Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:06:15.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mineral dissolution and wormholing from a pore-scale perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2017

Cyprien Soulaine Open the ORCID record for Cyprien Soulaine [Opens in a new window] ,
Sophie Roman ,
Anthony Kovscek  and
Hamdi A. Tchelepi
Cyprien Soulaine*
Affiliation:
Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 95305, USA
Sophie Roman
Affiliation:
Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 95305, USA
Anthony Kovscek
Affiliation:
Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 95305, USA
Hamdi A. Tchelepi
Affiliation:
Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 95305, USA
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A micro-continuum approach is proposed to simulate the dissolution of solid minerals at the pore scale under single-phase flow conditions. The approach employs a Darcy–Brinkman–Stokes formulation and locally averaged conservation laws combined with immersed boundary conditions for the chemical reaction at the solid surface. The methodology compares well with the arbitrary-Lagrangian–Eulerian technique. The simulation framework is validated using an experimental microfluidic device to image the dissolution of a single calcite crystal. The evolution of the calcite crystal during the acidizing process is analysed and related to the flow conditions. Macroscopic laws for the dissolution rate are proposed by upscaling the pore-scale simulations. Finally, the emergence of wormholes during the injection of acid in a two-dimensional domain of calcite grains is discussed based on pore-scale simulations.

JFM classification

Low-Reynolds-number flows: Low-Reynolds-number flows Instability: Nonlinear instability Low-Reynolds-number flows: Porous media
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 827 , 25 September 2017 , pp. 457 - 483
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algive, L., Bekri, S. & Vizika, O. 2010 Pore-network modeling dedicated to the determination of the petrophysical-property changes in the presence of reactive fluid. SPE J. 15 (03), 618–633.Google Scholar
Angot, P., Bruneau, C.-H. & Fabrie, P. 1999 A penalization method to take into account obstacles in incompressible viscous flows. Numer. Math. 81 (4), 497–520.Google Scholar
Békri, S., Thovert, J. F. & Adler, P. M. 1995 Dissolution of porous media. Chem. Engng Sci. 50 (17), 2765–2791.Google Scholar
Bousquet-Melou, P., Goyeau, B., Quintard, M., Fichot, F. & Gobin, D. 2002 Average momentum equation for interdendritic flow in a solidifying columnar mushy zone. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 45 (17), 3651–3665.Google Scholar
Brinkman, H. C. 1947 A calculation of the viscous force exerted by a flowing fluid on a dense swarm of particles. Appl. Sci. Res. A1, 27–34.Google Scholar
Chen, L., Kang, Q., Viswanathan, H. S. & Tao, W.-Q. 2014 Pore-scale study of dissolution-induced changes in hydrologic properties of rocks with binary minerals. Water Resour. Res. 50 (12), 9343–9365.Google Scholar
Cohen, C. E., Ding, D., Quintard, M. & Bazin, B. 2008 From pore scale to wellbore scale: impact of geometry on wormhole growth in carbonate acidization. Chem. Engng Sci. 63 (12), 3088–3099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Y. & Rothman, D. H. 2015 Mechanisms for mechanical trapping of geologically sequestered carbon dioxide. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 471, 20140853.Google Scholar
Daccord, G. & Lenormand, R. 1987 Fractal patterns from chemical dissolution. Nature 325 (6099), 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daccord, G., Lietard, O. & Lenormand, R. 1993 Chemical dissolution of a porous medium by a reactive fluid – ii. Convection versus reaction, behavior diagram. Chem. Engng Sci. 48 (1), 179–186.Google Scholar
Davarzani, H., Marcoux, M. & Quintard, M. 2010 Theoretical predictions of the effective thermodiffusion coefficients in porous media. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 53 (7), 1514–1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D. A., Shapiro, M. & Brenner, H. 1993 Dispersion and reaction in two-dimensional model porous media. Phys. Fluids A 5 (4), 837–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmanuel, S. & Berkowitz, B. 2005 Mixing-induced precipitation and porosity evolution in porous media. Adv. Water Resour. 28 (4), 337–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredd, C. N. & Fogler, H. S. 1998a Alternative stimulation fluids and their impact on carbonate acidizing. SPE J. 13 (1), 34–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredd, C. N. & Fogler, H. S. 1998b Influence of transport and reaction on wormhole formation in porous media. AIChE J. 44 (9), 1933–1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golfier, F., Zarcone, C., Bazin, B., Lenormand, R., Lasseux, D. & Quintard, M. 2002 On the ability of a Darcy-scale model to capture wormhole formation during the dissolution of a porous medium. J. Fluid Mech. 457, 213–254.Google Scholar
