Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:05:04.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Initial surface deformations during impact on a liquid pool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2015

Wilco Bouwhuis ,
Maurice H. W. Hendrix ,
Devaraj van der Meer  and
Jacco H. Snoeijer
Wilco Bouwhuis*
Affiliation:
Physics of Fluids Group, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
Maurice H. W. Hendrix
Affiliation:
Physics of Fluids Group, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands Laboratory for Aero and Hydrodynamics, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 21, NL-2628 CA Delft, The Netherlands
Devaraj van der Meer
Affiliation:
Physics of Fluids Group, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
Jacco H. Snoeijer
Affiliation:
Physics of Fluids Group, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands Mesoscopic Transport Phenomena, Eindhoven University of Technology, Den Dolech 2, 5612 AZ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A tiny air bubble can be entrapped at the bottom of a solid sphere that impacts onto a liquid pool. The bubble forms due to the deformation of the liquid surface by a local pressure buildup inside the surrounding gas, as also observed during the impact of a liquid drop on a solid wall. Here, we perform a perturbation analysis to quantitatively predict the initial deformations of the free surface of a liquid pool as it is approached by a solid sphere. We study the natural limits where the gas can be treated as a viscous fluid (Stokes flow) or as an inviscid fluid (potential flow). For both cases we derive the spatiotemporal evolution of the pool surface, and recover some of the recently proposed scaling laws for bubble entrapment. On inserting typical experimental values for the impact parameters, we find that the bubble volume is mainly determined by the effect of gas viscosity.

JFM classification

Drops and Bubbles: Drops Drops and Bubbles: Drops and Bubbles
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 771 , 25 May 2015 , pp. 503 - 519
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2015 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergmann, R. P. H. M., van der Meer, D., Gekle, S., van der Bos, J. & Lohse, D. 2009 Controlled impact of a disk on a water surface: cavity dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 633, 381–409.Google Scholar
Bouwhuis, W., van der Veen, R. C. A., Tran, T., Keij, D. L., Winkels, K. G., Peters, I. R., van der Meer, D., Sun, C., Snoeijer, J. H. & Lohse, D. 2012 Maximal air bubble entrainment at liquid-drop impact. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 264501.Google Scholar
Bouwhuis, W., Winkels, K. G., Peters, I. R., Brunet, P., van der Meer, D. & Snoeijer, J. H. 2013 Oscillating and star-shaped drops levitated by an airflow. Phys. Rev. E 88, 023017.Google Scholar
van Dam, D. & Le Clerc, C. 2004 Experimental study of an ink-jet printed droplet on a solid substrate. Phys. Fluids 16, 3403–3414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, R. H., Serayssol, J.-M. & Hinch, E. J. 1986 The elastohydrodynamic collision of two spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 163, 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Q., Anilkumar, A. V. & Wang, T. G. 2009 The phenomenon of bubble entrapment during capsule formation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 333 (2), 523–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Do-Quang, M. & Amberg, G. 2009 The splash of a solid sphere impacting on a liquid surface: numerical simulation of the influence of wetting. Phys. Fluids 21 (2), 022102.Google Scholar
Driscoll, M. M. & Nagel, S. R. 2011 Ultrafast interference imaging of air in splashing dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 154502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hicks, P. D., Ermanyuk, E. V., Gavrilov, N. V. & Purvis, R. 2012 Air trapping at impact of a rigid sphere onto a liquid. J. Fluid Mech. 695, 310–320.Google Scholar
Hicks, P. D. & Purvis, R. 2011 Air cushioning in droplet impacts with liquid layers and other droplets. Phys. Fluids 23, 062104.Google Scholar
Howison, S. D., Ockendon, J. R. & Wilson, S. K. 1991 Incompressible water-entry problems at small deadrise angles. J. Fluid Mech. 222, 215–230.Google Scholar
Klaseboer, E., Chevaillier, J. P., Gourdon, C. & Masbernat, O. 2000 Film drainage between colliding drops at constant approach velocity: experiments and modeling. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 229 (1), 274–285.Google Scholar
Klaseboer, E., Manica, R. & Chan, D. Y. C. 2014 Universal behavior of the initial stage of drop impact. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 194501.Google Scholar
Korobkin, A. A., Ellis, A. S. & Smith, F. T. 2008 Trapping of air in impact between a body and shallow water. J. Fluid Mech. 611, 365–394.Google Scholar
Korobkin, A. A. & Pukhnachov, V. V. 1988 Initial stage of water impact. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 159–185.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1957 Hydrodynamics, 6th edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mandre, S. & Brenner, M. P. 2012 The mechanism of a splash on a dry solid surface. J. Fluid Mech. 690, 148–172.Google Scholar
Marston, J. O., Vakarelski, I. U. & Thoroddsen, S. T. 2011 Bubble entrapment during sphere impact onto quiescent liquid surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 680, 660–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, M. R. & Oliver, J. M. 2014 On air cushioning in axisymmetric impacts. IMA J. Appl. Maths 79, 661–680.Google Scholar
Oguz, H. N. & Prosperetti, A. 1993 Dynamics of bubble growth and detachment from a needle. J. Fluid Mech. 257, 111–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pozrikidis, C. 1997 Introduction to Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 1st edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, O. 1886 On the theory of lubrication and its application to Mr. Beauchamp Tower’s experiments, including an experimental determination of the viscosity of olive oil. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 177, 157–234.Google Scholar
Smith, F. T., Li, L. & Wu, G. X. 2003 Air cushioning with a lubrication/inviscid balance. J. Fluid Mech. 482, 291–318.Google Scholar
Snoeijer, J. H., Brunet, P. & Eggers, J. 2009 Maximum size of drops levitated by an air cushion. Phys. Rev. E 79, 036307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thoroddsen, S. T., Etoh, T. G., Takehara, K., Ootsuka, N. & Hatsuki, A. 2005 The air bubble entrapped under a drop impacting on a solid surface. J. Fluid Mech. 545, 203–212.Google Scholar
Thoroddsen, S. T., Thoraval, M. J., Takehara, K. & Etoh, T. G. 2012 Micro-bubble morphologies following drop impacts onto a pool surface. J.  Fluid Mech. 708, 469–479.Google Scholar
Tran, T., de Maleprade, H., Sun, C. & Lohse, D. 2013 Air entrainment during impact of droplets on liquid surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 726, R3.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. K. 1991 A mathematical model for the initial stages of fluid impact in the presence of a cushioning fluid layer. J. Engng Maths 25, 265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yiantsios, S. G. & Davis, R. H. 1990 On the buoyancy-driven motion of a drop towards a rigid surface or a deformable interface. J. Fluid Mech. 217, 547–573.Google Scholar
Yoon, Y., Borrell, M., Park, C. C. & Leal, L. G. 2005 Viscosity ratio effects on the coalescence of two equal-sized drops in a two-dimensional linear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 525, 355–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar