Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-11T12:06:11.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic simulation of hydrodynamically interacting suspensions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

John F. Brady ,
Ronald J. Phillips ,
Julia C. Lester  and
Georges Bossis
John F. Brady
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Ronald J. Phillips
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Julia C. Lester
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Georges Bossis
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physique de la Matière Condensée, Université de Nice, Parc Valrose, 06034 Nice Cedex, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A general method for computing the hydrodynamic interactions among an infinite suspension of particles, under the condition of vanishingly small particle Reynolds number, is presented. The method follows the procedure developed by O'Brien (1979) for constructing absolutely convergent expressions for particle interactions. For use in dynamic simulation, the convergence of these expressions is accelerated by application of the Ewald summation technique. The resulting hydrodynamic mobility and/or resistance matrices correctly include all far-field non-convergent interactions. Near-field lubrication interactions are incorporated into the resistance matrix using the technique developed by Durlofsky, Brady & Bossis (1987). The method is rigorous, accurate and computationally efficient, and forms the basis of the Stokesian-dynamics simulation method. The method is completely general and allows such diverse suspension problems as self-diffusion, sedimentation, rheology and flow in porous media to be treated within the same formulation for any microstructural arrangement of particles. The accuracy of the Stokesian-dynamics method is illustrated by comparing with the known exact results for spatially periodic suspensions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 195 , October 1988 , pp. 257 - 280
Copyright
© 1988 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arp, P. A. & Mason S. G. 1977 The kinetics of flowing dispersions. VIII. Doublets of rigid spheres (theoretical). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 61, 21–43.Google Scholar
Batchelor G. K. 1970 The stress system in a suspension of force-free particles. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 545–570.Google Scholar
Batchelor G. K. 1972 Sedimentation in a dilute dispersion of spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 52, 245–268.Google Scholar
Batchelor G. K. 1974 Transport properties of two-phase materials with random structure. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 6, 227–255.Google Scholar
Batchelor G. K. 1977 The effect of Brownian motion on the bulk stress in a suspension of spherical particles. J. Fluid Mech. 83, 97–117.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. & Green J. T. 1972 The determination of the bulk stress in a suspension of spherical particles to order c2. J. Fluid Mech. 56, 401–427.Google Scholar
Beenakker C. W. J. 1986 Ewald sum of the Rotne-Prager tensor. J. Chem. Phys. 85, 1581–1582.Google Scholar
Bonnecaze R. 1987 A method for determining the effective conductivity of dispersions of particles. M.S. thesis, California Institute of Technology, 31 pp.
Bossis, G. & Brady J. F. 1984 Dynamic simulation of sheared suspensions. I. General method. J. Chem. Phys. 80, 5141–5154.Google Scholar
Bossis, G. & Brady J. F. 1987 Self-diffusion of Brownian particles in concentrated suspensions under shear. J. Chem. Phys. 87, 5437–5448.Google Scholar
Brady, J. F. & Bossis G. 1985 The rheology of concentrated suspensions of spheres in simple shear flow by numerical simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 155, 105–129.Google Scholar
Brady, J. F. & Bossis B. 1988 Stokesian dynamics. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 111–157.Google Scholar
Brady, J. F. & Durlofsky L. 1988 On the sedimentation rate of disordered suspensions. Phys. Fluids 31, 717–727.Google Scholar
Brinkman H. C. 1947 A calculation of the viscous force exerted by a flowing fluid on a dense swarm of particles. Appl. Sci. Res. A1, 27–34.Google Scholar
