Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T14:12:00.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimating the value of von Kármán’s constant in turbulent pipe flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2014

S. C. C. Bailey ,
M. Vallikivi ,
M. Hultmark  and
A. J. Smits
S. C. C. Bailey*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
M. Vallikivi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
M. Hultmark
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
A. J. Smits
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Five separate data sets on the mean velocity distributions in the Princeton University/ONR Superpipe are used to establish the best estimate for the value of von Kármán’s constant for the flow in a fully developed, hydraulically smooth pipe. The profiles were taken using Pitot tubes, conventional hot wires and nanoscale thermal anemometry probes. The value of the constant was found to vary significantly due to measurement uncertainties in the mean velocity, friction velocity and the wall distance, and the number of data points included in the analysis. The best estimate for the von Kármán constant in turbulent pipe flow is found to be $0.40 \pm 0.02$. A more precise estimate will require improved instrumentation.

JFM classification

Turbulent Flows: Turbulent boundary layers Turbulent Flows: Turbulent Flows
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 749 , 25 June 2014 , pp. 79 - 98
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, S. C. C., Hultmark, M., Monty, J. P., Alfredsson, P. H., Chong, M. S., Duncan, R. D., Fransson, J. H. M., Hutchins, N., Marusic, I., McKeon, B. J., Nagib, H. M., Örlü, R., Segalini, A., Smits, A. J. & Vinuesa, R. 2013 Obtaining accurate mean velocity measurements in high Reynolds number turbulent boundary layers using Pitot tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 715, 642–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, S. C. C., Kunkel, G. J., Hultmark, M., Vallikivi, M., Hill, J. P., Meyer, K. A., Tsay, C., Arnold, C. B. & Smits, A. J. 2010 Turbulence measurements using a nanoscale thermal anemometry probe. J. Fluid Mech. 663, 160–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, P. & Huang, G. P. 1995 The law of the wall in turbulent flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 451, 165–188.Google Scholar
Buschmann, M. & Gad-el Hak, M. 2007 Recent developments in scaling of wall-bounded flows. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 42, 419–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, D. E. 1956 The law of the wake in the turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 191–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coles, D. E. & Hirst, E. A.1968 The young person’s guide to the data. In Proceedings of Computation of Turbulent Boundary Layers, Vol. II, AFOSR-IFP-Stanford Conference.Google Scholar
George, W. K. 2007 Is there a universal log law for turbulent wall-bounded flows? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 365, 789–806.Google Scholar
George, W. K. & Castillo, L. 1997 Zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer. Appl. Mech. Rev. 50, 689–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, G. D. & Bradshaw, P. 1972 A note on von Kármán’s constant in low Reynolds number turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 53, 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultmark, M., Bailey, S. C. C. & Smits, A. J. 2010 Scaling of near-wall turbulence in pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 649, 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultmark, M., Vallikivi, M., Bailey, S. C. C. & Smits, A. J. 2012 Turbulent pipe flow at extreme Reynolds numbers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (9), 094501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hultmark, M., Vallikivi, M., Bailey, S. C. C. & Smits, A. J. 2013 Logarithmic scaling of turbulence in smooth- and rough-wall pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 728, 376–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, N. & Choi, K.-S. 2002 Accurate measurements of local skin friction coefficient using hot-wire anemometry. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 38 (45), 421–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, J. & Moser, R. D. 2007 What are we learning from simulating wall turbulence? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 365, 715–732.Google ScholarPubMed
von Kármán, T.1930 Mechanische Ähnlichkeit und Turbulenz. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Applied Mechanics.Google Scholar
Klewicki, J. C., Fife, P. & Wei, T. 2009 On the logarithmic mean profile. J. Fluid Mech. 638, 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusic, I., McKeon, B. J., Monkewitz, P. A., Nagib, H. M., Smits, A. J. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 2010 Wall-bounded turbulent flows: recent advances and key issues. Phys. Fluids 22, 065103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusic, I., Monty, J. P., Hultmark, M. & Smits, A. J. 2013 On the logarithmic region in wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 716, R3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, B. J.2003 High Reynolds number turbulent pipe flow. PhD thesis, Princeton University.Google Scholar
McKeon, B. J., Li, J., Jiang, W., Morrison, J. F. & Smits, A. J. 2003 Pitot probe corrections in fully developed turbulent pipe flow. Meas. Sci. Technol. 14 (8), 1449–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, B. J., Li, J., Jiang, W., Morrison, J. F. & Smits, A. J. 2004a Further observations on the mean velocity distribution in fully developed pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 501, 135–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, B. J. & Smits, A. J. 2002 Static pressure correction in high Reynolds number fully developed turbulent pipe flow. Meas. Sci. Technol. 13, 1608–1614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, B. J., Swanson, C. J., Zagarola, M. V., Donnelly, R. J. & Smits, A. J. 2004b Friction factors for smooth pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 511, 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millikan, C. B.1938 A critical discussion of turbulent flows in channels and circular tubes. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Applied Mechanics, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Monty, J. P.2005 Developments in smooth wall turbulent duct flows. PhD thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. F., McKeon, B. J., Jiang, W. & Smits, A. J. 2004 Scaling of the streamwise velocity component in turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 508, 99–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagib, H. M. & Chauhan, K. A. 2008 Variations of von Kármán coefficient in canonical flows. Phys. Fluids 20, 101518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Örlü, R., Fransson, J. H. M. & Alfredsson, P. H. 2010 On near wall measurements of wall bounded flows – the necessity of an accurate determination of the wall position. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 46, 353–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Österlund, J. M., Johansson, A. V., Nagib, H. M. & Hites, M. H. 2000 A note on the overlap region in turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 12 (1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. E., Hafez, S. & Chong, M. S. 2001 A possible reinterpretation of the Princeton Superpipe data. J. Fluid Mech. 439, 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prandtl, L. 1925 Bericht über Untersuchungen zur ausgebildeten Turbulenz. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 5 (2), 136–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlichting, H. & Gersten, K. 2000 Boundary Layer Theory. 8th edn Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, M. P. & Flack, K. A. 2013 Reynolds-number scaling of turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 25, 025104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smits, A. J., McKeon, B. J. & Marusic, I. 2011 High Reynolds number wall turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, C. J., Julian, B., Ihas, G. G. & Donnelly, R. J. 2002 Pipe flow measurements over a wide range of Reynolds numbers using liquid helium and various gases. J. Fluid Mech. 461, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavoularis, S. 2005 Measurement in Fluid Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tropea, C., Yarin, A. & Foss, J.(Eds) 2007 Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallikivi, M. 2014 Wall-bounded turbulence at high Reynolds numbers. PhD thesis, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Vallikivi, M. & Smits, A. J. 2014 Fabrication and characterization of a novel nanoscale thermal anemometry probe. J. MEMS 99, doi:10.1109/JMEMS.2014.2299276.Google Scholar
Zagarola, M. V.1996 Mean-flow scaling of turbulent pipe flow. PhD thesis, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Zagarola, M. V. & Smits, A. J. 1998 Mean-flow scaling of turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 373, 33–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanoun, E.-S., Durst, F. & Nagib, H. 2003 Evaluating the law of the wall in two-dimensional fully developed turbulent channel flows. Phys. Fluids 15 (10), 3079–3089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar