Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:48:56.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inverse Magnus effect on a rotating sphere: when and why

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2014

Jooha Kim ,
Haecheon Choi ,
Hyungmin Park  and
Jung Yul Yoo
Jooha Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-744, Korea
Haecheon Choi*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-744, Korea Institute of Advanced Machines and Design, Seoul National University, Korea
Hyungmin Park
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-744, Korea
Jung Yul Yoo
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-744, Korea
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In some specific conditions, a flying spinning ball deflects in a direction opposite to that predicted by the Magnus effect, which is known as the inverse Magnus effect. To elucidate when and why this effect occurs, we measure the variations of the drag and lift forces on a rotating sphere and the corresponding flow field with the spin ratio (the ratio of the rotational velocity to the translational one). This counterintuitive phenomenon occurs because the boundary layer flow moving against the surface of a rotating sphere undergoes a transition to turbulence, whereas that moving with the rotating surface remains laminar. The turbulence energizes the flow and thus the main separation occurs farther downstream, inducing faster flow velocity there and generating negative lift force. Empirical formulae are derived to predict the location where the flow separates as a function of the Reynolds number and the spin ratio. Using the formulae derived, the condition for the onset of the inverse Magnus effect is suggested based on the negative lift generation mechanism.

JFM classification

Wakes/Jets: Separated flows Wakes/Jets: Wakes/Jets
Type
Rapids
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 754 , 10 September 2014 , R2
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achenbach, E. 1972 Experiments on the flow past spheres at very high Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 54, 565–575.Google Scholar
Aoki, K., Kinoshita, Y., Nagase, J. & Nakayama, Y. 2003a Dependence of aerodynamic characteristics and flow pattern on surface structure of a baseball. J. Vis. 6, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aoki, K., Ohike, A., Yamaguchi, K. & Nakayama, Y. 2003b Flying characteristics and flow pattern of a sphere with dimples. J. Vis. 6, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, J. B. & Domanski, M. J. 2008 Lift on stationary and rotating spheres under varying flow and surface conditions. AIAA J. 46, 1932–1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, L. J. 1959 Effect of spin and speed on the lateral deflection (curve) of a baseball; and the Magnus effect for smooth spheres. Am. J. Phys. 27, 589–596.Google Scholar
Choi, J., Jeon, W.-P. & Choi, H. 2006 Mechanism of drag reduction by dimples on a sphere. Phys. Fluids 18, 041702.Google Scholar
Choi, H., Jeon, W.-P. & Kim, J. 2008 Control of flow over a bluff body. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, J. M. 1949 The aerodynamics of golf balls. J. Appl. Phys. 20, 821–828.Google Scholar
Dickinson, M. H., Lehmann, F.-O. & Sane, S. P. 1999 Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science 284, 1954–1960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeon, S., Choi, J., Jeon, W.-P., Choi, H. & Park, J. 2004 Active control of flow over a sphere for drag reduction at a subcritical Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 517, 113–129.Google Scholar
Krahn, E. 1956 Negative Magnus force. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 23, 377–378.Google Scholar
Kray, T., Franke, J. & Frank, W. 2012 Magnus effect on a rotating sphere at high Reynolds numbers. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 110, 1–9.Google Scholar
Maccoll, J. W. 1928 Aerodynamics of a spinning sphere. J. R. Aero. Soc. 28, 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnus, G. 1853 Ueber die Abweichung der Geschosse, und: Ueber eine auffallende Erscheinung bei rotirenden Körpern. Ann. Phys. 164, 1–29.Google Scholar
Mehta, R. D. 1985 Aerodynamics of sports balls. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 17, 151–189.Google Scholar
Moore, F. K. 1958 On the separation of the unsteady laminar boundary layer. In Boundary Layer Research (ed. Görtler, H. G.), pp. 296–311. Springer.Google Scholar
Morisseau, K. C. 1985 Marine application of Magnus effect devices. Nav. Engrs J. 97, 51–57.Google Scholar
Muto, M., Tsubokura, M. & Oshima, N. 2012a Negative Magnus lift on a rotating sphere at around the critical Reynolds number. Phys. Fluids 24, 014102.Google Scholar
Muto, M., Tsubokura, M. & Oshima, N. 2012b Numerical visualization of boundary layer transition when negative Magnus effect occurs. J. Vis. 15, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rott, N. 1956 Unsteady viscous flow in the vicinity of a stagnation point. Q. Appl. Maths 13, 444–451.Google Scholar
Sears, W. R. 1956 Some recent developments in airfoil theory. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 23, 490–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seifert, J. 2012 A review of the Magnus effect in aeronautics. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 55, 17–45.Google Scholar
Son, K., Choi, J., Jeon, W.-P. & Choi, H. 2010 Effect of free-stream turbulence on the flow over a sphere. Phys. Fluids 22, 045101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Son, K., Choi, J., Jeon, W.-P. & Choi, H. 2011 Mechanism of drag reduction by a surface trip wire on a sphere. J. Fluid Mech. 672, 411–427.Google Scholar
Swanson, W. M. 1961 The Magnus effect: a summary of investigations to date. Trans. ASME J. Basic Engng 83, 461–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, T., Yamagata, K. & Tsuji, Y.1990 Experiment of fluid forces on a rotating sphere and spheroid. In Proceedings of the 2nd KSME–JSME Fluids Engineering Conference, Seoul, Korea, October, pp. 10–13.Google Scholar
Taneda, S. 1957 Negative Magnus effect. Rep. Res. Inst. Appl. Mech. 5, 123–128.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. 2013 Comparative Biomechanics: Life’s Physical World. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wauthy, G., Leponce, M., Banai, N., Sylin, G. & Lions, J.-C. 1998 The backward jump of a box moss mite. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 2235–2242.Google Scholar
White, B. R. & Schulz, J. C. 1977 Magnus effect in saltation. J. Fluid Mech. 81, 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar