Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:19:04.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanisms of non-modal energy amplification in channel flow between compliant walls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2009

JÉRÔME HŒPFFNER*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan
ALESSANDRO BOTTARO
Affiliation:
DICAT, Università di Genova, Via Montallegro 1, 16145 Genova, Italy
JULIEN FAVIER
Affiliation:
DICAT, Università di Genova, Via Montallegro 1, 16145 Genova, Italy
*
Present address: Institut Jean le Rond D'Alembert, UMR 7190, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

The mechanisms leading to large transient growth of disturbances for the flow in a channel with compliant walls are investigated. The walls are modelled as thin spring-backed plates, and the flow dynamics is modelled using the Navier–Stokes equations linearized round the Poiseuille profile. Analysis for streamwise invariant perturbations show that this fluid-structure system can sustain oscillatory energy evolution of large amplitude, in the form of spanwise standing waves. Such waves are related to the travelling waves which a free wall can support, modified to account for an ‘added mass’ effect. Simple scaling arguments are found to provide results in excellent agreement with computations of optimal disturbances, for low-to-moderate values of the stiffness parameter characterizing the compliant surface.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benjamin, T. B. 1960 Effects of a flexible boundary on hydrodynamic stability. J. Fluid Mech. 9, 513532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, P. W., Davies, C. & Lucey, A. D. 2000 Hydrodynamics and compliant walls: does the dolphin have a secret? Curr. Sci. 79, 758765.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P. W. & Garrad, A. D. 1985 The hydrodynamic stability of flow over Kramer-type compliant surfaces. Part 1. Tollmien–Schlichting instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 155, 465510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, P. W. & Garrad, A. D. 1986 The hydrodynamic stability of flow over Kramer-type compliant surfaces. Part 2. Flow-induced surface instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 170, 199232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, P. W. & Pedley, T. J. (Ed.) 2003 Flow Past Highly Compliant Boundaries and in Collapsible Tubes, Fluid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol. 72. IUTAM Symposium. Springer.Google Scholar
Cossu, C. & Chomaz, J.-M. 1997 Global measures of local convective instabilities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 43874390.Google Scholar
Davies, C. & Carpenter, P. W. 1997 Instabilities in a plane channel flow between compliant walls. J. Fluid Mech. 352, 205243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenstein, U. & Gallaire, F. 2005 On two-dimensional temporal modes in spatially evolving open flows: the flat plate boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 536, 209218.Google Scholar
Fish, F. E. & Lauder, G. V. 2006 Passive and active flow control by swimming fishes and mammals. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38, 193224.Google Scholar
Gad-el Hak, M. 2000 Flow Control. Passive, Active, and Reactive Flow Management. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. 1936 Studies in animal locomotion. VI. the propulsive power of dolphins. J. Exp. Biol. 13, 192199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guaus, A. & Bottaro, A. 2007 Instabilities of the flow in a curved channel with compliant walls. Proc. R. Soc. A 463, 22012222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M. O. 1957 Boundary-layer stabilization by distributed damping. J. Aerosp. Sci. 24, 459460.Google Scholar
Kramer, M. O. 1960 Boundary-layer stabilization by distributed damping. J. Am. Soc. Navig. Engng 72, 2533.Google Scholar
Landahl, M. T. 1962 On the stability of a laminar incompressible boundary layer over a flexible surface. J. Fluid Mech. 13, 609632.Google Scholar
de Luca, L. & Caramiello, C. 2001 Temporal growth of perturbations energy in plane heterogeneous jets. AIAA Paper 2704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, S. V. & Hooper, A. P. 2007 Three-dimensional disturbances in channel flows. Phys. Fluids 19 (052102).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 2001 Stability and transition in shear flows. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, P. & Henningson, D. 2002 On the stability of a falling liquid curtain. J. Fluid Mech. 463, 163171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trefethen, L. 2000 Spectral Methods in Matlab. SIAM.Google Scholar
Weideman, J. A. & Reddy, S. C. 2000 A matlab differentiation matrix suite. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 26 (4), 465519.Google Scholar
Wiplier, O. & Ehrenstein, U. 2001 On the absolute instability in a boundary-layer flow with compliant coating. Eur. J. Mech. B – Fluids 20, 127144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoepffner et al. supplementary movie

Movie 1. Time evolution of the optimal initial conditions, for Re=1000, wavelength 2 π, and four different spring stifnesses K. The streamwise velocity perturbation is represented by the color map, whereas the inplane velocity is made visible using particles tracers. The arbitrary wall deformation and particle movement amplitudes are scaled such as to give a clear visual impression of the flow motion.

Download Hoepffner et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 10.3 MB

Hoepffner et al. supplementary movie

Movie 2. Animation of the model flow deformations for sinuous and varicose symmetries. The Poiseuille base flow is displaced up and down by the sinuous wall standing wave, or streched/contracted by the varicose deformation.

Download Hoepffner et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 3.2 MB