Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T03:11:37.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Instability of a two-dimensional compressible jet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

C. H. Berman
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, Imperial College, London, S.W. 7
J. E. Ffowcs Williams
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, Imperial College, London, S.W. 7

Abstract

A linearized analysis of the two-dimensional double vortex sheet model of a jet shows that inviscid jet instabilities occur over a wide range of frequencies at all jet Mach numbers. No particular frequency for maximum growth rate exists unless finite shear layer thickness effects are considered. It is suggested that the model describes the essential characteristics of a real jet disturbed by long wavelength perturbations. The idea is advanced that the jet flow constitutes a broad band amplifier of high gain. Disturbances can grow rapidly to a size when nonlinear effects bring about significant interaction with the mean flow. By seeding the jet with disturbances of a type that are highly amplified it is argued that gross features of the flow may be affected and that the jet may be rendered less noisy at high Mach number. It is argued that some of these ideas are supported by the observation that a supersonic jet diffuses at an unusually rapid rate when subject to the oscillatory condition known as ‘screech’.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1970 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fejer, J. A. & Miles, J. W. 1963 On the stability of a plane vortex sheet with respect to three-dimensional disturbances. J. Fluid Mech. 15, 335.Google Scholar
Graham, E. W. & Graham, B. B. 1968 The effect of a shear layer on plane waves of sound in a fluid. Boeing Scientific Res. Labs. D1-82–0823.Google Scholar
Landahl, M. T. 1967 A wave guide model for turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 29, 441.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1962 Sound generated aerodynamically. The Bakerian Lecture 1961. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 267, 147183.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1956 On the reflection of sound at an interface of relative motion. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29, 226.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1958 On the disturbed motion of a plane vortex sheet. J. Fluid Mech. 4, 538.Google Scholar
Powell, A. 1953 On the mechanism of choked jet noise. Proc. Phys. Soc. Lond. B 66, 1039.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord 1945 The Theory of Sound, vol. 2. Dover: New York.
Wille, R. 1963 AFOSR Tech. Rep. Contract AF 61 (052)–412.