Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:58:36.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the physical mechanism of front–back asymmetry of non-breaking gravity–capillary waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2020

Alexander Dosaev Open the ORCID record for Alexander Dosaev [Opens in a new window] ,
Yuliya I. Troitskaya Open the ORCID record for Yuliya I. Troitskaya [Opens in a new window]  and
Victor I. Shrira Open the ORCID record for Victor I. Shrira [Opens in a new window]
Alexander Dosaev
Affiliation:
Department of Nonlinear Geophysical Processes, Institute of Applied Physics, 46 Ulyanov Street, Nizhny Novgorod603950, Russia
Yuliya I. Troitskaya
Affiliation:
Department of Nonlinear Geophysical Processes, Institute of Applied Physics, 46 Ulyanov Street, Nizhny Novgorod603950, Russia
Victor I. Shrira*
Affiliation:
School of Computing and Mathematics, Keele University, KeeleST5 5BG, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In nature, the wind waves of the gravity–capillary range are noticeably skewed forward. The salient feature of such waves is a characteristic pattern of capillary ripples on their crests. The train of these ‘parasitic capillaries’ is not symmetric with respect to the crest, it is localised on the front slope and decays towards the trough. Although understanding the gravity–capillary waves front–back asymmetry is important for remote sensing and, potentially, for wave–wind interaction, the physical mechanisms causing this asymmetry have not been identified. Here, we address this gap by extensive numerical simulations of the Euler equations employing the method of conformal mapping for two-dimensional potential flow and taking into account wave generation by wind and dissipation due to molecular viscosity. On examining the role of various factors contributing to the wave profile front–back asymmetry: wind forcing, viscous stresses and the Reynolds stresses caused by ripples, we found, in the absence of wave breaking, the latter to be by far the most important. It is the lopsided ripple distribution which leads to the noticeable fore–aft asymmetry of the mean wave profile. We also found how the asymmetry depends on wavelength, steepness, wind, viscosity and surface tension. The results of the model are discussed in the context of the available experimental data on asymmetry of gravity–capillary waves in both the breaking and non-breaking regimes. A reasonable agreement of the model with the data has been found for the regime without breaking or microbreaking.

