Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T14:09:46.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flow-mediated organization of two freely flapping swimmers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2021

Xingjian Lin
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu210016, PR China Department of Aerodynamics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu210016, PR China
Jie Wu*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu210016, PR China Department of Aerodynamics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu210016, PR China Key Laboratory of Unsteady Aerodynamics and Flow Control, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu210016, PR China
Tongwei Zhang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu210016, PR China Department of Aerodynamics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu210016, PR China
Liming Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Aerodynamics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu210016, PR China Key Laboratory of Unsteady Aerodynamics and Flow Control, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Yudao Street 29, Nanjing, Jiangsu210016, PR China Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore119260, Republic of Singapore
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

Fish schools and bird flocks, which involve a variety of orderly formations, have fascinated people for a long time. The collective performance of two flapping foils in parallel, which can self-propel in both lateral and longitudinal directions, is numerically studied through two-dimensional simulations in this paper. For the first time it is numerically confirmed that two flapping swimmers can simultaneously converge to equilibrium distances in both lateral and longitudinal directions. Two types of stable formations have been observed and which type occurs depends on the phase difference between two foils. The staggered formation appears in the in-phase scenario, and the side-by-side formation occurs in the anti-phase scenario. Moreover, both types of the stable formations strongly depend on the flapping frequency and amplitude, but are independent of the perturbation of the initial distance between the two foils when the perturbation is small. In addition, considerable velocity enhancement can be achieved by two foils in all of the stable formations, as compared with that of a single foil. Moreover, the velocity of the two-foil system can be couched as a specific scaling law, which is determined by the type of the stable formations. Finally, the mechanism behind the stable formations has been analysed. The results obtained here may shed some light on the understanding of collective behaviour of fish schools and bird flocks.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akoz, E. & Moored, K.W. 2018 Unsteady propulsion by an intermittent swimming gait. J. Fluid Mech. 834, 149172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashraf, I., Bradshaw, H., Ha, T.T., Halloy, J., Godoy-Diana, R. & Thiria, B. 2017 Simple phalanx pattern leads to energy saving in cohesive fish schooling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 95999604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashraf, I., Godoy-Diana, R., Halloy, J., Collignon, B. & Thiria, B. 2016 Synchronization and collective swimming patterns in fish (Hemigrammus bleheri). J. R. Soc. Interface 13, 20160734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballerini, M., et al. 2008 Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a field study. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 10, 12321237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boschitsch, B.M., Dewey, P.A. & Smits, A.J. 2014 Propulsive performance of unsteady tandem hydrofoils in an in-line configuration. Phys. Fluids 26, 051901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couzin, I.D. 2009 Collective cognition in animal groups. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 3643.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cui, Z. & Gao, X. 2012 Theory and applications of swarm intelligence. Neural Comput. 21, 205206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, L., He, G., Zhang, X. & Zhang, X. 2018 Stable formations of self-propelled fishlike swimmers induced by hydrodynamic interactions. J. R. Soc. Interface 15, 20180490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, P.A., Quinn, D.B., Boschitsch, B.M. & Smits, A.J. 2014 Propulsive performance of unsteady tandem hydrofoils in a side-by-side configuration. Phys. Fluids 26, 041903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, G.-J. & Lu, X.-Y. 2007 Characteristics of flow over traveling wavy foils in a side-by-side arrangement. Phys. Fluids 19, 057107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, F., Ho, K.L., Ristroph, L. & Shelley, M.J. 2017 A computational model of the flight dynamics and aerodynamics of a jellyfish-like flying machine. J. Fluid Mech. 819, 621655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filella, A., Nadal, F., Sire, C., Kanso, E. & Eloy, C. 2018 Model of collective fish behavior with hydrodynamic interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 198101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukuda, H., Torisawa, S., Sawada, Y. & Takagi, T. 2010 Ontogenetic changes in schooling behaviour during larval and early juvenile stages of pacific bluefin tuna Thunnus orientalis. J. Fish Biol. 76, 18411847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gazzola, M., Argentina, M. & Mahadevan, L. 2014 Scaling macroscopic aquatic locomotion. Nat. Phys. 10, 758761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert-Read, J.E. 2016 Understanding how animal groups achieve coordinated movement. J. Expl Biol. 219, 29712983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huera-Huarte, F.J. 2018 Propulsive performance of a pair of pitching foils in staggered configurations. J. Fluid Struct. 81, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntley, M.E. & Zhou, M. 2004 Influence of animals on turbulence in the sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 273, 6579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsey, T. & Dumas, G. 2008 Parametric study of an oscillating airfoil in a power-extraction regime. AIAA J. 46, 13181330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, J. 1976 Fish schooling. Nature 264, 701701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurt, M. & Moored, K.W. 2018 Flow interactions of two- and three-dimensional networked bio-inspired control elements in an in-line arrangement. Bioinspir. Biomim. 13, 045002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, M. 2012 Why do fish school? Curr. Zool. 58, 116128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, J.C., Beal, D.N., Lauder, G.V. & Triantafyllou, M.S. 2003 Fish exploiting vortices decrease muscle activity. Science 302, 15661569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, X., Guo, S., Wu, J. & Nan, J. 2018 Aerodynamic performance of a flapping foil with asymmetric heaving motion near a wall. J. Bionic Engng 15, 636646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, X., Wu, J. & Zhang, T. 2019 a Performance investigation of a self-propelled foil with combined oscillating motion in stationary fluid. Ocean Engng 175, 3349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, X., Wu, J. & Zhang, T. 2021 Self-directed propulsion of an unconstrained flapping swimmer at low Reynolds number: hydrodynamic behaviour and scaling laws. J. Fluid Mech. 907, R3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, X., Wu, J., Zhang, T. & Yang, L. 2019 b Phase difference effect on collective locomotion of two tandem autopropelled flapping foils. Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 054101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, X., Wu, J., Zhang, T. & Yang, L. 2020 Self-organization of multiple self-propelling flapping foils: energy saving and increased speed. J. Fluid Mech. 884, R1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lissaman, P.B.S. & Shollenberger, C.A. 1970 Formation flight of birds. Science 168, 10031005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lua, K.B., Lu, H., Zhang, X.H., Lim, T.T. & Yeo, K.S. 2016 Aerodynamics of two-dimensional flapping wings in tandem configuration. Phys. Fluids 28, 121901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muscutt, L.E., Weymouth, G.D. & Ganapathisubramani, B. 2017 Performance augmentation mechanism of in-line tandem flapping foils. J. Fluid Mech. 827, 484505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newbolt, J.W., Zhang, J. & Ristroph, L. 2019 Flow interactions between uncoordinated flapping swimmers give rise to group cohesion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 24192424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, S.G. & Sung, H.J. 2018 Hydrodynamics of flexible fins propelled in tandem, diagonal, triangular and diamond configurations. J. Fluid Mech. 840, 154189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partridge, B.L. & Pitcher, T.J. 1979 Evidence against a hydrodynamic function for fish schools. Nature 279, 418419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peng, Z.-R., Huang, H. & Lu, X.-Y. 2018 Collective locomotion of two closely spaced self-propelled flapping plates. J. Fluid Mech. 849, 10681095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portugal, S.J., Hubel, T.Y., Fritz, J., Heese, S., Trobe, D., Voelkl, B., Hailes, S., Wilson, A.M. & Usherwood, J.R. 2014 Upwash exploitation and downwash avoidance by flap phasing in ibis formation flight. Nature 505, 399402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramananarivo, S., Fang, F., Oza, A., Zhang, J. & Ristroph, L. 2016 Flow interactions lead to orderly formations of flapping wings in forward flight. Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 071201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raspa, V., Godoy-Diana, R. & Thiria, B. 2013 Topology-induced effect in biomimetic propulsive wakes. J. Fluid Mech. 729, 377387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usherwood, J.R., Stavrou, M., Lowe, J.C., Roskilly, K. & Wilson, A.M. 2011 Flying in a flock comes at a cost in pigeons. Nature 474, 494497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicsek, T. & Zafeiris, A. 2012 Collective motion. Phys. Rep. 517, 71140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z.J., Birch, J.M. & Dickinson, M.H. 2004 Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments. J. Expl Biol. 207, 449460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weimerskirch, H., Martin, J., Clerquin, Y., Alexandre, P. & Jiraskova, S. 2001 Energy saving in flight formation. Nature 413, 697698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittlesey, R.W., Liska, S. & Dabiri, J.O. 2010 Fish schooling as a basis for vertical axis wind turbine farm design. Bioinspir. Biomim. 5, 035005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, J. & Shu, C. 2009 Implicit velocity correction-based immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method and its applications. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 19631979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, L.M., Shu, C., Yang, W.M., Wang, Y. & Wu, J. 2017 An immersed boundary-simplified sphere function-based gas kinetic scheme for simulation of 3D incompressible flows. Phys. Fluids 29, 083605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, X., He, G. & Zhang, X. 2014 Flow-mediated interactions between two self-propelled flapping filaments in tandem configuration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 238105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lin et al. supplementary movie 1

Caption - Movie 1

Download Lin et al. supplementary movie 1(Video)
Video 3.7 MB

Lin et al. supplementary movie 2

Caption - Movie 2

Download Lin et al. supplementary movie 2(Video)
Video 5.9 MB