Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:07:55.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamo action in rapidly rotating Rayleigh–Bénard convection at infinite Prandtl number

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2017

Fausto Cattaneo Open the ORCID record for Fausto Cattaneo [Opens in a new window]  and
David W. Hughes
Fausto Cattaneo*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
David W. Hughes
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In order better to understand the processes that lead to the generation of magnetic fields of finite amplitude, we study dynamo action driven by turbulent Boussinesq convection in a rapidly rotating system. In the limit of infinite Prandtl number (the ratio of viscous to thermal diffusion) the inertia term drops out of the momentum equation, which becomes linear in the velocity. This simplification allows a decomposition of the velocity into a thermal part driven by buoyancy, and a magnetic part driven by the Lorentz force. While the former velocity defines the kinematic dynamo problem responsible for the exponential growth of the magnetic field, the latter encodes the magnetic back reaction that leads to the eventual nonlinear saturation of the dynamo. We argue that two different types of solution should exist: weak solutions in which the saturated velocity remains close to the kinematic one, and strong solutions in which magnetic forces drive the system into a new strongly magnetised state that is radically different from the kinematic one. Indeed, we find both types of solutions numerically. Interestingly, we also find that, in our inertialess system, both types of solutions exist on the same subcritical branch of solutions bifurcating from the non-magnetic convective state, in contrast with the more traditional situation for systems with finite inertia in which weak and strong solutions are thought to exist on different branches. We find that for weak solutions, the force balance is the same as in the non-magnetic case, with the horizontal size of the convection varying as the one-third power of the Ekman number (the ratio of viscous to Coriolis forces), which gives rise to very small cells at small Ekman numbers (i.e. high rotation rates). In the strong solutions, magnetic forces become important and the convection develops on much larger horizontal scales. However, we note that even in the strong cases the solutions never properly satisfy Taylor’s constraint, and that viscous stresses continue to play a role. Finally, we discuss the relevance of our findings to the study of planetary dynamos in rapidly rotating systems such as the Earth.

JFM classification

MHD and Electrohydrodynamics: Dynamo theory Turbulent Flows: Rotating turbulence
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 825 , 25 August 2017 , pp. 385 - 411
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cattaneo, F., Emonet, T. & Weiss, N. 2003 On the interaction between convection and magnetic fields. Astrophys. J. 588, 1183–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattaneo, F. & Hughes, D. W. 2006 Dynamo action in a rotating convective layer. J. Fluid Mech. 553, 401–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. 1961 Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. Clarendon.Google Scholar
Childress, S. & Gilbert, A. D. 1995 Stretch, Twist, Fold: The Fast Dynamo. Springer.Google Scholar
Childress, S. & Soward, A. M. 1972 Convection-driven hydromagnetic dynamo. Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 837–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dormy, E. 2016 Strong-field spherical dynamos. J. Fluid Mech. 789, 500–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eltayeb, I. A. 1972 Hydromagnetic convection in a rapidly rotating fluid layer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 326, 229–254.Google Scholar
Eltayeb, I. A. & Roberts, P. H. 1970 Note: on the hydromagnetics of rotating fluids. Astrophys. J. 162, 699–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fautrelle, Y. & Childress, S. 1982 Convective dynamos with intermediate and strong fields. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 22, 235–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, D. W. & Cattaneo, F. 2016 Strong-field dynamo action in rapidly rotating convection with no inertia. Phys. Rev. E 93, 061101.Google ScholarPubMed
Jones, C. A. 2011 Planetary magnetic fields and fluid dynamos. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 583–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. A. & Roberts, P. H. 2000 Convection-driven dynamos in a rotating plane layer. J. Fluid Mech. 404, 311–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, E. M. & Buffett, B. A. 2013 Flow speeds and length scales in geodynamo models: the role of viscosity. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 371, 156–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1978 Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, E. N. 1979 Cosmical Magnetic Fields: Their Origin and Their Activity. Clarendon.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. H. 1978 Magneto-convection in a rapidly rotating fluid. In Rotating Fluids in Geophysics (ed. Roberts, P. H. & Soward, A. M.), Academic.Google Scholar
Roberts, P. H. & Glatzmaier, G. A. 2000 Geodynamo theory and simulations. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 1081–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, P. H. & Jones, C. A. 2000 The onset of magnetoconvection at large Prandtl number in a rotating layer I. Finite magnetic diffusion. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 92, 289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, P. H. & King, E. M. 2013 On the genesis of the Earth’s magnetism. Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 096801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, P. H. & Soward, A. M. 1992 Dynamo theory. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24, 459–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotvig, J. & Jones, C. A. 2002 Rotating convection-driven dynamos at low Ekman number. Phys. Rev. E 66, 056308.Google ScholarPubMed
Soderlund, K. M., King, E. M. & Aurnou, J. M. 2012 The influence of magnetic fields in planetary dynamo models. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 333, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stellmach, S. & Hansen, U. 2004 Cartesian convection driven dynamos at low Ekman number. Phys. Rev. E 70, 056312.Google ScholarPubMed
St-Pierre, M. 1994 The strong field branch of the Childress–Soward dynamo. In Stellar and Planetary Dynamos (ed. Proctor, M. R. E. & Gilbert, A. D.), pp. 295–302. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. B. 1963 The magneto-hydrodynamics of a rotating fluid and the Earth’s dynamo problem. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 274, 274–283.Google Scholar