Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:01:17.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On a uniformly valid analytical rectilinear cascade response function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2010

HELENE POSSON ,
M. ROGER  and
S. MOREAU
HELENE POSSON*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides et Acoustique, École Centrale de Lyon, 69134 Écully CEDEX, France
M. ROGER
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides et Acoustique, École Centrale de Lyon, 69134 Écully CEDEX, France
S. MOREAU
Affiliation:
G.A.U.S., Mechanical Engineering Department, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, CanadaJ1K 2R1
*
†Present address: G.A.U.S., Mechanical Engineering Department, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, CanadaJ1K 2R1. Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper extends an existing analytical model of the aeroacoustic response of a rectilinear cascade of flat-plate blades to three-dimensional incident vortical gusts, by providing closed-form expressions for the acoustic field inside the inter-blade channels, as well as for the pressure jump over the blades in subsonic flows. The extended formulation is dedicated to future implementation in a fan-broadband-noise-prediction tool. The intended applications include the modern turbofan engines, for which analytical modelling is believed to be a good alternative to more expensive numerical techniques. The initial model taken as a reference is based on the Wiener–Hopf technique. An analytical solution valid over the whole space is first derived by making an extensive use of the residue theorem. The accuracy of the model is shown by comparing with numerical predictions of benchmark configurations available in the literature. This full exact solution could be used as a reference for future assessment of numerical solvers, of linearized Euler equations for instance, in rectilinear or narrow-annulus configurations. In addition, the pressure jump is a key piece of information because it can be used as a source term in an acoustic analogy when the rectilinear-cascade model is applied to three-dimensional blade rows by resorting to a strip-theory approach. When used as such in a true rectilinear-cascade configuration, it reproduces the exact radiated field that can be derived directly. The solution is also compared to a classical single-airfoil formulation to highlight the cascade effect. This effect is found important when the blades of the cascade overlap significantly, but the cascade solution tends to the single-airfoil one as the overlap goes to zero. This suggests that both models can be used as the continuation of each other if needed.