Dickinson E. 1985 Brownian dynamics with hydrodynamic interactions: The application to protein diffusional problems. Chem. Soc. Rev. 14, 421–455.Google Scholar
Durlofsky L. 1986 Topics in fluid mechanics: I. Flow between finite rotating disks. II. Simulation of hydrodynamically interacting particles in Stokes flow. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Durlofsky, L. & Brady J. F. 1987 Analysis of the Brinkman equation as a model for flow in porous media. Phys. Fluids 30, 3329–3341.Google Scholar
Durlofsky, L. & Brady J. F. 1988 Dynamic simulation of bounded suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. (to appear).Google Scholar
Durlofsky L., Brady, J. F. & Bossis G. 1987 Dynamic simulation of hydrodynamically interacting particles. J. Fluid Mech. 180, 21–49.Google Scholar
Ewald P. P. 1921 Die berechnung optischa und elektrostatischer Gitterpotentiale. Ann. Phys. 64, 253–287.Google Scholar
Glendinning, A. B. & Russel W. B. 1982 A pairwise additive description of sedimentation and diffusion in concentrated suspensions of hard spheres. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 89, 124–143.Google Scholar
Hasimoto H. 1959 On the periodic fundamental solution of the Stokes equations and their application to viscous flow past a cubic array of spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 5, 317–328.Google Scholar
Hinch E. J. 1977 An averaged-equation approach to particle interactions in a fluid suspension. J. Fluid Mech. 83, 695–720.Google Scholar
Howells I. D. 1974 Drag due to the motion of a Newtonian fluid through a sparse random array of small fixed rigid objects. J. Fluid Mech. 64, 449–475.Google Scholar
Jeffrey D. J. 1973 Conduction through a random suspension of spheres Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 335, 355–367.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, D. J. & Onishi Y. 1984 Calculation of the resistance and mobility functions for two unequal rigid spheres in low-Reynolds-number flow. J. Fluid Mech. 139, 261–290.Google Scholar
Kim, S. & Mifflin R. T. 1985 The resistance and mobility functions for two equal spheres in low-Reynolds-number flow. Phys. Fluids 28, 2033–2045.Google Scholar
Koch, D. L. & Brady J. F. 1987 On the symmetry properties of the effective diffusivity tensor in anisotropic porous media. Phys. Fluids 30, 642–650.Google Scholar
Ladyzhenskaya O. A. 1963 The Mathematical Theory of Viscous Incompressible Flow. Gordon & Breach.
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz E. M. 1959 Fluid Mechanics. Pergamon.
Mazur, P. & van Saarloos W. 1982 Many-sphere hydrodynamic interactions and mobilities in a suspension. Physica 115A, 21–57.Google Scholar
Nunan, K. C. & Keller J. B. 1984 Effective viscosity of a periodic suspension. J. Fluid Mech. 142, 269–287.Google Scholar
O'Brien R. W. 1979 A method for the calculation of the effective transport properties of suspensions of interacting particles. J. Fluid Mech. 91, 17–39.Google Scholar
Phillips R. J., Brady, J. F. & Bossis G. 1988a Hydrodynamic transport properties of hard-sphere dispersions. I. Suspensions of freely mobile particles. Phys. Fluids (to appear).Google Scholar
Phillips R. J., Brady, J. F. & Bossis G. 1988b Hydrodynamic transport properties of hard-sphere dispersions. II. Porous media. Phys. Fluids (to appear).Google Scholar
Rosensweig R. E. 1988 Ferrohydrodynamics, Cambridge University Press.
Rubinstein J. 1986 Effective equations for flow in random porous media with a large number of scales. J. Fluid Mech. 170, 379–383.Google Scholar
Saffman P. G. 1973 On the settling speed of free and fixed suspensions. Stud. Appl. Maths. 52, 115–127.Google Scholar
Smith E. R., Snook, I. K. & van Megen W. 1987 Hydrodynamic interactions in Brownian dynamics I. Periodic boundary conditions for computer simulations. Physica 143 A, 441–467.Google Scholar
Zick, A. & Homsy G. M. 1982 Stokes flow through periodic arrays of spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 115, 13–26.Google Scholar
Zuzovsky M., Adler, P. M. & Brenner H. 1983 Spatially periodic suspensions of convex particles in linear shear flows. III. Dilute arrays of spheres suspended in Newtonian fluids. Phys. Fluids 26, 1714–1723.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Brady et al. supplementary material

Supplementary Appendix

Download Brady et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 708 KB