Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:19:14.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the stability of flow in an elliptic pipe which is nearly circular

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

A. Davey  and
H. Salwen
A. Davey
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
H. Salwen
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Engineering Physics, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an earlier paper (Davey 1978) the first author investigated the linear stability of flow in a straight pipe whose cross-section was an ellipse, of small ellipticity e, by regarding the flow as a perturbation of Poiseuille flow in a circular pipe. That paper contained some serious errors which we correct herein. We show analytically that for the most important mode n = 1, for which the circular problem has a double eigenvalue c0 as the ‘swirl’ can be in either direction, the ellipticity splits the double eigenvalue into two separate eigenvalues c0 ± e2c12, to leading order, when the cross-sectional area of the pipe is kept fixed. The imaginary part of c12 is non-zero and so the ellipticity always makes the flow less stable. This specific problem is generic to a much wider class of fluid dynamical problems which are made less stable when the symmetry group of the dynamical system is reduced from S1 to Z2.

In the Appendix, P. G. Drazin describes simply the qualitative structure of this problem, and other problems with the same symmetries, without technical detail.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 281 , 25 December 1994 , pp. 357 - 369
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

With an appendix by P. G. Drazin

References

Batchelor, G. K. & Gill, A. E. 1962 J. Fluid Mech. 14, 529.
Davey, A. 1978 J. Fluid Mech. 87, 233 (referred to herein as D).
Gill, A. E. 1973 J. Fluid Mech. 61, 97.
Guckenheimer, J. & Mahalov, A. 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2257.
Hocking, L. M. 1977 Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 30, 343.
Lessen, M., Sadler, S. G. & Liu, T.-Y. 1968 Phys. Fluids 11, 1404.
Moore, D. W. & Saffman, P. G. 1975 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 346, 413.
Salwen, H. & Grosch, C. E. 1972 J. Fluid Mech. 54, 93.
Schiff, L. I. 1968 Quantum Mechanics, 3rd Edn. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha.
Stuart, J. T. & DiPrima, R. C. 1978 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 362, 27.
Tatsumi, T. & Yoshimura, T. 1990 J. Fluid Mech. 212, 437.