Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:16:13.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computational analysis of the flow field structure of a non-reacting hypersonic flow over forward-facing steps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

P. H. M. Leite  and
W. F. N. Santos
P. H. M. Leite
Affiliation:
Combustion and Propulsion Laboratory (LCP), National Institute for Space Research (INPE), Cachoeira Paulista, SP 12630-000, Brazil
W. F. N. Santos*
Affiliation:
Combustion and Propulsion Laboratory (LCP), National Institute for Space Research (INPE), Cachoeira Paulista, SP 12630-000, Brazil
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This work is a computational study of a rarefied non-reacting hypersonic flow past a forward-facing step at zero-degree angle of attack in thermal non-equilibrium. Effects on the flow field structure and on the aerodynamic surface quantities due to changes in step frontal-face height are investigated by employing the direct simulation Monte Carlo method. The work focuses the attention of designers of hypersonic configurations on the fundamental parameter of surface discontinuity, which can have an important impact on even initial design. The results presented highlight the sensitivity of the primary flow field properties, velocity, density, pressure and temperature, to changes in the step frontal-face height. In addition, the behaviour of heat transfer, pressure and skin friction coefficients with variation of the step frontal-face height is detailed. The analysis shows that hypersonic flow past a forward-facing step in the transition flow regime is characterized by a strong compression ahead of the frontal face, which influences the aerodynamic surface properties upstream and adjacent to the frontal face. The analysis also shows that the extension of the upstream disturbance depends on the step frontal-face height. It was found that the recirculation region ahead of the step is also a function of the frontal-face height. A sequence of Moffatt eddies of decreasing size and intensity is observed in the concave step corner. Locally high heating and pressure loads were observed at three locations along the surface, i.e. on the lower surface, on the frontal face and on the upper surface. The results showed that both loads rely on the frontal-face height. The peak values for the heat transfer coefficient on the frontal-face surface were at least one order of magnitude larger than the maximum value observed for a smooth surface, i.e. a flat plate without a step. A comparison of the present simulation results with numerical and experimental data showed close agreement concerning the wall pressure acting on the step surface.

JFM classification

Boundary Layers: Boundary layer separation Aerodynamics: High-speed flow Rarefied Gas Flow: Molecular dynamics
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 763 , 25 January 2015 , pp. 460 - 499
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, F. J., Garcia, A. L. & Alder, B. J. 1998 Cell size dependence of transport coefficient in stochastic particle algorithms. Phys. Fluids 10, 1540–1542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, F. J., Garcia, A. L. & Alder, B. J. 2000 Erratum: Cell size dependence of transport coefficient in stochastic particle algorithms. Phys. Fluids 12, 731.Google Scholar
Becker, M., Robben, F. & Cattolica, R. 1974 Velocity distribution function near the leading edge of a flat plate. AIAA J. 12, 1247–1253.Google Scholar
Bertin, J. J. & Goodrich, W. D.1980 Aerodynamic heating for gaps in laminar and transitional boundary layers. In 18th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Pasadena, CA, USA, January 14–16, AIAA Paper 80-0287.Google Scholar
Bertram, M. H., Weinstein, L. M., Cary, A. M. Jr & Arrington, J. P. 1967 Heat transfer to wavy wall in hypersonic flow. AIAA J. 5, 1760–1767.Google Scholar
Bertram, M. H. & Wiggs, M. M. 1963 Effect of surface distortions on the heat transfer to a wing at hypersonic speeds. AIAA J. 1, 1313–1319.Google Scholar
Bird, G. A. 1981 Monte Carlo simulation in an engineering context. In Rarefied Gas Dynamics (ed. Fisher, S. S.), Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol. 74, part I, pp. 239–255. AIAA.Google Scholar
Bird, G. A. 1989 Perception of numerical method in rarefied gasdynamics. In Rarefied Gas Dynamics: Theoretical and Computational Techniques (ed. Muntz, E. P., Weaver, D. P. & Campbell, D. H.), Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol. 118, pp. 374–395. AIAA.Google Scholar
Bird, G. A. 1994 Molecular Gas Dynamics and the Direct Simulation of Gas Flows. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bird, G. A. 2009 A Comparison of collision energy-based and temperature-based procedures in DSMC. In Rarefied Gas Dynamics: 26th International Symposium (ed. Abe, T.), pp. 245–250. American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
Bogdonoff, S. M. & Kepler, C. E. 1955 Separation of a supersonic turbulent boundary layer. J. Aeronaut. Sci. 22, 414–430.Google Scholar
Borgnakke, C. & Larsen, P. S. 1975 Statistical collision model for Monte Carlo simulation of polyatomic gas mixture. J. Comput. Phys. 18, 405–420.Google Scholar
Boyd, I. D. 1998 Analysis of rotational nonequilibrium in standing shock waves of nitrogen. AIAA J. 28, 1997–1999.Google Scholar
Camussi, R., Felli, M., Pereira, F., Aloisio, G. & DiMarco, A. 2008 Statistical properties of wall pressure fluctuations over a forward-facing step. Phys. Fluids 20, 075113.Google Scholar
Cercignani, C. & Frezzotti, A. 1989 Numerical simulation of supersonic rarefied gas flows past a flat plate: effects of the gas–surface interaction model on the flowfield. In Rarefied gas Dynamics: Theoretical and Computational Techniques (ed. Muntz, E. P., Weaver, D. P. & Campbell, D. H.), Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol. 118, pp. 552–566. AIAA.Google Scholar
Chapman, D. R., Kuehn, D. M. & Larson, H. K.1958 Investigation of separated flows in supersonic and subsonic streams with emphasis on the effect of transition. NACA Tech. Rep. 1356.Google Scholar
Charwat, A. F. 1971 Separation of a supersonic accelerated flow over notches. AIAA J. 9, 1656–1657.Google Scholar
Charwat, A. F., Dewey, C. F. Jr, Roos, J. N. & Hitz, J. A. 1961a An investigation of separated flows – part II: flow in the cavity and heat transfer. J. Aerosp. Sci. 28, 513–527.Google Scholar
Charwat, A. F., Roos, J. N., Dewey, C. F. Jr & Hitz, J. A. 1961b An investigation of separated flows – part I: the pressure field. J. Aerosp. Sci. 28, 457–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deepak, N. R., Gai, S. L. & Neely, A. J.2010 A computational study of high enthalpy flow over a rearward facing step. In 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, Orlando, FL, AIAA Paper 2010-0444.Google Scholar
Driftmyer, R. T. 1973 A Forward Facing Step Study: The Step Height Less than the Boundary-Layer Thickness, NOLTR, vol. 73–98. Naval Ordinance Laboratory.Google Scholar
Estruch, D., MacManus, D. G., Stollery, J. L., Lawson, N. J. & Garry, K. P. 2010 Hypersonic interference heating in the vicinity of surface protuberances. Exp. Fluids 49, 683–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everhart, J. L. 2009 Supersonic/hypersonic laminar heating correlations for rectangular and impact-induced open and closed cavities. J. Spacecr. Rockets 46, 545–560.Google Scholar
Everhart, J. L., Alter, S. J., Merski, N. R., Wood, W. A. & Prabhu, R. K.2006 Pressure gradient effects on hypersonic cavity flow heating. In 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2006-0185.Google Scholar
Garcia, A. L. & Wagner, W. 2000 Time step truncation error in direct simulation Monte Carlo. Phys. Fluids 12, 2621–2633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldshtik, M. A. 1990 Viscous-flow paradoxes. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 22, 441–472.Google Scholar
Grotowsky, M. G. & Ballmann, J. 2000 Numerical investigation of hypersonic step-flows. Shock Waves 10, 57–72.Google Scholar
Guo, K. & Liaw, G. S.2001 A review: boundary conditions for the DSMC method. In Proceedings of the 35th AIAA Thermophysics Conference, June 11–14, Anaheim, CA, AIAA Paper 2001-2953.Google Scholar
Gupta, R. N., Scott, C. D. & Moss, J. N. 1985 Surface-slip equations for low Reynolds number multicomponent air flow. In Rarefied Gas Dynamics: Thermal Design of Aeroassisted Orbital Transfer Vehicles (ed. Nelson, H. F.), Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol. 96, pp. 465–490. AIAA.Google Scholar
Hadjiconstantinou, N. G. 2000 Analysis of discretization in the direct simulation Monte Carlo. Phys. Fluids 12, 2634–2638.Google Scholar
Hahn, M. 1969 Experimental investigation of separated flow over a cavity at hypersonic speed. AIAA J. 7, 1092–1098.Google Scholar
Harvey, J. K. 1986 Direct simulation Monte Carlo method and comparison with experiment. In Rarefied Gas Dynamics: Thermophysical Aspect of Re-Entry Flows (ed. Moss, J. N. & Scott, C. D.), Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol. 103, pp. 25–43. AIAA.Google Scholar
Harvey, J. K. & Gallis, M. A. 2000 Review of code validation studies in high-speed low-density flows. J. Spacecr. Rockets 37, 8–20.Google Scholar
Harvey, J. K. & Gallis, M. A.2003 A review of a validation exercise on the use of the DSMC method to compute viscous/inviscid interactions in hypersonic flow. AIAA Paper 2003-3643.Google Scholar
Hermina, W. L. 1989 Monte Carlo simulation of rarefied flow along a flat plate. J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer 3, 7–12.Google Scholar
Higdon, J. J. L. 1985 Stokes flow in arbitrary two-dimensional domains: shear flow over ridges and cavities. J. Fluid Mech. 159, 195–226.Google Scholar
Hinderks, M. & Radespiel, R.2006 Investigation of hypersonic gap flow of a reentry nosecap with consideration of fluid structure interaction. In 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, USA, January 9–12, 2006, AIAA Paper 2006-0188.Google Scholar
Hinderks, M., Radespiel, R. & Gülhan, A.2004 Simulation of hypersonic gap flow with consideration of fluid structure interaction. In 34th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, Portland, OR, AIAA Paper 2004-2238.Google Scholar
Holden, M. S. & Wadhams, T. P.2003 A review of experimental studies for DSMC and Navier–Stokes code validation in laminar regions of shock/shock and shock/boundary layer interaction including real gas effects in hypersonic flows. AIAA Paper 2003-3641.Google Scholar
Howell, R. H. & Korst, H. H. 1971 Separation controlled transonic drag-rise modification for V-shaped notches. AIAA J. 9, 2051–2057.Google Scholar
Hurlbut, F. C. 1989 Sensitivity of hypersonic flow to wall/gas interaction models using DSMC. J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer 3, 374–379.Google Scholar
Jackson, A. P., Hillier, R. & Soltani, S. 2001 Experimental and computational study of laminar cavity flows at hypersonic speeds. J. Fluid Mech. 427, 329–358.Google Scholar
Ji, M. & Wang, M. 2010 Sound generation by turbulent boundary-layer flow over small steps. J. Fluid Mech. 654, 161–193.Google Scholar
Ji, M. & Wang, M. 2012 Surface pressure fluctuations on steps immersed in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 712, 471–504.Google Scholar
Kim, H. D. & Setoguchi, T.2007 Shock-induced boundary layer separation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Experimental and Computational Aerothermodynamics of Internal Flows, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
Leite, P. H. M.2009 Direct simulation of the step influence on a reentry vehicle surface (in Portuguese). MS thesis, INPE (National Institute for Space Research), Brazil.Google Scholar
Lord, R. 1994 Direct simulation of rarefied hypersonic flow over a flat plate with incomplete surface accommodation. In Rarefied Gas Dynamics: Space Science and Engineering (ed. Shizgal, B. D. & Weaver, D. P.), Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol. 160, pp. 221–228. AIAA.Google Scholar
Mazaheri, A. & Wood, W. A. 1967 Heating augmentation for short hypersonic protuberances. J. Spacecr. Rockets 46, 284–291.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1964 Viscous and resistive eddies near a sharp corner. J. Fluid Mech. 18, 1–18.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, A. Jr & Chokani, N. 1994 Hypersonic flow past open cavities. AIAA J. 32, 2387–2393.Google Scholar
Nestler, D. E., Saydah, A. R. & Auxer, W. L. 1969 Heat transfer to steps and cavities in hypersonic turbulent flow. AIAA J. 7, 1368–1370.Google Scholar
Neumann, R. D. & Freeman, D. C. 2012 Experimental measurement of aerodynamic heating about complex shapes at supersonic Mach numbers. J. Spacecr. Rockets 49, 1080–1087.Google Scholar
Pan, F. & Acrivos, A. 1967 Steady flows in rectangular cavities. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 643–655.Google Scholar
Petley, D. H., Smith, D. M., Edwards, C. L. W., Carlson, A. B. & Hamilton, H. H. II 1984 Surface step induced gap heating in the shuttle thermal protection system. J. Spacecr. Rockets 11, 156–161.Google Scholar
Pitts, W. C. & Murbach, M. S.1982 Flight measurements of tile gap heating on the space shuttle. In AIAA/ASME 3rd Joint Thermophysics, Fluids, Plasma and Heat Transfer Conference, St. Louis, MO, AIAA Paper 82-0840.Google Scholar
Pullin, D. I. & Harvey, J. K. 1977 Direct simulation calculations of the rarefied flow past a forward-facing step. AIAA J. 15, 124–126.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. W. E. & Berry, C. J. 1965 Research at the NPL on the influence at supersonic speeds and low Reynolds numbers of thick laminar boundary layers. In Advances in Applied Mechanics: Rarefied Gas Dynamics (ed. Leeuw, J. H.), vol. I, Suppl. 3, pp. 574–591. Academic.Google Scholar
Schäfer, F., Breuer, M. & Durst, F. 2009 The dynamics of the transitional flow over a backward-facing step. J. Fluid Mech. 623, 85–119.Google Scholar
Schaff, S. A. & Chambre, P. L. 1958 Fundamentals of Gas Dynamics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stüer, H., Gyr, A. & Kinzelbach, W. 1999 Laminar separation on a forward facing step. Eur. J. Mech. (B/Fluids) 18, 675–692.Google Scholar
Uebelhack, H. T.1969 Turbulent flow separation ahead of forward facing steps in supersonic two-dimensional and axisymmetric flows. Report VKI-TN-54. Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics.Google Scholar
Vharbonnier, J. & Boerrigter, H.1993 Contribution to the study of gap induced boundary layer transition in hypersonic flow. In AIAA/DGLR 5th International Aerospace Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference, Munich, Germany, AIAA Paper 93-5111.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, P. R. & East, R. A. 1968 Mean properties of a region of separation in laminar hypersonic flow. AIAA J. 6, 2183–2184.Google Scholar
Zukoski, E. E. 1967 Turbulent boundary-layer separation in front of a forward-facing step. AIAA J. 5, 1746–1753.Google Scholar