JFM classification

Acoustics: Aeroacoustics
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 663 , 25 November 2010 , pp. 22 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amiet, R. K. 1974 Compressibility effects in unsteady thin-airfoil theory. AIAA J. 12, 253–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amiet, R. K. 1975 Effects of compressibility in unsteady airfoil lift theories. In University of Arizona/AFOSR Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics, Tucson, AZ (ed. Kinney, R. B.). Arizona Board of Regents, Tucson.Google Scholar
Amiet, R. K. 1976 High frequency thin-airfoil theory for subsonic flow. AIAA J. 14, 1076–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atassi, H. M., Ali, A. A., Atassi, O. V. & Vinogradov, I. V. 2004 Scattering of incidence disturbances by an annular cascade in a swirling flow. J. Fluid Mech. 499, 111–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atassi, H. M. & Hamad, G. 1981 Sound generated in a cascade by three-dimensional disturbances convected in subsonic flow. In 7th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Atassi, H. M. & Logue, M. M. 2008 Effect of turbulence structure on broadband fan noise. In 14th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Atassi, H. M. & Vinogradov, I. V. 2005 A model for fan broadband interaction noise in nonuniform flow. In 11th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, Monterey, CA, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Atassi, H. M. & Vinogradov, I. V. 2007 Modelling broadband fan noise and comparison with experiments. In 13th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, Rome, Italy, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Boquilion, O., Glegg, S. A. L., Devenport, W. J. & Larsan, J. 2003 The interaction of large scale turbulence with a cascade of flat plates. In 9th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, Hilton Head, SC, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Cheong, C., Joseph, P. & Soogab, L. 2006 High-frequency formulation for the acoustic power spectrum due to cascade–turbulence interaction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119 (1), 108–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elhadidi, B. & Atassi, H. M. 2002 High frequency sound radiation from an annular cascade in swirling flows. In 8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, Breckenridge, CO, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Evers, I. & Peake, N. 2002 On sound generation by the interaction between turbulence and a cascade of airfoils with non-uniform mean flow. J. Fluid Mech. 463, 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, J. & Atassi, H. M. 1993 Compressible flows with vortical disturbances around a cascade of loaded airfoils. In Unsteady Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics, and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines and Propellers, pp. 149–176. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ffowcs-Williams, J. E. & Hawkings, D. L. 1969 Sound generation by turbulence and surfaces in arbitrary motion. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 264, 321–342.Google Scholar
Ganz, U. W., Joppa, P. D., Patten, T. J. & Scharpf, D. F. 1998 Boeing 18-inch fan rig broadband noise test. Contractor Rep. CR-1998-208704. NASA.Google Scholar
Glegg, S. A. L. 1999 The response of a swept blade row to a three-dimensional gust. J. Sound Vib. 227 (1), 29–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. 1976 Aeroacoustics. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Golubev, V. V. & Atassi, H. M. 2000 Unsteady swirling flows in annular cascades, Part 2: Aerodynamic blade response incident disturbance. AIAA J. 38 (7), 1150–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J. M. R. 1970 Similarity rules for thin aerofoils in non-stationary subsonic flows. J. Fluid Mech. 43 (4), 753–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grissom, D. L., Devenport, W. J. & Glegg, S. A. L. 2005 Measurements of a discrete upwash gust passing through a linear flat plate cascade, and comparisons with linearized theory. In 11th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, Monterey, CA, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Hall, K. C. & Verdon, J. M. 1991 Gust response analysis for cascades operating in nonuniform mean flows. AIAA J. 29 (9), 1463–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, D. B. 1974 The spectrum of rotor noise caused by atmospheric turbulence. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 56 (1), 110–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, D. B. 1994 Coupled 2-dimensional cascade theory for noise and unsteady aerodynamics of blade row interaction in turbofans. Vol. I. Theory development and parametric studies. Contractor Rep. CR-4506. NASA.Google Scholar
Hanson, D. B. 1999 Acoustic reflexion and transmission of 2-dimensional rotors and stators, including mode and frequency scattering effects. Contractor Rep. CR-1999-208880. NASA.Google Scholar
Hardin, J. C., Huff, D. & Tam, C. K. 2000 Benchmark problems. In Third Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA) Workshop on Benchmark Problems (ed. Dahl, M. D.), pp. 1–22. NASA Glenn Research Center.Google Scholar
Kaji, S. & Okazaki, T. 1970 a Generation of sound by rotor–stator interaction. J. Sound Vib. 13, 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaji, S. & Okazaki, T. 1970 b Propagation of sound waves through a blade row, II. Analysis based on the acceleration potential method. J. Sound Vib. 11 (3), 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Kármán, Th. & Sears, W. R. 1938 Airfoil theory for nonuniform motion. J. Aero. Sci. 5 (10), 379–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, W. 1971 On transmission of sound through a blade row. J. Sound Vib. 18 (1), 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kodama, H. & Namba, M. 1990 Unsteady lifting surface theory for a rotating cascade of swept blades. J. Turbomach. 112, 411–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landahl, L. 1961 Unsteady Transonic Flow. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, A. E. D. & Peake, N. 2008 Rotor–stator broadband noise prediction. In 14th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, Vancouver, Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockard, D. P. 2000 An efficient, two-dimensional implementation of the Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings equation. J. Sound Vib. 229 (4), 897–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majumdar, S. J. & Peake, N. 1996 Three-dimensional effects in cascade–gust interaction. Wave Motion 23, 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, R. & Horvay, G. 1970 Sound transmission through blade rows. J. Sound Vib. 12 (1), 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Namba, M. 1987 Three-dimensional flows. In Manual of Aeroelasticity in Axial Flow Turbomachinery (ed. Platzer, M. F. & Carta, F. O.), vol. 1, Unsteady Turbomachinery Aerodynamics, chap. 4. Neuilly sur Seine, France: AGARD.Google Scholar
Namba, M. & Schulten, J. B. H. M. 2000 Category 4 – fan stator with harmonic excitation by rotor wake. In Third Computational Aeroacoustics (CAA) Workshop on Benchmark Problems (ed. Hardin, J. C., Huff, D. & Tam, C. K.), pp. 73–86.Google Scholar
Paterson, R. W. & Amiet, R. K. 1979 Noise of a model helicopter rotor due to ingestion of turbulence. Contractor Rep. CR-3213. NASA.Google Scholar
Peake, N. 1992 The interaction between a high-frequency gust and a blade row. J. Fluid Mech. 241, 261–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peake, N. 1993 The scattering of vorticity waves by an infinite cascade of flat plates in subsonic flow. Wave Motion 18, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peake, N. 2004 On application of high-frequency asymptotics in aeroacoustics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 362, 673–696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peake, N. & Kerschen, E. J. 1995 A uniform asymptotic approximation of high-frequency unsteady cascade flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 449, 177–186.Google Scholar
Possio, C. 1938 L'azione aerodinamica sul profilo oscillante in un fluido compressible a velocita ipsonora. L'Aerotecnica 18 (4), 441–459.Google Scholar
Posson, H. 2008 Fonctions de réponse de grille d'aubes et effet d'écran pour le bruit à large bande des soufflantes. PhD thesis, Ecole Centrale de Lyon.Google Scholar
Posson, H., Moreau, S. & Roger, M. 2010 On the use of a uniformly valid analytical cascade response function for broadband noise predictions. J. Sound Vib. 329 (18), 3721–3743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posson, H. & Roger, M. 2007 Parametric study of gust scattering and sound transmission through a blade row. In 13th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, Rome, Italy, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Prasad, D. & Verdon, J. M. 2002 A three-dimensional linearized Euler analysis of classical wake/stator interactions: validation and unsteady response predictions. Aeroacoustics 1 (2), 137–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravindranath, A. & Lakshminarayana, B. 1980 Three dimensional mean flow and turbulence characteristics of the near wake of the compressor rotor blade. Contractor Rep. 159518 PSU Turbo R 80-4. NASA.Google Scholar
Reissner, E. 1951 On the application of mathieu functions in the theory of subsonic compressible flow past oscillating airfoils. Tech. Rep. TN 2363. NACA.Google Scholar
Schulten, J. B. H. M. 1982 Sound generated by rotor wakes interacting with a leaned vane stator. AIAA J. 20 (10), 1352–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulten, J. B. H. M. 1997 Vane sweep effects on rotor/stator interaction noise. AIAA J. 35, 945–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, W. R. 1941 Some aspects of non-stationary airfoil theory and its practical applications. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 8 (3), 104–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. N. 1973 Discrete frequency sound generation in axial flow turbomachines. Brit. Aero. Res. Counc. R &M 3709, 1–59.Google Scholar
Verdon, J. M. & Hall, K. C. 1990 Development of a linearized unsteady aerodynamic analysis for cascade gust response predictions. Contractor Rep. CR-4308. NASA.Google Scholar
Whitehead, D. S. 1972 Vibration and sound generation in a cascade of flat plates in subsonic flow. Tech. Rep. CUED/A-Turbo/TR 15. Cambridge University Engineering Laboratory.Google Scholar
Whitehead, D. S. 1987 Classical two-dimensional methods. In Manual of Aeroelasticity in Axial Flow Turbomachinery (ed. Platzer, M. F. & Carta, F. O.), vol. 1, Unsteady Turbomachinery Aerodynamics, chap. 3. Neuilly sur Seine, France: AGARD.Google Scholar