Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:48:42.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Langmuir turbulence in shallow water. Part 2. Large-eddy simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2007

A. E. TEJADA-MARTÍNEZ  and
C. E. GROSCH
A. E. TEJADA-MARTÍNEZ
Affiliation:
Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23509, USA
C. E. GROSCH
Affiliation:
Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23509, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Results of large-eddy simulation (LES) of Langmuir circulations (LC) in a wind-driven shear current in shallow water are reported. The LC are generated via the well-known Craik–Leibovich vortex force modelling the interaction between the Stokes drift, induced by surface gravity waves, and the shear current. LC in shallow water is defined as a flow in sufficiently shallow water that the interaction between the LC and the bottom boundary layer cannot be ignored, thus requiring resolution of the bottom boundary layer. After the introduction and a description of the governing equations, major differences in the statistical equilibrium dynamics of wind-driven shear flow and the same flow with LC (both with a bottom boundary layer) are highlighted. Three flows with LC will be discussed. In the first flow, the LC were generated by intermediate-depth waves (relative to the wavelength of the waves and the water depth). The amplitude and wavelength of these waves are representative of the conditions reported in the observations of A. E. Gargett & J. R. Wells in Part 1 (J. Fluid Mech. vol .000, 2007, p. 00). In the second flow, the LC were generated by shorter waves. In the third flow, the LC were generated by intermediate waves of greater amplitude than those in the first flow. The comparison between the different flows relies on visualizations and diagnostics including (i) profiles of mean velocity, (ii) profiles of resolved Reynolds stress components, (iii) autocorrelations, (iv) invariants of the resolved Reynolds stress anisotropy tensor and (v) balances of the transport equations for mean resolved turbulent kinetic energy and resolved Reynolds stresses. Additionally, dependencies of LES results on Reynolds number, subgrid-scale closure, size of the domain and grid resolution are addressed.

In the shear flow without LC, downwind (streamwise) velocity fluctuations are characterized by streaks highly elongated in the downwind direction and alternating in sign in the crosswind (spanwise) direction. Forcing this flow with the Craik–Leibovich force generating LC leads to streaks with larger characteristic crosswind length scales consistent with those recorded by observations. In the flows with LC, in the mean, positive streaks exhibit strong intensification near the bottom and near the surface leading to intensified downwind velocity ‘jets’ in these regions. In the flow without LC, such intensification is noticeably absent. A revealing diagnostic of the structure of the turbulence is the depth trajectory of the invariants of the resolved Reynolds stress anisotropy tensor, which for a realizable flow must lie within the Lumley triangle. The trajectory for the flow without LC reveals the typical structure of shear-dominated turbulence in which the downwind component of the resolved normal Reynolds stresses is greater than the crosswind and vertical components. In the near bottom and surface regions, the trajectory for the flow with LC driven by wave and wind forcing conditions representative of the field observations reveals a two-component structure in which the downwind and crosswind components are of the same order and both are much greater than the vertical component. The two-component structure of the Langmuir turbulence predicted by LES is consistent with the observations in the bottom third of the water column above the bottom boundary layer.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 576 , 10 April 2007 , pp. 63 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armfield, S. W. & Street, R. 2000 Fractional step methods for the Navier–Stokes equations on non-staggered grids. ANZIAM J. 42 (E), C134–C156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, D. G. & McIntyre, M. E. 1978a An exact theory of nonlinear waves on Lagrangian-mean flow. J. Fluid Mech. 89, 609–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, D. G. & McIntyre, M. E. 1978b On wave-action and its relatives. J. Fluid. Mech. 89, 647–664 (and corrigendum 95, 796).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bech, K. H., Tillmark, N., Alfredsson, H. & Andersson, H. I. 1995 An investigation of turbulent plane Couette flow at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 73, 401–426.Google Scholar
Carpenter, M. H., Gottlieb, D. & Abarbanel, S. 1993 The stability of numerical boundary treatments for compact high-order finite-difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 108, 272–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chini, G. P. & Leibovich, S. 2003 Resonant Langmuir-circulation–internal-wave interaction. Part 1. Internal wave reflection. J. Fluid Mech. 495, 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chini, G. P. & Leibovich, S. 2005 Resonant Langmuir-circulation–internal-wave interaction. Part 2. Langmuir circulation instability. J. Fluid Mech. 524, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, A. D. D. 1977 The generation of Langmuir circulations by an instability mechanism. J. Fluid Mech. 81, 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, A. D. D. 1985 Wave Interactions and Fluid Flows. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Craik, A. D. D. & Leibovich, S. 1976 A rational model for Langmuir circulation. J. Fluid Mech. 73, 401–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, S. M. & Leibovich, S. 1993 Langmuir circulations in a surface layer bounded by a strong thermocline. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 23, 1330–1345.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, S. M. & Leibovich, S. 1994 Large-scale Langmuir circulation and double-diffusive convection: evolution equations and flow transitions. J. Fluid Mech. 276, 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, S. M. & Leibovich, S. 1997 Large-scale three-dimensional Langmuir circulation. Phys. Fluids 9, 2851–2863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargett, A. E. & Wells, J. R. 2007 Langmuir turbulence in shallow water. Part 1. Observations. J. Fluid Mech. 576, 27–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargett, A., Wells, R., Tejada-Martínez, A. E. & Grosch, C. E. 2004 Langmuir supercells: a dominant mechanism for sediment resuspension and transport. Science 306, 1925–1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, D. D. 1996 The ideal Craik–Leibovich equations. Physica D 98, 415–441.Google Scholar
