Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:26:24.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanism of drag reduction by a surface trip wire on a sphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2011

KWANGMIN SON ,
JIN CHOI ,
WOO-PYUNG JEON  and
HAECHEON CHOI
KWANGMIN SON
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-744, Korea
JIN CHOI
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-744, Korea
WOO-PYUNG JEON
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-744, Korea
HAECHEON CHOI*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-744, Korea Institute of Advanced Machinery and Design, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-744, Korea
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of a surface trip wire on the flow around a sphere is experimentally investigated at subcritical Reynolds numbers of Re = 0.5 × 105 – 2.8 × 105 based on the free-stream velocity U∞ and sphere diameter d. By varying the streamwise location (20° – 70° from the stagnation point) and diameter (0.33 × 10−2 < k/d < 1.33 × 10−2) of a trip wire, we measure the drag, surface pressure distribution and boundary layer velocity profiles above the sphere surface, and conduct flow visualization. Depending on the size and streamwise location of the trip wire, three different flow characteristics are observed above the sphere surface. For low Reynolds numbers, the disturbance induced by the trip wire decays downstream and main separation occurs at a streamwise location similar to that of a smooth sphere. As the Reynolds number is increased, laminar separation is delayed farther downstream by the disturbance from the trip wire and the transition to turbulence occurs along the separated shear layer, resulting in the flow reattachment to the sphere surface and thus forming a secondary separation bubble on the sphere surface. Then, the main separation is delayed due to high momentum near the surface and the drag is significantly reduced. When the trip wire produces even larger disturbances through the separation and reattachment right at the trip-wire location for higher Reynolds numbers, the boundary layer flow becomes turbulent soon after the trip-wire location and the main separation is delayed, resulting in drag reduction.

JFM classification

Flow Control: Drag reduction Wakes/Jets: Separated flows
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 672 , 10 April 2011 , pp. 411 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Achenbach, E. 1972 Experiments on the flow past spheres at very high Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 54, 565–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achenbach, E. 1974 The effect of surface roughness and tunnel blockage on the flow past spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 65, 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakić, V. 2004 Experimental investigation of a flow around a sphere. Therm. Sci. 8, 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bearman, P. W. & Harvey, J. K. 1976 Golf ball aerodynamics. Aeronaut. Q. 27, 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmichael, B. H. 1981 Low Reynolds number airfoil survey, vol. 1. NASA Contractor Rep. 165803.Google Scholar
Choi, H., Jeon, W.-P. & Kim, J. 2008 Control of flow over a bluff body. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, J., Jeon, W.-P. & Choi, H. 2006 Mechanism of drag reduction by dimples on a sphere. Phys. Fluids 18, 041702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fage, A. 1936 Experiments on a sphere at critical Reynolds numbers. Brit. Aero. Res. Counc. Rep. & Mem. 1766.Google Scholar
Fage, A. & Warsap, G. H. 1929 The effects of turbulence and surface roughness on the drag of a circular cylinder. Brit. Aero. Res. Counc. Rep. & Mem. 1283.Google Scholar
Fujita, H., Takahama, H. & Kawai, T. 1985 Effects of tripping wires on heat transfer from a circular cylinder in cross flow. Bull. Japan. Soc. Mech. Engng 28, 80–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gad-el-Hak, M. 1990 Control of low-speed airfoil aerodynamics. AIAA J. 28, 1537–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopalarathnam, A., Broughton, B. A., McGranahan, B. D. & Selig, M. S. 2003 Design of low Reynolds number airfoils with trips. J. Aircraft 40, 768–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hover, F. S., Tvedt, H. & Triantafyllou, M. S. 2001 Vortex-induced vibrations of a cylinder with tripping wires. J. Fluid Mech. 448, 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Igarashi, T. 1986 Effect of tripping wires on the flow around a circular cylinder normal to an airstream. Bull. Japan. Soc. Mech. Engng 29, 2917–2924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, D. F. & Truong, Q. S. 1972 Wind load on cylinder with spanwise protrusion. Proc. ASCE, J. Engng Mech. Div. 98, 1573–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeon, S., Choi, J., Jeon, W.-P., Choi, H. & Park, J. 2004 Active control of flow over a sphere for drag reduction at a subcritical Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 517, 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lissaman, P. B. S. 1983 Low Reynolds number airfoils. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 15, 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyon, C. A., Selig, M. S. & Broeren, A. P. 1997 Boundary layer trips on airfoils at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA Paper 97-0511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxworthy, T. 1969 Experiments on the flow around a sphere at high Reynolds numbers. J. Appl. Mech. 36, 598–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moradian, N., Ting, D. S.-K. & Cheng, S. 2009 The effects of freestream turbulence on the drag coefficient of a sphere. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 33, 460–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raithby, G. D. & Eckert, E. R. G. 1968 The effect of support position and turbulence intensity on the flow near the surface of a sphere. Warme- und Stoffubertragung. Bd. 1, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C., Beratlis, N., Balaras, E., Squires, K. & Tsunoda, M. 2009 Numerical investigation of the flow over a golf ball in the subcritical and supercritical regimes. In Sixth Int. Symp. Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, pp. 1013–1018.Google Scholar
Son, K., Choi, J., Jeon, W.-P. & Choi, H. 2010 Effect of free-stream turbulence on the flow over a sphere. Phys. Fluids 22, 045101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suryanarayana, G. K. & Prabhu, A. 2000 Effect of natural ventilation on the boundary-layer separation and near-wake vortex shedding characteristics of a sphere. Exp. Fluids 29, 582–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torlak, M., Perić, M., Hadžić, I. & Jensen, G. 2004 Numerical simulation of incompressible flow around a sphere with trip wire at Re = 50 000. In High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering '04, pp. 189–200. Springer.Google Scholar
Volino, R. J. 2003 Passive flow control on low-pressure turbine airfoils. ASME J. Turbomach. 125, 754–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieselsberger, C. 1914 A sphere drag (in German). Zeitschrift für Mechanik 5, 140–144.Google Scholar
Zdravkovich, M. M. 1997 Flow Around Circular Cylinders. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X. F. & Hodson, H. 2005 Combined effects of surface trips and unsteady wakes on the boundary layer development of an ultra-high-lift LP turbine blade. ASME J. Turbomach. 127, 479–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar