Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:06:25.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Oblique impact of microspheres on the surface of quiescent liquid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2020

Bingqiang Ji ,
Qiang Song Open the ORCID record for Qiang Song [Opens in a new window] ,
Kai Shi ,
Jiaheng Liu  and
Qiang Yao
Bingqiang Ji
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, PR China
Qiang Song*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, PR China
Kai Shi
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, PR China
Jiaheng Liu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, PR China
Qiang Yao
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, PR China
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Impact of microspheres on liquid surfaces is a universal phenomenon in nature and in industrial processes. However, most relevant studies have mainly focused on the sphere's vertical impact. Herein, we present the first observation on the oblique impact of microspheres on the surface of quiescent liquid using high-speed microphotography. The sphere motion and liquid surface distortion after the oblique impact are basically different from those after a vertical impact. The sphere rotates and its trajectory deviates from the impact direction during the oblique impact process, while the non-axisymmetric liquid surface distortion experiences an evolution from half-cavity to full-cavity patterns. The dependence of motions of the sphere and the three-phase contact line on the impact angle $\alpha$ and Weber number are investigated, and the scaling laws for the sphere's penetration time and penetration depth are given. We provide a phase diagram with respect to the Weber number and impact angle that describes the observed impact modes of submergence and oscillation, which shows that the critical Weber number between two impact modes increases when the impact angle decreases. Additionally, a scaling model is established based on energy balance to distinguish different impact modes. The model indicates that the critical Weber number for the microsphere's oblique impact is equal to $1/{\rm sin}\,\alpha$ times that for vertical impact, agreeing well with the experimental results.

JFM classification

Interfacial Flows (free surface): Contact lines Waves/Free-surface Flows: Capillary waves
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 900 , 10 October 2020 , A17
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aristoff, J. M. & Bush, J. W. 2009 Water entry of small hydrophobic spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 619, 45–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristoff, J. M., Truscott, T. T., Techet, A. H. & Bush, J. W. 2010 The water entry of decelerating spheres. Phys. Fluids 22, 70–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bae, S. Y., Jung, C. H. & Kim, Y. P. 2010 Derivation and verification of an aerosol dynamics expression for the below-cloud scavenging process using the moment method. J. Aerosol Sci. 41, 266–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, R., van der Meer, D., Gekle, S., van der Bos, A. & Lohse, D. 2009 Controlled impact of a disk on a water surface: cavity dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 633, 381–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodily, K. G. 2013 The water entry of slender axisymmetric bodies: forces, trajectories and acoustics. MS thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.Google Scholar
Bush, J. W. & Hu, D. L. 2006 Walking on water: biolocomotion at the interface. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38, 339–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L., Heim, L., Golovko, D. S. & Bonaccurso, E. 2012 Snap-in dynamics of single particles to water drops. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 (3), 031601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H., Liu, H., Lu, X. & Ding, H. 2018 Entrapping an impacting particle at a liquid–gas interface. J. Fluid Mech. 841, 1073–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clanet, C., Hersen, F. & Bocquet, L. 2004 Secrets of successful stone-skipping. Nature 427, 29–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ding, H., Chen, B. Q., Liu, H. R., Zhang, C. Y., Gao, P. & Lu, X. Y. 2015 On the contact-line pinning in cavity formation during solid–liquid impact. J. Fluid Mech. 783, 504–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duez, C., Ybert, C., Clanet, C. & Bocquet, L. 2007 Making a splash with water repellency. Nat. Phys. 3, 180–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gekle, S., Gordillo, J. M., van der Meer, D. & Lohse, D. 2009 High-speed jet formation after solid object impact. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 034502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grumstrup, T., Keller, J. B. & Belmonte, A. 2007 Cavity ripples observed during the impact of solid objects into liquids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 114502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hrubes, J. D. 2001 High-speed imaging of supercavitating underwater projectiles. Exp. Fluids 30, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, D. L., Chan, B. & Bush, J. W. 2003 The hydrodynamics of water strider locomotion. Nature 424, 663–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaworek, A., Balachandran, W., Krupa, A., Kulon, J. & Lackowski, M. 2006 Wet electroscrubbers for state of the art gas cleaning. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 6197–6207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ji, B., Song, Q., Wang, A. & Yao, Q. 2019 Critical sinking of hydrophobic micron particles. Chem. Eng. Sci. 207, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, B., Song, Q. & Yao, Q. 2017 Numerical study of hydrophobic micron particle's impaction on liquid surface. Phys. Fluids 29, 3627–3628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, B., Song, Q. & Yao, Q. 2018 Limit for small spheres to float by dynamic analysis. Langmuir 34, 10163–10168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, W. 1998 The ricochet of spinning and non-spinning spherical projectiles, mainly from water. Part II: An outline of theory and warlike applications. Intl J. Impact Engng 21, 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. & Reid, S. R. 1975 Ricochet of spheres off water. J. Mech. Engng Sci. 17, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaptay, G. 1996 Interfacial phenomena during melt processing of ceramic particle-reinforced metal matrix composites. Part II: Interfacial force between a spherical particle and an approaching solid/liquid interface. Mater. Sci. Forum 215–216, 467–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. J., Fezzaa, K., An, J., Sun, T. & Jung, S. 2017 Capillary spreading of contact line over a sinking sphere. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 134102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kintea, D. M., Breitenbach, J., Gurumurthy, V. T., Roisman, I. V. & Tropea, C. 2016 On the influence of surface tension during the impact of particles on a liquid-gaseous interface. Phys. Fluids 28, 012108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. G. & Kim, H. Y. 2008 Impact of a superhydrophobic sphere onto water. Langmuir 24, 142–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, D., He, Q. & Evans, G. M. 2010 Penetration behaviour of individual hydrophilic particle at a gas–liquid interface. Adv. Powder Technol. 21, 401–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miloh, T. 1991 On the oblique water-entry problem of a rigid sphere. J. Engng Maths 25, 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitra, S., Doroodchi, E., Pareek, V., Joshi, J. & Evans, G. 2015 Collision behaviour of a smaller particle into a larger stationary droplet. Adv. Powder Technol. 26, 280–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghisi, M. & Squire, P. T. 1981 An experimental investigation of the initial force of impact on a sphere striking a liquid surface. J. Fluid Mech. 108, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosellini, L., Hersen, F., Clanet, C. & Bocquet, L. 2005 Skipping stones. J. Fluid Mech. 543, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seddon, C. & Moatamedi, M. 2006 Review of water entry with applications to aerospace structures. Intl J. Impact Engng 32, 1045–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, T. & Abraham, J 2014 Effect of impact velocity and mass ratio during vertical sphere water entry. Dev. Appl. Oceanic Engng 3, 55–62.Google Scholar
Shiffman, M. & Spencerd, C. 1945 a The force of impact on a sphere striking a water surface. AMP Tech. Rep. 42, lR. AMG-NYU No. 105.Google Scholar
Shiffman, M. & Spencerd, C. 1945 b The force of impact on a sphere striking a water surface. AMP Tech. Rep. 42, 2R. AMG-NYU No. 133.Google Scholar
Speirs, N. B., Mansoor, M. M., Belden, J. & Truscott, T. T. 2019 Water entry of spheres with various contact angles. J. Fluid Mech. 862, R3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truscott, T. T., Epps, B. P. & Belden, J. 2013 Water entry of projectiles. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46, 355–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vella, D. & Li, J. 2010 The impulsive motion of a small cylinder at an interface. Phys. Fluids 22, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, A., Song, Q., Ji, B. & Yao, Q. 2017 In-situ observation of hydrophobic micron particle impaction on liquid surface. Powder Technol. 311, 408–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Won, Y. S., Chung, D. K. & Mills, A. F. 1981 Density, viscosity, surface tension, and carbon dioxide solubility and diffusivity of methanol, ethanol, aqueous propanol, and aqueous ethylene glycol at 25 $^{\circ }$C. J. Chem. Engng Data 26 (2), 140–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, N. 2013 Experimental methodology investigation of pulverized coal combustion in counterflow flames. PhD thesis, Tsinghua University.Google Scholar
Zhu, S. J., Liu, R. Z., Wang, T., Niu, Y. J., Lu, H. F. & Chen, X. L. 2019 Penetration time of hydrophilic micron particles impacting into an unconfined planar gas–liquid interface. Chem. Engng Sci. 193, 282–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ji et al. supplementary movie 1

