Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T12:04:38.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Halting scale and energy equilibration in two-dimensional quasigeostrophic turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2013

R. K. Scott*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews KY16 9SS, UK
D. G. Dritschel
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews KY16 9SS, UK
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

The halting scale of the inverse energy cascade and the partition between kinetic and potential energy are considered for the case of forced quasigeostrophic turbulence in the regime of intermediate Rossby deformation length, for which the deformation length is comparable to the energy-containing scales of the flow. Phenomenological estimates for the halting scale and equilibrated energy of the forced–dissipative system with a simple representation of large-scale thermal damping are tested against numerical integrations and are found to poorly describe the numerically obtained dependence on damping coefficient; a modified scaling law is proposed that more accurately describes the dependence. The scale-selective nature of the damping leads to a large-scale spectral bottleneck that steepens the energy spectrum, consistent with previous studies of hypodiffusive dissipation. It is found that, across the parameter range considered, the blocking is largely insensitive to the ratio of deformation radius to the energy-containing scales.

Type
Rapids
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, D. G., Holton, J. R. & Leovy, C. B. 1987 Middle Atmosphere Dynamics. Academic.Google Scholar
Borue, V. 1994 Inverse energy cascade in stationary two-dimensional homogeneous turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 14751478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danilov, S. & Gurarie, D. 2001 Nonuniversal features of forced two-dimensional turbulence in the energy range. Phys. Rev. E 63, 020203(R).Google Scholar
Hasegawa, A. & Mima, K. 1978 Pseudo-three-dimensional turbulence in magnetized nonuniform plasma. Phys. Fluids 21, 8792.Google Scholar
Iwayama, T., Shepherd, T. G. & Watanabe, T. 2002 An ‘ideal’ form of decaying two-dimensional turbulence. J. Fluid. Mech. 456, 183198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. 1967 Inertial ranges in two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids 10, 14171423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larichev, V. D. & McWilliams, J. C. 1991 Weakly-decaying turbulence in an equivalent barotropic fluid. Phys. Fluids A 3, 938950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R. K. 2007 Non-robustness of the two-dimensional turbulent inverse cascade. Phys. Rev. E 75, 046301.Google Scholar
Scott, R. K. & Polvani, L. M. 2007 Forced-dissipative shallow-water turbulence on the sphere and the atmospheric circulation of the gas planets. J. Atmos. Sci. 64, 31583176.Google Scholar
Scott, R. K. & Polvani, L. M. 2008 Equatorial superrotation in shallow atmospheres. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L24202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. S., Boccaletti, G., Henning, C. C., Marinov, I., Tam, C. Y., Held, I. M. & Vallis, G. K. 2002 Turbulent diffusion in the geostrophic inverse cascade. J. Fluid Mech. 469, 1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sukorianski, S., Galperin, B. & Chekhlov, A. 1999 Large scale drag represention in simulations of two-dimensional turbulence. Phys. Fluids 11, 30433053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallis, G. K. 2006 Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watanabe, T., Fujisaka, H. & Iwayama, T. 1997 Dynamical scaling law in the development of drift wave turbulence. Phys. Rev. E 55, 55755580.Google Scholar