Guo, J., Laouafa, F. & Quintard, M. 2016a A theoretical and numerical framework for modeling gypsum cavity dissolution. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 40, 1662–1689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, J., Quintard, M. & Laouafa, F. 2015 Dispersion in porous media with heterogeneous nonlinear reactions. Trans. Porous Med. 109 (3), 541–570.Google Scholar
Guo, J., Veran-Tissoires, S. & Quintard, M. 2016b Effective surface and boundary conditions for heterogeneous surfaces with mixed boundary conditions. J. Comput. Phys. 305, 942–963.Google Scholar
Hsu, C. T. & Cheng, P. 1990 Thermal dispersion in a porous medium. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 33 (8), 1587–1597.Google Scholar
Huang, H. & Li, X. 2011 Pore-scale simulation of coupled reactive transport and dissolution in fractures and porous media using the level set interface tracking method. J. Nanjing University (Natural Sciences) 47 (3), 235–251.Google Scholar
Huber, C., Shafei, B. & Parmigiani, A. 2014 A new pore-scale model for linear and non-linear heterogeneous dissolution and precipitation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 124 (0), 109–130.Google Scholar
Issa, R. I. 1985 Solution of the implicitly discretised fluid flow equations by operator-splitting. J. Comput. Phys. 62, 40–65.Google Scholar
Kalia, N. & Balakotaiah, V. 2007 Modeling and analysis of wormhole formation in reactive dissolution of carbonate rocks. Chem. Engng Sci. 62, 919–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Q., Chen, L., Valocchi, A. J. & Viswanathan, H. S. 2014 Pore-scale study of dissolution-induced changes in permeability and porosity of porous media. J. Hydrol. 517, 1049–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Q., Zhang, D. & Chen, S. 2003 Simulation of dissolution and precipitation in porous media. J. Geophys. Res. 108 (B10), 1–5.Google Scholar
Khadra, K., Angot, P., Parneix, S. & Caltagirone, J.-P. 2000 Fictitious domain approach for numerical modelling of Navier–Stokes equations. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 34 (8), 651–684.Google Scholar
Kim, D., Peters, C. A. & Lindquist, W. B. 2011 Upscaling geochemical reaction rates accompanying acidic CO2 -saturated brine flow in sandstone aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 47 (1), W01505.Google Scholar
Landrot, G., Ajo-Franklin, J. B., Yang, L., Cabrini, S. & Steefel, C. I. 2012 Measurement of accessible reactive surface area in a sandstone, with application to CO2 mineralization. Chem. Geol. 318, 113–125.Google Scholar
Li, L., Peters, C. A. & Celia, M. A. 2006 Upscaling geochemical reaction rates using pore-scale network modeling. Adv. Water Resour. 29 (9), 1351–1370.Google Scholar
Li, X., Huang, H. & Meakin, P. 2010 A three-dimensional level set simulation of coupled reactive transport and precipitation/dissolution. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 53 (13), 2908–2923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtner, P. C. 1988 The quasi-stationary state approximation to coupled mass transport and fluid–rock interaction in a porous medium. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 52 (1), 143–165.Google Scholar
Liu, X., Ormond, A., Bartko, K., Ying, L. & Ortoleva, P. 1997 A geochemical reaction-transport simulator for matrix acidizing analysis and design. J. Petrol. Sci. Engng 17 (1), 181–196.Google Scholar
Liu, X. & Ortoleva, P. 1996 A general-purpose, geochemical reservoir simulator. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers.Google Scholar
Luo, H., Laouafa, F., Debenest, G. & Quintard, M. 2015 Large scale cavity dissolution: from the physical problem to its numerical solution. Eur. J. Mech. (B/Fluids) 52, 131–146.Google Scholar
Luo, H., Laouafa, F., Guo, J. & Quintard, M. 2014 Numerical modeling of three-phase dissolution of underground cavities using a diffuse interface model. Intl J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 38, 1600–1616.Google Scholar
Luo, H., Quintard, M., Debenest, G. & Laouafa, F. 2012 Properties of a diffuse interface model based on a porous medium theory for solid–liquid dissolution problems. Comput. Geosci. 16 (4), 913–932.Google Scholar
Mauri, R. 1991 Dispersion, convection, and reaction in porous media. Phys. Fluids A 3 (5), 743–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molins, S., Trebotich, D., Yang, L., Ajo-Franklin, J. B., Ligocki, T. J., Shen, C. & Steefel, C. I. 2014 Pore-scale controls on calcite dissolution rates from flow-through laboratory and numerical experiments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48 (13), 7453–7460.Google Scholar
Neale, G. & Nader, W. 1974 Practical significance of Brinkman’s extension of Darcy’s law: coupled parallel flows within a channel and a bounding porous medium. Can. J. Chem. Engng 52 (4), 475–478.Google Scholar
Noiriel, C., Luquot, L., Madé, B., Raimbault, L., Gouze, P. & van der Lee, J. 2009 Changes in reactive surface area during limestone dissolution: an experimental and modelling study. Chem. Geol. 265 (1–2), 160–170; CO $_{2}$ geological storage: integrating geochemical, hydrodynamical, mechanical and biological processes from the pore to the reservoir scale.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noiriel, C., Madé, B. & Gouze, P. 2007 Impact of coating development on the hydraulic and transport properties in argillaceous limestone fracture. Water Resour. Res. 43 (9), 1–16.Google Scholar