A 249 μm diameter PMMA sphere impacts a quiescent water surface with velocity u0 = 2.74 m/s (We = 34, Re = 894) and impact angle of 13.3°exhibiting an oscillation mode. The movie is played back at 1/2800 of real speed.

Download Ji et al. supplementary movie 1(Video)
Video 360.6 KB

Ji et al. supplementary movie 2

A 240 μm diameter PMMA sphere impacts a quiescent water surface with velocity u0 = 2.89 m/s (We = 16, Re = 529) and impact angle of 29.5°exhibiting an oscillation mode. The movie is played back at 1/2800 of real speed.

Download Ji et al. supplementary movie 2(Video)
Video 385.9 KB

Ji et al. supplementary movie 3

A 220.7 μm diameter PMMA sphere impacts a quiescent water surface with velocity u0 = 3.36 m/s (We = 34, Re = 740) and impact angle of 29.5°exhibiting an oscillation mode. The movie is played back at 1/2800 of real speed.

Download Ji et al. supplementary movie 3(Video)
Video 247.2 KB

Ji et al. supplementary movie 4

A 284.9 μm diameter PMMA sphere impacts a quiescent water surface with velocity u0 = 3.59 m/s (We = 50, Re = 1021) and impact angle of 29.5°exhibiting an oscillation mode. The movie is played back at 1/2800 of real speed.

Download Ji et al. supplementary movie 4(Video)
Video 347.1 KB

Ji et al. supplementary movie 5

A 306 μm diameter PMMA sphere impacts a quiescent water surface with velocity u0 = 2.84 m/s (We = 34, Re = 867) and impact angle of 43.8°exhibiting an oscillation mode. The movie is played back at 1/2800 of real speed.

Download Ji et al. supplementary movie 5(Video)
Video 610.9 KB

Ji et al. supplementary movie 6

A 246.3 μm diameter PMMA sphere impacts a quiescent water surface with velocity u0 = 3.15 m/s (We = 34, Re = 774) and impact angle of 56°exhibiting an oscillation mode. The movie is played back at 1/2800 of real speed.

Download Ji et al. supplementary movie 6(Video)
Video 294.7 KB

Ji et al. supplementary movie 7

A 295 μm diameter PMMA sphere impacts a quiescent water surface with velocity u0 = 2.89 m/s (We = 34, Re = 851) and impact angle of 72.8°exhibiting an oscillation mode. The movie is played back at 1/2800 of real speed.

Download Ji et al. supplementary movie 7(Video)
Video 323.5 KB

Ji et al. supplementary movie 8

A 327 μm diameter PMMA sphere impacts a quiescent water surface with velocity u0 = 2.74 m/s (We = 34, Re = 894) and impact angle of 89°exhibiting an oscillation mode. The movie is played back at 1/2800 of real speed.

Download Ji et al. supplementary movie 8(Video)
Video 534.3 KB