JFM classification

Geophysical and Geological Flows: Air/sea interactions Waves/Free-surface Flows: Capillary waves Waves/Free-surface Flows: Wind-wave interactions
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 906 , 10 January 2021 , A11
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agnon, Y., Babanin, A. V., Young, I. R. & Chalikov, D. 2005 Fine scale inhomogeneity of wind-wave energy input, skewness, and asymmetry. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32 (12), L12603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvarez-Borrego, J. & Martin-Atienza, B. 2013 Some statistical properties of surface slopes via remote sensing using variable reflection angle considering a non-gaussian probability density function. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 10 (2), 246–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babanin, A. V., Chalikov, D., Young, I. R. & Savelyev, I. 2010 Numerical and laboratory investigation of breaking of steep two-dimensional waves in deep water. J. Fluid Mech. 644, 433–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, R. J., Jones, I. S. F. & Toba, Y. 1991 The steepness and shape of wind waves. J. Oceanogra. Soc. Japan 47 (6), 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banner, M. L., Barthelemy, X., Fedele, F., Allis, M., Benetazzo, A., Dias, F. & Peirson, W. L. 2014 Linking reduced breaking crest speeds to unsteady nonlinear water wave group behavior. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (11), 114502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caulliez, G. 2013 Dissipation regimes for short wind waves. J. Geophys. Res. 118 (2), 672–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caulliez, G. & Collard, F. 1999 Three-dimensional evolution of wind waves from gravity-capillary to short gravity range. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 18 (3), 389–402. Three-dimensional aspects of air-sea interaction.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caulliez, G. & Guérin, C.-A. 2012 Higher-order statistical analysis of short wind wave fields. J. Geophys. Res. 117, C06002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapron, B., Kerbaol, V., Vandemark, D. & Elfouhaily, T. 2000 Importance of peakedness in sea surface slope measurements and applications. J. Geophys. Res. 105 (C7), 17195–17202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapron, B., Vandemark, D. & Elfouhaily, T. 2002 On the skewness of the sea slope probability distribution. Gas Transfer Water Surf. 127, 59–63.Google Scholar
Cox, C. & Munk, W. 1954 Measurement of the roughness of the sea surface from photographs of the sun's glitter. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 44 (11), 838–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C. & Munk, W. 1956 Slopes of the sea surface deduced from photographs of sun glitter. Bull. Scripps Inst. Oceanogr. 6 (9), 401–488.Google Scholar
Csanady, G. T. 1985 Air-sea momentum transfer by means of short-crested wavelets. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 15 (11), 1486–1501.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, J. H. 2001 Spilling breakers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 33 (1), 519–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgar, S. 1987 Relationships involving third moments and bispectra of a harmonic process. IEEE Trans. Acoust. 35 (12), 1725–1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgar, S. & Guza, R. T. 1985 Observations of bispectra of shoaling surface gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 161, 425–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorov, A. V. & Melville, W. K. 1998 Nonlinear gravity–capillary waves with forcing and dissipation. J. Fluid Mech. 354, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorov, A. V. & Melville, W. K. 2009 A model of strongly forced wind waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 39 (10), 2502–2522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hung, L.-P. & Tsai, W.-T. 2009 The formation of parasitic capillary ripples on gravity-capillary waves and the underlying vortical structures. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 39 (2), 263–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, P. A. E. M. 2009 On some consequences of the canonical transformation in the Hamiltonian theory of water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 637, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, H. 1925 On the formation of water waves by wind. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 107 (742), 189–206.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1975 Hydrodynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leykin, I. A., Donelan, M. A., Mellen, R. H. & McLaughlin, D. J. 1995 Asymmetry of wind waves studied in a laboratory tank. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 2 (3/4), 280–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Yan, X.-H., Liu, W. T. & Hwang, P. A. 1997 The probability density function of ocean surface slopes and its effects on radar backscatter. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 27 (5), 782–797.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1953 Mass transport in water waves. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 245 (903), 535–581.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1982 On the skewness of sea-surface slopes. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 12 (11), 1283–1291.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1992 Theory of weakly damped stokes waves: a new formulation and its physical interpretation. J. Fluid Mech. 235, 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1995 Parasitic capillary waves: a direct calculation. J. Fluid Mech. 301, 79–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masuda, A. & Kuo, Y.-Y. 1981 A note on the imaginary part of bispectra. Deep Sea Res. A 28 (3), 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munk, W. H. 1955 High frequency spectrum of ocean waves. J. Mar. Res. 14 (4), 302–314.Google Scholar
Munk, W. 2009 An inconvenient sea truth: Spread, steepness, and skewness of surface slopes. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1, 377–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mysak, L. A. & LeBlond, P. H. 1978 Waves in the Ocean. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1966 The Dynamics of the Upper Ocean. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plant, W. J. 1982 A relationship between wind stress and wave slope. J. Geophys. Res. 87 (C3), 1961–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruvinsky, K. D., Feldstein, F. I. & Freidman, G. I. 1991 Numerical simulations of the quasi-stationary stage of ripple excitation by steep gravity–capillary waves. J. Fluid Mech. 230, 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slunyaev, A. V. & Shrira, V. I. 2013 On the highest non-breaking wave in a group: fully nonlinear water wave breathers versus weakly nonlinear theory. J. Fluid Mech. 735, 203–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troitskaya, Y., Kandaurov, A., Ermakova, O., Kozlov, D., Sergeev, D. & Zilitinkevich, S. 2018 The “bag breakup” spume droplet generation mechanism at high winds. Part I: spray generation function. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 48 (9), 2167–2188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, G. R. 1978 Theories for the interaction of electromagnetic and oceanic waves–a review. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 13 (1-4), 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakharov, V. E., Dyachenko, A. I. & Vasilyev, O. A. 2002 New method for numerical simulation of a nonstationary potential flow of incompressible fluid with a free surface. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 21 (3), 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zavadsky, A. & Shemer, L. 2017 Investigation of statistical parameters of the evolving wind wave field using a laser slope gauge. Phys. Fluids 29 (5), 056602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dosaev et al. supplementary movie

See pdf file for movie caption

Download Dosaev et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 5.3 MB
Supplementary material: PDF

Dosaev et al. supplementary material

Caption for Movie 1
Download Dosaev et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 13.6 KB