Kim, J., Moin, P. & Moser, R. 1987 Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langmuir, I. 1938 Surface motion induced by the wind. Science 87, 119–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeBlond, P. H. and Mysak, L. A. 1978 Waves in the Ocean. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lee, M. J. & Kim, J. 1991 The structure of turbulence in a simulated plane Couette flow. In Proc. 8th Symp. Shear Flows, Munich, Germany}, paper 5-3.Google Scholar
Leibovich, S. 1977a On the evolution of the system of wind drift currents and Langmuir circulations in the ocean. Part 1. Theory and averaged current. J. Fluid Mech. 79, 715–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibovich, S. 1977b Convective instability of stably stratified water in the ocean. J. Fluid Mech. 82, 541–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibovich, S. 1980 On wave–current interaction theories of Langmuir circulations. J. Fluid Mech. 99, 715–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibovich, S. 1983 The form and dynamics of Langmuir circulations. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 15, 391–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibovich, S. 1985 Oscillatory and competing instabilities in a nonlinear model for Langmuir circulations. Phys. Fluids 28, 2050–2061.Google Scholar
Leibovich, S. & Radhakrishnan, K. 1977 On the evolution of the system of wind drift currents and Langmuir circulations in the ocean. Part 2. Structure of the Langmuir vortices. J. Fluid Mech. 80, 481–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibovich, S. & Tandon, A. 1993 Three dimensional Langmuir circulations and stability in a stratified layer. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 16 501–16 508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibovich, S., Lele, S. K. & Moroz, I. 1989 Nonlinear dynamics in Langmuir circulations and in thermosolutal convection. J. Fluid Mech. 198, 471–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lele, S. K. 1992 Compact finite difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 103, 16–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., Garrett, C. & Skyllingstad, E. 2005 A regime diagram for classifying turbulent large eddies in the upper ocean. Deep-Sea Res. I 52, 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilly, D. K. 1992 A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure. Phys. Fluids 3, 2746–2757.Google Scholar
Lumley, J. L. 1978 Computational modeling of turbulent flows. In Adv. Appl. Mech. 18, 123–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, T. S. 1997 On the use of discrete filters for large-eddy simulation. In Annu. Res. Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, NASA Ames/Stanford University, pp. 83–95.Google Scholar
McWilliams, J. C., Sullivan, P. P. & Moeng, C.-H. 1997 Langmuir turbulence in the ocean. J. Fluid Mech. 334, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, R., Kim, J. & Mansour, N. M. 1999 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to Reτ = 590. Phys. Fluids 11, 943–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morinishi, Y. & Vasilyev, O. V. 2001 A recommended modification to the dynamic two-parameter mixed subgrid scale model for large eddy simulation of turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids 13, 3400–3410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noh, Y., Min, H.-S. & Raasch, S. 2004 Large eddy simulation of the ocean mixed layer: the effects of wave breaking and Langmuir circulation. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 34, 720–735.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papavassiliou, D. V. & Hanratty, T. J. 1997 Interpretation of large-scale structures observed in a turbulent plane Couette flow. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 18, 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1967 Dynamics of the Upper Ocean. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyllingstad, E. D. & Denbo, D. W. 1995 An ocean large eddy simulation of Langmuir circulations and convection in the surface mixed layer. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 8501–8522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skyllingstad, E. D., Smyth, W. D., Moum, J. N. & Wijesekera, H. 1999 Upper-ocean turbulence during a westerly wind burst: a comparison of large-eddy simulation results and microstructure measurements. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 29, 5–28.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slinn, D. N. & Riley, J. J. 1998 A model for the simulation of turbulent boundary layers in an incompressible stratified flow. J. Comput. Phys. 144, 550–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smagorinsky, J. 1963 General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I. The basic experiment. Mon. Weather Rev. 91, 99–164.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, P. P., McWilliams, J. C. & Melville, W. K. 2005 Surface waves and oceanic mixing: insights from numerical simulations with stochastic surface forcing. In Proc. of the 14th ‘Aha Huliko'a Hawaiian Winter Workshop, pp. 147–155.Google Scholar
Tandon, A. & Leibovich, S. 1995a Secondary instabilities in Langmuir circulations J. Phys. Oceanogr. 25, 1206–1217.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tandon, A. & Leibovich, S. 1995b Simulations of three-dimensional Langmuir circulation in water of constant density. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 22 613–22 623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, S. 2004 Langmuir Circulation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsukahara, T. & Kawamura, H. 2004 Large scale structure captured in DNS of turbulent Couette and Poiseuille flows. Second Intl Workshop on Wall-Bounded Turbulent Flows, Trieste, Italy.Google Scholar
Winters, K. B., MacKinnon, J. A. & Mills, B. 2004 A spectral model for process studies of rotating density-stratified flows. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 21, 69–94.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar