 57–108.Google Scholar
Skufca, J. D., Yorke, J. A. & Eckhardt, B. 2006 Edge of chaos in a parallel shear flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 174101.Google Scholar
Stone, P. A., Waleffe, F. & Graham, M. D. 2002 Toward a structural understanding of turbulent drag reduction: nonlinear coherent states in viscoelastic shear flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 208301.Google Scholar
Viswanath, D. 2007 Recurrent motions within plane Couette turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 580, 339–358.Google Scholar
Viswanath, D. 2009 The critical layeer in pipe flow at high Reynolds number. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 367, 561–576.Google Scholar
Waleffe, F. 1997 On a self-sustaining process in shear flows. Phys. Fluids 9, 883–900.Google Scholar
Waleffe, F. 1998 Three-dimensional coherent states in plane shear flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4140.Google Scholar
Waleffe, F. 2001 Exact coherent structures in channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 435, 93–102.Google Scholar
Waleffe, F. 2003 Homotopy of exact coherent structures in plane shear flows. Phys. Fluids 15, 1517–1534.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Gibson, J. & Waleffe, F. 2007 Lower branch coherent states in shear flows: transition and control. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 204501.Google Scholar
Wedin, H. & Kerswell, R. R. 2004 Exact coherent structures in pipe flow: travelling wave solutions. J. Fluid Mech. 508, 333–371.Google Scholar
Willis, A. P., Cvitanović, P. & Avila, M. 2013 Revealing the state space of turbulent pipe flow by symmetry reduction. J. Fluid Mech. 721, 514–540.Google Scholar
Xi, L. & Bai, X. 2016 Marginal turbulent state of viscoelastic fluids: a polymer drag reduction perspective. Phys. Rev. E 93, 043118.Google Scholar
Xi, L. & Graham, M. D. 2012 Dynamics on the laminar-turbulent boundary and the origin of the maximum drag reduction asymptote. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 028301.Google Scholar
Zammert, S. & Eckhardt, B. 2014 Periodically bursting edge states in plane Poiseuille flow. Fluid Dyn. Res. 46, 041419.Google Scholar