Oltéan, C., Golfier, F. & Buès, M. A. 2013 Numerical and experimental investigation of buoyancy-driven dissolution in vertical fracture. J. Geophys. Res. 118 (5), 2038–2048.Google Scholar
Ormond, A. & Ortoleva, P. 2000 Numerical modeling of reaction-induced cavities in a porous rock. J. Geophys. Res. 105 (B7), 16737–16747.Google Scholar
Panga, M. K. R., Ziauddin, M. & Balakotaiah, V. 2005 Two-scale continuum model for simulation of wormholes in carbonate acidization. AIChE J. 51 (12), 3231–3248.Google Scholar
Rathnaweera, T. D., Ranjith, P. G. & Perera, M. S. A. 2016 Experimental investigation of geochemical and mineralogical effects of CO2 sequestration on flow characteristics of reservoir rock in deep saline aquifers. Sci. Rep. 6, 19362.Google Scholar
Roman, S., Soulaine, C., Abu AlSaud, M., Kovscek, A. & Tchelepi, H. 2016 Particle velocimetry analysis of immiscible two-phase flow in micromodels. Adv. Water Resour. 95, 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheibe, T. D., Perkins, W. A., Richmond, M. C., McKinley, M. I., Romero-Gomez, P. D. J., Oostrom, M., Wietsma, T. W., Serkowski, J. A. & Zachara, J. M. 2015 Pore-scale and multiscale numerical simulation of flow and transport in a laboratory-scale column. Water Resour. Res. 51 (2), 1023–1035.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. & Brenner, H. 1988 Dispersion of a chemically reactive solute in a spatially periodic model of a porous medium. Chem. Engng Sci. 43 (3), 551–571.Google Scholar
Song, W., de Haas, T. W., Fadaei, H. & Sinton, D. 2014 Chip-off-the-old-rock: the study of reservoir-relevant geological processes with real-rock micromodels. Lab on a Chip 14, 4382–4390.Google Scholar
Soulaine, C., Gjetvaj, F., Garing, C., Roman, S., Russian, A., Gouze, P. & Tchelepi, H. 2016 The impact of sub-resolution porosity of x-ray microtomography images on the permeability. Trans. Porous Med. 113 (1), 227–243.Google Scholar
Soulaine, C., Quintard, M., Allain, H., Baudouy, B. & Weelderen, R. V. 2015 A piso-like algorithm to simulate superfluid helium flow with the two-fluid model. Comput. Phys. Commun. 187 (0), 20–28.Google Scholar
Soulaine, C. & Tchelepi, H. A. 2016a Micro-continuum approach for pore-scale simulation of subsurface processes. Trans. Porous Med. 113, 431–456.Google Scholar
Soulaine, C. & Tchelepi, H. A. 2016b Micro-continuum formulation for modelling dissolution in natural porous media. In ECMOR XV – 15th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery 29 August–1 September 2016, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 1–11. EAGE.Google Scholar
Starchenko, V., Marra, C. J. & Ladd, A. J. C. 2016 Three-dimensional simulations of fracture dissolution. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121, 6421–6444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steefel, C. I., Molins, S. & Trebotich, D. 2013 Pore scale processes associated with subsurface CO2 injection and sequestration. Rev. Mineralogy Geochem. 77 (1), 259–303.Google Scholar
Swoboda-Colberg, N. G. & Drever, J. I. 1993 Mineral dissolution rates in plot-scale field and laboratory experiments. Chem. Geol. 105 (1–3), 51–69.Google Scholar
Szymczak, P. & Ladd, A. J. C. 2004 Microscopic simulations of fracture dissolution. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31 (23), 1–4.Google Scholar
Szymczak, P. & Ladd, A. J. C. 2009 Wormhole formation in dissolving fractures. J. Geophys. Res. 114 (B6), 1–22.Google Scholar
Trebotich, D. & Graves, D. 2015 An adaptive finite volume method for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations in complex geometries. Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. 10 (1), 43–82.Google Scholar
Vafai, K. & Tien, C. L. 1981 Boundary and inertia effects on flow and heat transfer in porous media. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 24 (2), 195–203.Google Scholar
Vafai, K. & Tien, C. L. 1982 Boundary and inertia effects on convective mass transfer in porous media. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 25 (8), 1183–1190.Google Scholar
Varloteaux, C., Békri, S. & Adler, P. M. 2013a Pore network modelling to determine the transport properties in presence of a reactive fluid: from pore to reservoir scale. Adv. Water Resour. 53, 87–100.Google Scholar
Varloteaux, C., Vu, M. T., Békri, S. & Adler, P. M. 2013b Reactive transport in porous media: pore-network model approach compared to pore-scale model. Phys. Rev. E 87 (2), 023010.Google Scholar
Wakao, N. & Smith, J. M. 1962 Diffusion in catalyst pellets. Chem. Engng Sci. 17 (11), 825–834.Google Scholar
Whitaker, S. 1999 The Method of Volume Averaging. Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. B., Gidley, J. L. & Schechter, R. S. 1979 Acidizing Fundamentals.; Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME, Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME.Google Scholar
Xu, Z., Huang, H., Li, X. & Meakin, P. 2012 Phase field and level set methods for modeling solute precipitation and/or dissolution. Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (1), 15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar